It's always nice to hear stories like this...
valeu e Obrigado! :) (sorry for the PT-br... just saying thanks a lot
with a personal touch)
On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 7:38 PM Edson Richter wrote:
>
> We actually run Artemis in production with more than 1.000.000 messages
> processed per week (evenl
We actually run Artemis in production with more than 1.000.000 messages
processed per week (evenly distributted during the 24 hours of the day), in a
VM with 64GB RAM, 16 vCore and 256GB SSD NVME in running in raid mode.
Performance is a quite dificult subject to talk about, because all depends o
publishing a benchmark is a game without end.
It's always possible to get a particular usecase or tweak things in a
way that will move the benchmark in any direction you want.
the best you can do is to measure the use case you want to achieve
yourself. I have spent a lot of time with benchmark
Hi,
/"the reporting performance of Artemis is significantly higher than
Classic"/
I'm very interested about such of reporting performance between Artemis
and AMQ.
Is it possible to share?
Regards,
François
On 26/09/2022 16:40, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
Couple minor corrections for anyone e
