http://www.wmrichards.com/amqp.pdf
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 11:58 PM, Claus Ibsen claus.ib...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
Do you have a link to the article?
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 12:37 AM, Sean K sk92...@gmail.com wrote:
Has anyone responded to this article written by Mark Richards about
AMQP
Thanks.
These postings hits the Mark Richard's article right on the bull's eye.
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 6:01 AM, Christian Posta
christian.po...@gmail.com wrote:
Sean K,
Looks like you already got a response from James :)
But here's at least one discussion that took place a while ago about
Has anyone responded to this article written by Mark Richards about
AMQP and JMS (includes ActiveMQ)?
Specifically:
This means that message clients using AMQP are completely agnostic as
to which AMQP clients API or
AMQP message broker you are using. -- I remember hearing something
like that
are not
matching your Ldap server.
Regards
--
Dejan Bosanac
--
Red Hat, Inc.
FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
dbosa...@redhat.com
Twitter: @dejanb
Blog: http://sensatic.net
ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 1:36 AM, Sean K sk92
/camelContext
--
/beans
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 9:18 PM, Claus Ibsen claus.ib...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
Have you tried with the ActiveMQ 5.7.0 release?
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 2:09 AM, Sean K sk92...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I am working with the documentation on the activemq site
, or
cn=Directory Manager -- all of them results in the user not being
authenticated.
Any ideas?
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Sean K sk92...@gmail.com wrote:
I havent tried that yet.
But I think I am getting closer.
I took a vanilla activemq 5.6.0 bundle zip and expanded it on a
windows7
at
org.apache.activemq.jaas.LDAPLoginModule.open(LDAPLoginModule.java:437)^M
at
org.apache.activemq.jaas.LDAPLoginModule.authenticate(LDAPLoginModule.java:175)^M
... 26 more^M
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 3:48 PM, Sean K sk92...@gmail.com wrote:
And then on the broker side, here is the log
Hi,
I am working with the documentation on the activemq site for
configuring the LDAP.
http://activemq.apache.org/security.html -- almost everything is
copied verbatim except for hostnames and there were a few parameters
that were not writable by the current bean so I remove them -- for
example
I have two centos machines up and running. When I disable or turn
off iptables, the one broker can establish a transport bridge with the
other broker on the other centos machine.
I noticed that the port number being used changes -- 53033, 53067, etc..
How can I configure each broker in the
dynamic since that
port number changes as I restart the bridged brokers.
But where can I set that so that I can open up the firewall so that an
outside broker can connect to my broker?
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 12:12 PM, Sean K sk92...@gmail.com wrote:
I have two centos machines up
attached: activemq-centos-test1.xml for broker 1
attached: activemq-centos-test3.xml for broker 2.
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 3:46 PM, ceposta christian.po...@gmail.com wrote:
From your logs:
sk92129 wrote
2012-08-22 12:58:21,363 | INFO | Listening for connections at:
If it is duplex, it is not configurable to use a certain port or specific range?
For my case, I am not 100% certain at this time whether unidirectional
will work the the business case.
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 5:07 PM, ceposta christian.po...@gmail.com wrote:
The network connector in broker 2
So if I set broker centos-test3 as a unidirectional bridge- it cannot
be a consumer, only a producer on a queue.
how does real world deployments handle data going in both directions?
I can think of two ways:
1.) put the broker in a less restricted DMZ zone in a company with
less ports blocked.
13 matches
Mail list logo
