Re: Artemis JConsole Support

Sorry for the delay here is the artemis-service.xml artemis-broker-0.0.0.0 ActiveMQ Artemis: broker @ 0.0.0.0 Apache ActiveMQ Artemis is a reliable messaging broker C:\Apache\apache-artemis-2.0.0\bin\broker\log roll %JAVA_HOME%\bin\java.exe

Re: Setting client prefetch in Artemis Core API

I think the simplest way is to set it on the URL, e.g.: ServerLocator locator = ActiveMQClient.createServerLocator("vm://0?consumerWindowSize=1024); ClientSessionFactory factory = locator.createSessionFactory(); ClientSession session = factory.createSession(); session.start();

Setting client prefetch in Artemis Core API

Hi, How do I set the client prefetch when using the Artemis Core API? I've seen examples of setting it in the URL when using the JMS API but couldn't find anything that worked for the Core API. I am creating my client consumer as so: ServerLocator locator =

Re: Occasionally EOF on connection

Tim how can I provide with more detailed logs? I can try and adjust broker side to have more debugs but client is unlikely to extend its messages Thx Marcin Od: "Timothy Bish" Do: "users" Wysłane: środa, 26 kwiecień 2017 22:16:34 Temat:

Re: Occasionally EOF on connection

On 04/26/2017 04:00 PM, Tim Bain wrote: Your right, a connection to localhost should be rock-solid. Sorry I missed that. Is there any possibility that a firewall (either OS or application) might be interfering with your connections? I feel like I'm grasping at straws a little bit, but I can't

Re: Occasionally EOF on connection

Your right, a connection to localhost should be rock-solid. Sorry I missed that. Is there any possibility that a firewall (either OS or application) might be interfering with your connections? I feel like I'm grasping at straws a little bit, but I can't explain EOFs on both sides of the

Re: Can ActiveMQ take advantage of Oracle transparent application failover?

Pluggable storage lockers ( http://activemq.apache.org/pluggable-storage-lockers.html) could let you work around any issues with the locking behavior under this configuration. The code for the current Oracle interface is at

Re: Can ActiveMQ take advantage of Oracle transparent application failover?

I have not used oracle rac but it sounds like active mq is tied to a single instance rather than any available oracle server. Have you considered putting a load balancer in front that can determine whether the back end is up and can route requests appropriately? Not sure if this would work as

Re: ActiveMQ JDBC with journaling enabled

I interpret that document to be written in the context of a requirement that the broker not lose persistent messages in the event of a restart or failover, since those are the requirements of most ActiveMQ users using a persistence store. (Typically, either you need 100% persistence and you use a

Last chance: ApacheCon is just three weeks away

ApacheCon is just three weeks away, in Miami, Florida, May 15th - 18th. http://apachecon.com/ There's still time to register and attend. ApacheCon is the best place to find out about tomorrow's software, today. ApacheCon is the official convention of The Apache Software Foundation, and includes

Re: ActiveMQ JDBC with journaling enabled

My answer was based on ActiveMQ Artemis. Sorry for the confusion. On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 1:56 PM, khandelwalanuj < anuj.cool.khandel...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yes I was talking about ActiveMQ 5.x > > Can you also clarify about the first point where it says that journaled > JDBC > store is

Re: Can ActiveMQ take advantage of Oracle transparent application failover?

Tim, Thanks for the detailed reply. I will share with our app design/development team for more in-depth discussion and post back with status on any workarounds or coding we come up with. Also, may consider entering a feature request as you suggested. Agree it may be a bigger update than team

Re: ActiveMQ JDBC with journaling enabled

Yes I was talking about ActiveMQ 5.x Can you also clarify about the first point where it says that journaled JDBC store is incompatible with the JDBC master/slave. What does it exactly mean ? Link which says this:

Re: Network of brokers and forwarding performance

Auke, Pooling your connections is definitely a good thing, but since you say that the system still exhibits the performance slowdown, your next step is what I said in my first response: to characterize which OS resource (CPU, network, disk, memory) is the limiting one, and on which broker or

Re: ActiveMQ JDBC with journaling enabled

Anuj and Martyn, were your question and your answer about ActiveMQ 5.x or Artemis? I think the question was about 5.x and Martyn's answer was about Artemis. If so, see a 5.x response below. I don't believe that there is any reason other than the potential for message loss that you described

Re: ActiveMQ JDBC with journaling enabled

Hi On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 6:51 AM, khandelwalanuj < anuj.cool.khandel...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I was evaluating ActiveMQ's JDBC based persistent store with journaling > enabled. Have couple of doubts: > > 1. I was reading > https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Fuse_ >

ActiveMQ JDBC with journaling enabled

Hi, I was evaluating ActiveMQ's JDBC based persistent store with journaling enabled. Have couple of doubts: 1. I was reading https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Fuse_Message_Broker/5.4/html/Clustering_Guide/files/Failover-MasterSlave-JDBC.html which says that the journaled JDBC store