Re: [Spam: 5.0] Master Slave locking with MYSQL is not working with 4.1.1

2007-03-14 Thread naga007
thanks, will wait for the new build tommorow and give it a shot. James.Strachan wrote: > > Thanks. So it looks like AMQ-992 wasn't backported to the 4.1 branch > afterall (it was a JIRA editing bug :), so its currently only > available in 4.2-SNAPSHOT. > > I've just backported the code to the

Re: [Spam: 5.0] Master Slave locking with MYSQL is not working with 4.1.1

2007-03-14 Thread James Strachan
Thanks. So it looks like AMQ-992 wasn't backported to the 4.1 branch afterall (it was a JIRA editing bug :), so its currently only available in 4.2-SNAPSHOT. I've just backported the code to the 4.1 branch so it should appear in tomorrows nightly build. (Or if you're really keen you could try bui

Re: [Spam: 5.0] Master Slave locking with MYSQL is not working with 4.1.1

2007-03-14 Thread naga007
Here is the log on master Loading message broker from: xbean:activemq.xml INFO BrokerService - ActiveMQ 4.1.1 JMS Message Broker (localhost) is starting INFO BrokerService - For help or more information please see: http://incubator.apache.org/activemq/ INFO Man

Re: [Spam: 5.0] Master Slave locking with MYSQL is not working with 4.1.1

2007-03-14 Thread James Strachan
On 3/14/07, naga007 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Thare are no errors, but both become the master. Could you post the log please? I wonder which jdbc driver is being used (we try to auto-detect the driver and use the correct JDBC adapter based on the driver name) -- James --- http://radio.we

Re: [Spam: 5.0] Master Slave locking with MYSQL is not working with 4.1.1

2007-03-14 Thread naga007
Thare are no errors, but both become the master. James.Strachan wrote: > > Is there any kind of error in the log; or do both brokers just become > the master? > > On 3/14/07, naga007 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >> March 8th and used the following url >> http://people.apache.org/~chirin

Re: [Spam: 5.0] Master Slave locking with MYSQL is not working with 4.1.1

2007-03-14 Thread James Strachan
Is there any kind of error in the log; or do both brokers just become the master? On 3/14/07, naga007 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: March 8th and used the following url http://people.apache.org/~chirino/activemq-4.1.1-RC1/maven2/org/apache/activemq/apache-activemq/4.1.1/ James.Strachan wrote: >

Re: [Spam: 5.0] Master Slave locking with MYSQL is not working with 4.1.1

2007-03-14 Thread naga007
March 8th and used the following url http://people.apache.org/~chirino/activemq-4.1.1-RC1/maven2/org/apache/activemq/apache-activemq/4.1.1/ James.Strachan wrote: > > On 3/14/07, naga007 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Iam using mysql 5.1 and it seems like master slave lock issue is still >> n