Apologies, mail server issue meant I wasn't sure that the original message had
gotten through. Obviously it had!
These are the same issue so only looking for advice on one of them, thanks.
___
From: Justin Bertram [jbert...@apache.org]
Sent: 16 October 2019 17:09
To: users@activemq.apache.o
Your understanding is correct. Thank you for your review.
--
Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-User-f2341805.html
Hi
Artemis has already a similar feature to network of brokers. Its named
federation.
It is nearly now at feature parity, one last ticket feature left is retro
active consumers but that should be in next release of Artemis, its currently
in PR.
Artemis also has many features not exis
Hi,
Even if it's stated like this on website, I consider ActiveMQ "Classic"
(I don't this name ;)) and Artemis as two different subprojects on the
ActiveMQ umbrella.
It happens a lot at Apache to have several subprojects under the same
"umbrella": Felix, Karaf, ...
Both subprojects are active an
Richard, didn't you just send this same email to the ActiveMQ user list
(although with a slightly different subject)? Just want to clarify if they
are the same or different issues.
Justin
On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 10:40 AM Cannock, Richard <
richard.cann...@edfenergy.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> We
ActiveMQ Artemis already has a significant amount of feature parity with
ActiveMQ 5.x (i.e. "classic"), but the fundamental architecture of both
brokers is quite different so even when Artemis becomes 6 a migration
process will be necessary. Artemis doesn't support the exact same "network
of broker
Hi
I am working on a scenario where there is a single broker (configured as
master/slave) and two types of clients, a web application (producer) which
send requests and waits for responses and about 5000 java client
applications (consumer) which receive requests and send back responses.
Every java
We are building a new product with Event Driven Programming. For That we need
JMS Provider. We compared ActiveMQ Classic and Artemis.
ActiveMQ Official site says
"Once Artemis reaches a sufficient level of feature parity with the 5.x
code-base it will become ActiveMQ 6".
What should be used Artemi
Hi,
We are trying to enlist in a network of brokers arrangement with a third party
broker hosted externally to us. We wish to receive messages from a topic
(called sourceTopic) and forward to internal queues on our local broker for
load balancing and throughput purposes using virtual destinatio
Hi,
We are trying to enlist in a network of brokers arrangement with a third party
broker hosted externally to us. We wish to receive messages from a topic
(called sourceTopic) and forward to internal queues on our local broker for
load balancing and throughput purposes using virtual destinatio
10 matches
Mail list logo
