Re: artemis cluster don't redistribute message

2015-10-31 Thread Clebert
Notice it would work with a topic subscription and filters. Queues are different. -- Clebert Suconic typing on the iPhone. > On Oct 31, 2015, at 10:43, Tim Bain wrote: > > ActiveMQ supports your use case. Artemis apparently does not, though I'd > love to hear why not. I can't speak for

Re: artemis cluster don't redistribute message

2015-10-31 Thread Clebert
I would like to see a test working on activemq 5. And we could then figure out how it was implemented Last time I checked it was the same. But for someone provide me a working test I will figure out how it works. -- Clebert Suconic typing on the iPhone. > On Oct 31, 2015, at 10:43, Tim B

Re: artemis cluster don't redistribute message

2015-10-31 Thread Tim Bain
ActiveMQ supports your use case. Artemis apparently does not, though I'd love to hear why not. I can't speak for other JMS providers since I haven't used them; you'd need to investigate them on a case-by-case basis rather than making the blanket assumption that they don't. On Oct 31, 2015 8:08 AM

Re: artemis cluster don't redistribute message

2015-10-31 Thread ohsgx
Thank you for your reply. I already 'redistribution-delay' configuration. If consumer B connect to Node A, consumer B get all producing messages produced down time (they remain node A queue). I can't understand this situation. There is no consistency. Artemis doesn't support message redistribut

Re: artemis cluster don't redistribute message

2015-10-30 Thread Tim Bain
quot; is about redistribution - at least how Artemis defines it. > Based on your comment it appears you have different ideas about what > "redistribution" and "first-time distribution" means. Can you clarify? > > > Justin > > - Original Message - >

Re: artemis cluster don't redistribute message

2015-10-30 Thread Clebert Suconic
; means. Can you clarify? > > > Justin > > - Original Message ----- > From: "Tim Bain" > To: "ActiveMQ Users" > Sent: Friday, October 30, 2015 8:31:20 AM > Subject: Re: artemis cluster don't redistribute message > > This isn't red

Re: artemis cluster don't redistribute message

2015-10-30 Thread Justin Bertram
st-time distribution" means. Can you clarify? Justin - Original Message - From: "Tim Bain" To: "ActiveMQ Users" Sent: Friday, October 30, 2015 8:31:20 AM Subject: Re: artemis cluster don't redistribute message This isn't redistribution, it'

Re: artemis cluster don't redistribute message

2015-10-30 Thread Tim Bain
This isn't redistribution, it's first-time distribution: the question is about messages produced while the queue consumer is disconnected. And that definitely does work in ActiveMQ. On Oct 29, 2015 9:14 PM, "Clebert Suconic" wrote: > Ah... based on selectors... > > I don't think ActiveMQ5 suppor

Re: artemis cluster don't redistribute message

2015-10-29 Thread Clebert Suconic
Ah... based on selectors... I don't think ActiveMQ5 supports it either.. it's a fundamental problem that usually goes against the messaging context. Most of times I have seen this pattern being used the Messaging system was being used for store & retrieve. I.e. a database like application. which

Re: artemis cluster don't redistribute message

2015-10-29 Thread Justin Bertram
As far as I know redistribution based on selectors is not currently supported in Artemis. Justin

Re: artemis cluster don't redistribute message

2015-10-29 Thread Clebert Suconic
did you look at examples/features/clustered/queue-message-redistribution under the distribution? that has the exact settings you need for that to happen. if you have any questions after that let us know. On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 10:12 PM, ohsgx wrote: > Hi. > I was clustering two artemis node, e

artemis cluster don't redistribute message

2015-10-29 Thread ohsgx
Hi. I was clustering two artemis node, each node was configured the same queue in broker.xml file. Producer A sends a message(with selector) to the node A. Consumer A connect to node A and consume message with selector (node = a), Consumer B connect to node B and consume message with selector (nod