Hi, Tim
Happy to communicate with u again.
I pasted the exception message on my first message.
It didn't show any detailed or explicit hint.
There's not any valuable info about how to deal with the problem.
No any message is about Brokers.
I only set the value "nested.wireFormat.maxInactivityDur
On May 2, 2017 8:23 PM, "Chester_Zheng" wrote:
Hi, Tim
First of all, Thanks for your response.
I know the exception message is on the factory
No, the exception message is about the *connection*, not the factory.
, and the close() method is a public-method that anywhere can invoke it if
it ha
Hi, Tim
First of all, Thanks for your response.
I know the exception message is on the factory, and the close() method is a
public-method that anywhere can invoke it if it has the factory instance.
I've seen the source code and found the exception message.
But, I can't understand why ActiveMQ a
That's more a question to the application server guys.. I would ask
that question to wildfly. I believe there's a thing you can do that..
some guys from Wildfly I know are part of this list but i doubt they
follow this on a daily basis, so you would be better asking this
question to wildfly guys at
I am using an ActiveMQ resource adapter to connect to a remote ActiveMQ queue
on a wildfly server. I have the following code in my jboss-ejb.xml to set up
my resource adapter
MyNotificationMDB
mq-ra
This maps to the following MDB
@MessageDriven(
activationConfig = {
@ActivationConf
On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 10:57 AM, Mike Tod wrote:
> One failover cluster in the AWS US instance another failover cluster in the
> AWS Europe instance (more specifically the German instance) then connect both
> and filter by region to keep local traffic within the region.
How would you do the fi
a kind of last value queue that would keep the last N messages would
make a lot of sense.
I'm not sure it's a topic.. although with the new addressing model it
would allow either topic or queue to be like that. you would need a
type of queue for that.
it's a totally new feature.. we would need to
Hi,
Someone please reply with answer for below query
What are different failover scenarios in activeMQ?
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/What-are-different-failover-scenarios-in-activeMQ-tp4725448.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive a
Hi,
I want to know when broker fails in ActiveMQ.
What will happen if a broker fails?
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/What-will-happen-if-a-broker-fails-tp4725447.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi,
I am having query regarding broker in ActiveMQ,
How can we improve performance of broker if number of messages are too
large?
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/How-can-we-improve-performance-of-broker-if-number-of-messages-are-too-large-tp4725446.ht
thanks a lot Dan... I don't think the issue was replication... it was
about how the address was created... , but I can see Justin fixed it..
nice one!
I recommend you specifying the routing type when creating the addresss
on 2.0 though.
I woud use 2.1 anyways.. I'm finishing up and I will start
Selectors are a way for a consumer to tell the broker, "Don't send me
messages like this when you do normal dispatch for this destination."
For a queue, all messages are essentially communal between the set of
consumers, so the skipped messages stay on the queue for some other
consumer (one with a
ActiveMQ shouldn't mind, if your OS allows that.
Tim
On May 2, 2017 1:27 AM, "pbCode" wrote:
> Thanks Christopher for your reply. That really helps. To ensure the CPU
> stays at a controllable way can I throttle the CPU to say 50% to ensure
> everything just ticks over whilst the operation com
Hi Tim
OK - just one more question:
If having a single consumer per queue wasn't a problem, would Selectors
still be a workable solution?
Or can they only be used if you have consumers (i.e. is it the consumers who
have to specify them)?
OK OK - another:
If it was OK to lose messages when con
HI Tim
That's awesome, very helpful advice.
Thanks!
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/destination-unspecified-can-ActiveMQ-set-it-tp4725338p4725419.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Thanks Christopher for your reply. That really helps. To ensure the CPU
stays at a controllable way can I throttle the CPU to say 50% to ensure
everything just ticks over whilst the operation completes?
Thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/purge-perfor
16 matches
Mail list logo