://www.nabble.com/Performance-of-persistent-messages-tp25862425p25869764.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Yes - that would certainly have an impact on performance for
persistent messages :)
Rob Davies
http://twitter.com/rajdavies
I work here: http
performance?
When running this on the test server I got 145 syncs/second. It should be
mid-range SAN, but it must be something wrong with it.
I tested on high-end SAN and got 2300 syncs/second.
/Patrik
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Performance-of-persistent-messages
afford to lose any messages.
>>
>> I also tried the kahaPersistenceAdapter and it is amazingly fast. It
>> handles the load without any problems and the average latency in
>> producers to send a message is 2.5 ms. Is it persisting messages? Is it
>> reliable?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Patrik
>>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Performance-of-persistent-messages-tp25862425p25868321.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
ency in producers
> to send a message is 2.5 ms. Is it persisting messages? Is it reliable?
>
> Regards,
> Patrik
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Performance-of-persistent-messages-tp25862425p25862740.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
les
the load without any problems and the average latency in producers to send a
message is 2.5 ms. Is it persisting messages? Is it reliable?
Regards,
Patrik
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Performance-of-persistent-messages-tp25862425p25862425.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ
