bsnyder wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 2:33 PM, phpslacker wrote:
>>
>> Hey guys,
>>
>> I'm having trouble starting activemq with mysql persistence adapter.
>> Activemq won't start up instead it bombs out a gazillion exceptions
>>
>> Below is my activemq conf file and the output of trying to
Hi Todd,
will be a while before we get round to doing a .NET client for blaze -
we want to stabilize the Java client first
cheers,
Rob
On 7 Jul 2009, at 05:04, tnine wrote:
Hi all,
I've recently had to pick up an existing .NET project. It's in C#
3.5.
It's far too large to convert t
Hi all,
I've recently had to pick up an existing .NET project. It's in C# 3.5.
It's far too large to convert to Java, and we need something like
ActiveBlaze as we have high throughput requirements. I'd like to deploy
ActiveBlaze to begin with, is this possible with the .NET clients or not?
T
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 2:33 PM, phpslacker wrote:
>
> Hey guys,
>
> I'm having trouble starting activemq with mysql persistence adapter.
> Activemq won't start up instead it bombs out a gazillion exceptions
>
> Below is my activemq conf file and the output of trying to start activemq
> with this co
Hey guys,
I'm having trouble starting activemq with mysql persistence adapter.
Activemq won't start up instead it bombs out a gazillion exceptions
Below is my activemq conf file and the output of trying to start activemq
with this conf
http://www.nabble.com/file/p24362359/exceptions.log excepti
A bug that just got fixed :)
Thanks for spotting this
Cheers
--
Dejan Bosanac
Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/
ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/
Blog - http://www.nighttale.net
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 2:34 PM, chadshowalter wrote:
>
> I've noticed that excepti
I've noticed that exceptions thrown from
org.apache.activemq.util.IdGenerator.java are logged using a
java.util.logging.Logger, instead of a commons logging logger. As a result,
the log4j config used for activemq is ignored for log output from this
class.
Am I missing something? Is this a bug
Hi,
I guess the most reliable solution would be to try send/receive a message to
the broker.
Cheers
--
Dejan Bosanac
Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/
ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/
Blog - http://www.nighttale.net
On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 8:55 PM, /U wrote: