your scenario. At a minimum you will
need to keep track of the bytes transferred so you can do the resume.
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Large-File-Transfer-tp23378044p28844082.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
.com/dejanb
Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/
ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/
Blog - http://www.nighttale.net
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 4:07 PM, kevinle92618 wrote:
>
> Hi Dejan,
>
> Currently we have a hard requirement to support large file transf
Hi Dejan,
Currently we have a hard requirement to support large file transfer resume.
We're very keen on using ActiveMQ, along with Camel, thus we must implement
this "resume" feature. I'm in the investigation stage but I was thinking of
implement this the follow w
ly {
> > if ( in != null ) {
> >in.close();
> > }
> > if ( outFile != null ) {
> >outFile.close();
> > }
> > conn = null;
> > }
> > }
> > System.out.println("transfer complete");
> > transferStatus.setStatus(TransferStatus.COMPLETE);
> >}
> >
> >
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://old.nabble.com/Large-File-Transfer-tp23378044p28836565.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
;in.close();
> }
> if ( outFile != null ) {
>outFile.close();
> }
> conn = null;
> }
> }
> System.out.println("transfer complete");
> transferStatus.setStatus(TransferStatus.COMPLETE);
>}
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Large-File-Transfer-tp23378044p28836565.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
if ( in != null ) {
in.close();
}
if ( outFile != null ) {
outFile.close();
}
conn = null;
}
}
System.out.println("transfer complete");
transferStatus.setStatus(TransferSt
lobMessage
> framework
> 2. Are there drawbacks to such an implementation that directed you to
> using the Jetty HTTP server for transfer?
>
> Thanks for any feedback or comments.
>
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Large-File-Transfer-tp23378044p28831914.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
[mailto:lou.par...@photomask.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2009 4:17 AM
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Subject: Large File Transfer
I have made some sample applications using ActiveMQ BlobMessage and
everything is working. I have a few questions regarding the best
implementation.
1. Since these are
BlobMessage framework
2. Are there drawbacks to such an implementation that directed you to using
the Jetty HTTP server for transfer?
Thanks for any feedback or comments.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Large-File-Transfer-tp23378044p23378044.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ
