Hi
Artemis has already a similar feature to network of brokers. Its named
federation.
It is nearly now at feature parity, one last ticket feature left is retro
active consumers but that should be in next release of Artemis, its currently
in PR.
Artemis also has many features not exis
Justin i disagree many people use the replication to avoid a spof with shared
store and also perf with NVMe , simply having a shared store just for the
filelock sounds entirely sensible to me. I dont see why we would discourage
anyone in implementing that.
Get Outlook for Android
On Mon, Oct
Its about having clear direction as a project. Im not saying it has to be
artemis im not saying it has to be classic
But there does have to be a single and very clear direction so end users have a
clear understanding in the long term direction.
Having ever changing direction is worse tha
I think as a project we need to be clear in direction here with one roadmap. To
avoid users confusion.
I was on the understanding that as a community and PMC a roadmap was already
agreed.
And this was for artemis to become activemq 6 was agreed and once it has all
features (and more) of
A unit test would be best that way it can be reproduced. And any solution can
be verified as fixing the problem.
Get Outlook for Android
On Fri, Jul 5, 2019 at 4:02 PM +0100, "mschmeiser"
wrote:
I appreciate the discussion but this seems to have gotten off-topic from my
orig
A test case that recreates the issue is best next steps
Get Outlook for Android
On Fri, Jul 5, 2019 at 4:02 PM +0100, "mschmeiser"
wrote:
I appreciate the discussion but this seems to have gotten off-topic from my
original issue. The issue of durability and server restarts is
So next step is to make a unit test and jira so that it can be investigated
Get Outlook for Android
On Fri, Jul 5, 2019 at 1:37 PM +0100, "yw yw" wrote:
No, the message is not lost after restart.
于2019年7月5日周五 下午7:54写道：
> As asked previous, does the same occur if you have no
As asked previous, does the same occur if you have non destructive false, the
consumer receives the message but not acks it and restart is the message lost
there too?
Get Outlook for Android
On Fri, Jul 5, 2019 at 9:02 AM +0100, "yw yw" wrote:
Sorry for the ambiguousness. I
Have you done the same test with lvq and non destructive false (default) where
the consumer receives the message but doesnt ack it. Then restart broker.
If the message is lost there it would suggest issue in lvq or persistence.
Remember you need to set the queue to durable if you want it
Note non destructive, is regardless of the queue being lvq or normal.
Though primary case (but not only) for it is in conjunction with lvq.
Get Outlook for Android
On Fri, Jul 5, 2019 at 8:03 AM +0100,
wrote:
When non destructive is true the consumer ack ignored.
Whe
When non destructive is true the consumer ack ignored.
When non destructive is false (default) the consumer ack is honoured.
There is test cases for this and is used in real use cases.
Get Outlook for Android
On Fri, Jul 5, 2019 at 7:30 AM +0100, "yw yw" wrote:
Hi,
Jus
For lvq when non destructive is false consumers are meant to be able to remove
the message by acking.
Use case there is coalesced price updates where you just care about lastest
value, but the updates are faster than a consumer may deal with.
Behaviour is as expected.
Get Outlook for
Have you looked at the network health check
https://activemq.apache.org/components/artemis/documentation/latest/network-isolation.html
If you cannot add more nodes, but are getting split brain issues, this can help
reduce issues.
Basically you set some remote network ping addresses (lo
Star. Thank you
Get Outlook for Android
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 12:26 PM +, "Robbie Gemmell"
wrote:
I brought it to attention of Daniel from the infra team once he was
around on chat and he fixed thigns up swiftly, the repo is now back in
action.
Robbie
On Tue, 26 Mar 2
Thanks Robbie
Get Outlook for Android
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 9:43 AM +, "Robbie Gemmell"
wrote:
I also asked for assistance in infras chat but as expected though its
a bit quiet in there just now, likely need to wait until a little
later in the day.
Robbie
On Tue, 26
This is a mistake.
The PMC voted to deprecate apollo sub project. And i raised a ticket with infra
to do this. But whislt the title of the ticket was for apollo i accidentally
put artemis git in the comment (copy error). Confusing infra. I have already
messaged infra on the same ticket.
Journal is for storing persistent and transactional information in a WAL ,
where it is read on restart only to restate the broker e.g. when running its
only written to, but is quite heavily written to.
Paging is for moving data out of memory when needed, e.g. messages in queues
are not being
So my advice here based on your previous questions is to first start without
federation. It is something in a advanced setup and would expect someone with
experience only to be implementing.
Federation is about global WAN linking brokers.
Clustering is about have a group of LAN brokers tigh
If the brokers are not ha then the ack would return as soon as it has been
received and persisted by the broker you send to.
Get Outlook for Android
On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 8:07 PM +, "artemisn00b"
wrote:
Thanks for the detailed response..However, this is not an HA solut
This is the exact point of a messaging broker. That you hand control of the
message to it decoupling the producers from the consumers. As such you will get
an ack on the producer as soon as the broker receives the message and has met
the persistence and replication requirements that you configur
In 2.7.0 the feature called auto-delete is being added. This is configurable at
the address-setting level to default apply to all queues on the address and
able to be applied at the queue level for finer control.
This is alread in master and in the docs their should you want to read and see
21 matches
Mail list logo
