RE: Large File Transfer

Hi Lou, My two cents on this. The activemq team possibly chose http/ftp over raw tcp sockets to get around 1. firewall/proxy setups that may be possible between an ActiveMQ broker and the file server. Using pre-defined ports can allow you to control the traffic. 2. A higher level protocol like

Re: ActiveMQ 5.3 scope & target date? (and over all project roadmap resources)

I too am interested in this, anyone have information on this? jareddunne wrote: > > Is there some sort of target release date for a ActiveMQ 5.3 Release? > What is the scope of the 5.3 release compared to 5.2? Bug fixes? Any > new features/improvements? I'd also be curious to hear about any > m

Re: How to preserve order of messages in Network of Brokers?

Thanks Bruce. bsnyder wrote: > > On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 1:30 AM, riteshtijoriwala > wrote: >> >> I have two consumers C1 and C2 and two brokers B1 and B2 that see each >> other. >> I have one producer P1. >> >> P1 is connected initially to B1 and C2 is connected to B1. C1 is >> connected >> to

Re: Options for preferring stability over reliability

MassDosage wrote: > > What is this wrapper you are talking about? > > I've never seen that "couldn't ping JVM" message so I'm not sure whether > this is the same issue or not. > > > ActiveMQ gets "shipped" with Java wrappers http://wrapper.tanukisoftware.org its a way of daemonising java

JDBC master/slave runtime issue

We're running activeMQ in a master/slave configuration with a JDBC data store and two brokers in a failover configuration. According to the logs, everything is happy. The behavior we're seeing is that, in testing, when we kill the master the slave takes over (as designed, and the log file shows

Re: STOMP redelivery policy

Hi Dave, I don't have any information about ActiveMQ itself but in my own python STOMP client, when an exception is thrown while processing a message, I have the client enqueue a copy of the message on an error queue and ACK the original message to the broker. The gotcha you to watch out for when

Re: STOMP redelivery policy

I did not see a response to this, but I am interested in this functionality as well... if not supported directly by activemq, is it possible to use camel to do this? What are others doing that want to implement the dead letter channel pattern doing? Our consumer is python, so we are limited to

Thread leak ActiveMQ 5.2 w/ stomp

We have ActiveMQ 5.2.0 running inside of JBoss 5.0.1. There are about 100 stomp clients sending messages to a single queue that has a pool of 10 MDB consumers. The load is about 10 messages per minute. When the messages are processed another message is usually posted to a topic. We are seeing

Redelivery of messages in transactional mode

Hi All, I tried hard to get the redelivery working when route is transacted. But so far no luck with redelivery at all. I am using camel-1.5.0 in servicemix 3.2.2. This is how my camel-context.xml looks like: http://activemq.apache.org/camel/schema/spring";>

Re: What port uses webconsole?

see the -Dwebconsole.jms.url property in the doco: http://activemq.apache.org/web-console.html 2009/5/5 liquidd > > I have configuration with > ... > > > > ... > > and webconsole (http://localhost:8161/admin) is not working. After I > changed > port to 61616 it's work! Why? > > Thank You! >

What port uses webconsole?

I have configuration with ... ... and webconsole (http://localhost:8161/admin) is not working. After I changed port to 61616 it's work! Why? Thank You! -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/What-port-uses-webconsole--tp23387668p23387668.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - Use

SystemUsage memory limit reached

I'm experiencing an issue running ActiveMQ 5.2.0 where it unpredictably stops processing messages after running for a few days (up to a week or two). A stack trace shows up in activemq.log like so: ERROR Service- Async error occurred: javax.jms.ResourceAllocationException:

Re: connection failover using ActiveMQ 5.2

If you read the "instruction" page you will see the last sentence says: "Timeouts on the failover transport are available since 5.3 version." That caught me out too. Seems we're going to have to wait for 5.3 for that one. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/connection-fail

Re: No way to use activeMQ via http. TCP works fine, but not http. Please help.

Hi, there's currently an effort to improve http transport for 5.3 release https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2238 Please post all your comments there and I'll try to resolve them. Cheers -- Dejan Bosanac Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/ ActiveMQ in Action - http://ww

Re: Options for preferring stability over reliability

What is this wrapper you are talking about? I've never seen that "couldn't ping JVM" message so I'm not sure whether this is the same issue or not. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Options-for-preferring-stability-over-reliability-tp22852174p23384104.html Sent from the A