Charles, Claus
Thank you very much for your replies It was a great help and it worked
perfectly for me, I have also seen "nmr" documentation and I can see It will
use the same thread if we enable the synchronous mode while using the nmr
endpoint.
I am going to use "nmr" with synchronus mode in m
Thank you very much Claus, the application transaction issue is now resolved
with the direct-vm component. The good thing is that I am using the 2.10
version of camel from which this component has been introduced.
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Using-NMR-end
I am using JBoss Fuse 6 for deploying my integration application which is
composed of multiple bundles. For communication among the routes which are
in the separate bundles I am using "nmr" component. When I am calling the
NMR endpoint from one of my transacted route ,the called route through NMR
My Integration application is divided into two camel contexts. I am using NMR
to have integration between these two camel contexts. The flow is as follows
and I am using *INOnly* Message Exchange Pattern
1 CamelContext1-Route -> NMR -> CamelContext2-Route
2 CamelContext2-Route set some *new header
I have one camel route which is listening on an Activmq consumer endpoint and
calls another direct route which do some persistence work.
In the first route i have injected transaction policy which is using JMS
transaction manager and in the second route I have intected other
transaction policy whi
Thanks Claus
Now I think i have to use some thing else intead of aggregator as i cant
upgrate the version.
Thanks for your valuable support and time.
Neeraj Mahajan
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Aggregator-not-propagating-exception-back-in-camel-version-1
Neeraj Mahajan
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Aggregator-not-propagating-exception-back-in-camel-version-1-6-2-tp5717629p5717689.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Once aggregated result(exchange) is commited, the control does not come back
to the aggregation strategy. And also I dont want to handle the exception, I
need it to be progagated back from the aggregator component.
Thanks
Neeraj Mahajan
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5
Thanks again
So is there any way in camel 1.6.2, by which we can tell the aggregator not
to handle the exception.
Neeraj Mahajan
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Aggregator-not-propagating-exception-back-in-camel-version-1-6-2-tp5717629p5717683.html
Sent
issue.
Thanks
Neeraj Mahajan
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Aggregator-not-propagating-exception-back-in-camel-version-1-6-2-tp5717629p5717676.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
I am calling a route from Aggregator using direct component once aggregation
is complete.
When the called direct route throws any Exception I expect that aggregator
*should not handle* that exception, but the problem I am facing is that the
exception is being getting handled by the aggregator wh
11 matches
Mail list logo