On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 2:02 AM, jonathanq wrote:
>
> I think I found the solution in the documentation (that's what I get for
> finally posting a question - never fails I will find the answer 10 minutes
> later).
>
> This is waht I have now:
>
> from("direct:incoming")
> .choice()
>
Hi,
You can do some customer modification on the HttpClient through the
CamelHttpClientConfigurer interface.
public class AcceptSelfSignCertHttpClientConfigure implements
HttpClientConfigurer {
public void configureHttpClient(HttpClient client) {
// register the customer SSLFact
You can count on Camel in Action which is working in progress :)
linuca wrote:
Thanks Fintan! At first glance, this documentation looks really good!
I bought ActiveMQ in Action, and I think it is great, the examples are good.
But when I tried to use Camel... that is where I see the lack of
docu
I think I found the solution in the documentation (that's what I get for
finally posting a question - never fails I will find the answer 10 minutes
later).
This is waht I have now:
from("direct:incoming")
.choice()
.when(header("status").isEqualTo("1"))
I apologize if this is a simple question - but I just need to be sure!
I am developing this route that handles multiple message types and uses a
"when()" predicate to send the message to the appropriate processor based on
a header value. In the "Otherwise" case I want to send it to an unknown
fo
I'm trying to reason out an application design.
I have a "service" that I want to make available to "clients" via various
protocols (http, jms, mina, etc). I will need some adapter layers on the
"service" side to, eg, populate the http response code.
I would like remote clients to access to acce
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 5:24 PM, llecaroz wrote:
>
> Hello,
> I am really impresed by the capabilities of Apache Camel.
> I am creating a workflow with a similar route
>
> 1
>
>
>
Hello,
I am really impresed by the capabilities of Apache Camel.
I am creating a workflow with a similar route
1
out.txt
Hi
Try searching with google and ask on the AMQ forum.
Are you AMQ queue big enough to contain all this data? Do you have
consumers reading off the queues?
And AMQ have many parameters to configure it correctly.
Remember to report which AMQ version you are using.
And how big is the messages you
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 4:56 PM, Martin Krasser wrote:
>
> Their performance is almost the same. Generating 1 million UUIDs on my laptop
> takes about 3 seconds +/- 100ms. UUID tends to be a bit faster than Camel's
> UUIDGenerator.
>
Cool. I also guess SUN/Oracle can improve their UUID over time
Their performance is almost the same. Generating 1 million UUIDs on my laptop
takes about 3 seconds +/- 100ms. UUID tends to be a bit faster than Camel's
UUIDGenerator.
James.Strachan wrote:
>
> 2009/10/16 Guillaume Nodet :
>> Isn't the activemq uuid generator a lot faster ?
>
> Dunno - have n
Works perfect. Thanks very much Claus!
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/camel-jetty-to-handle-%22prefix%22-uri--tp25919650p25926725.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Thanks Fintan! At first glance, this documentation looks really good!
I bought ActiveMQ in Action, and I think it is great, the examples are good.
But when I tried to use Camel... that is where I see the lack of
documentation. What I expect in a manual is, not only the description of the
API and
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 2:30 PM, Jörn Kottmann wrote:
> Claus Ibsen wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 5:10 PM, Jörn Kottmann wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Claus Ibsen wrote:
>>>
Hi
You only have 1 consumer listening on the JMS topic
Try increasing this number.
>
Hi,
Did you deploy the servicemix-camel component into you ESB ?
Did the spring-dm bundles be resolved rightly ?
Willem
sailaja p wrote:
Hi All,
I am trying to invoke a webservice using the JBI Endpoint. I got into
problems. I goggled the errors, but no luck.
I have created a Bottom Up we
Using the scanner seems to work for parsing down the huge file based upon a
delimiter. However it appears that either the JmsTemplate I'm using to send
messages or ActiveMQ cannot keep pace.
Somewhere between 250K - 500K sends, I get this stack trace:
Exception in thread "main"
org.springframew
2009/10/16 Guillaume Nodet :
> Isn't the activemq uuid generator a lot faster ?
Dunno - have never benchmarked it.
I guess we could either make it configurable; or default to UUID if we
can't create the default IdGenerator
--
James
---
http://macstrac.blogspot.com/
Open Source Integration
Claus Ibsen wrote:
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 5:10 PM, Jörn Kottmann wrote:
Claus Ibsen wrote:
Hi
You only have 1 consumer listening on the JMS topic
Try increasing this number.
JMS Topics can only have one concurrent consumer,
so I guess I have to switch to a Queue, would
Isn't the activemq uuid generator a lot faster ?
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 13:37, James Strachan wrote:
> 2009/10/16 Martin Krasser :
>>
>> I'm trying to get camel-core running on Google App Engine. It doesn't run
>> out-of-the-box mainly because Camel's UUID generator. It uses InetAddress
>> that
The way you have your CXF endpoint configured you can only invoke on it via
soap/http. You should have a look at the cxf-camel-nmr example shipped with
the FUSE ESB distribution, it shows how you can expose a web service via the
NMR and invoke on it from a Camel route which appears to be more like
2009/10/16 Martin Krasser :
>
> I'm trying to get camel-core running on Google App Engine. It doesn't run
> out-of-the-box mainly because Camel's UUID generator. It uses InetAddress
> that is not on the JRE class whitelist. Replacing the implementation using
> Java's UUID class, I got a simple rout
Also, Progress Software provides free (beta) documentation on its fusesource
open source Web site: http://fuseeip.fusesource.org/documentation/index.html
and at http://fusesource.com/products/enterprise-camel/
These docs are currently at version 1.6, but they will be updated to 2.0 in
a few weeks
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 5:10 PM, Jörn Kottmann wrote:
> Claus Ibsen wrote:
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> You only have 1 consumer listening on the JMS topic
>>
>>
>> Try increasing this number.
>>
>
> JMS Topics can only have one concurrent consumer,
> so I guess I have to switch to a Queue, would it then
>
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 9:47 AM, Martin Krasser wrote:
>
> I'm trying to get camel-core running on Google App Engine. It doesn't run
> out-of-the-box mainly because Camel's UUID generator. It uses InetAddress
> that is not on the JRE class whitelist. Replacing the implementation using
> Java's UUI
I'm trying to get camel-core running on Google App Engine. It doesn't run
out-of-the-box mainly because Camel's UUID generator. It uses InetAddress
that is not on the JRE class whitelist. Replacing the implementation using
Java's UUID class, I got a simple route running.
Is there any special reas
25 matches
Mail list logo
