Re: ActiveMQ swallows messages in our environment, I need some suggestions

ctors in place of duplex. > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3694 > > > > > > On 12 March 2012 21:57, Kai Hackemesser > wrote: > >> Hello, > >> > >> - Given a network of V5.5.1 brokers named "brokerA" and "broke

ActiveMQ swallows messages in our environment, I need some suggestions

Hello, - Given a network of V5.5.1 brokers named "brokerA" and "brokerB", and - application "serviceA" is connected to "brokerA" and subscribed to a "request" topic and ready to produce on a "response" topic, and - client application "clientB" is connected to "brokerB", and - named client is first

Re: strange topic subscriptions not disappearing [V5.5.1]

I'm not a big fan of Spring's JmsTemplate in general. > ActiveMQ provides an impl of the JMS API, and I think that provides a > simple enough abstraction. It seems to me that adding the Spring layer on > top just adds a layer of complexity. My $0.02. > > Hope this helps, >

Re: strange topic subscriptions not disappearing [V5.5.1]

scriptions. Cheers, Kai 2012/2/8 Kai Hackemesser > Hi there, > > we are still testing AciveMQ in preproduction here. Imagine following > situation: > > we have two topics here that work as a request/response pair. The data > producer is permanently(not durable) subscribed

strange topic subscriptions not disappearing [V5.5.1]

Hi there, we are still testing AciveMQ in preproduction here. Imagine following situation: we have two topics here that work as a request/response pair. The data producer is permanently(not durable) subscribed to the request topic and puts its payload into the response topic. The client uses a JM

Re: static network connection lost and not recreated

ally work alright. > You may want to configure for debug logging on org.apache.activemq.network > and inspect the logging output carefully when the bridge should get > restored. > > > Torsten Mielke > tors...@fusesource.com > tmie...@blogspot.com > > > On Fe

static network connection lost and not recreated

Hello, I have set up a static NC between two brokers of Version 5.5.1, and we have now seen twice within our preproduction test that the connection was lost and not reestablished automatically. We could not establish it through JMX using the NC's start operation but had to restart one or both brok

Network of brokers with an embedded broker?

Hi there, I made yesterday an experiment adding an embedded broker to an established network of standalone brokers (5.6 snapshot) the broker established a network connection. It was contacting the brokers sucessfully, but the network somehow did not get active - messages sent to topics on the netw

Re: Blocked consumers with ActiveMQ 5.5.1

I'm trying it now. 2012/1/13 exto > I had a issue which sounds very similar. I tried the same tests in 5.6, > they all passed. Have you tried 5.6 to see if the issue is still there? > > -- > View this message in context: > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Blocked-consumers-with-ActiveMQ

Blocked consumers with ActiveMQ 5.5.1

Hi, I'm doing a pre-production stress test on activeMQ and I have constantly issues with blocked consumers. Here is an example stack that I retrieved from the JMX console: Name: defaultMessageListenerContainer-1 State: TIMED_WAITING on java.lang.Object@574ff50a Total blocked: 2 Total waited: 5,

Network of Brokers with durable topic subscribers - switching broker not that easy?

Hello, there, I have a little problem here with my JMS layout. I have two brokers (A, B) on two machines, which are linked via network connector (static). The idea is that the producer can send to any broker and the consumer can listen to any broker and the topic to send to/receive from is availa