to preserve message order across embedded
> brokers?
> Is master/slave setup w/ replicated data store a better option in this case
> or some type of distributed queue setup?
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.
> nabble.com/Message-Ordering
approach to preserve message order across embedded brokers?
Is master/slave setup w/ replicated data store a better option in this case
or some type of distributed queue setup?
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Message-Ordering-across-Networked-Brokers
n that under ideal scenario I was hoping to consistently
> see
> messages go to the same single consumer on either of the JVMs that
> registers
> itself against same JMSXGroupId irrespective where the producer is.
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://activem
/Message-Ordering-across-Networked-Brokers-tp4715070p4715071.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
riy
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Message-Ordering-across-Networked-Brokers-tp4715070.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
