Re: Using NMR endpoint in an Transacted route

2013-11-26 Thread Neeraj Mahajan
Charles, Claus Thank you very much for your replies It was a great help and it worked perfectly for me, I have also seen "nmr" documentation and I can see It will use the same thread if we enable the synchronous mode while using the nmr endpoint. I am going to use "nmr" with synchronus mode in m

Re: Using NMR endpoint in an Transacted route

2013-11-26 Thread Neeraj Mahajan
Thank you very much Claus, the application transaction issue is now resolved with the direct-vm component. The good thing is that I am using the 2.10 version of camel from which this component has been introduced. -- View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Using-NMR-end

Using NMR endpoint in an Transacted route

2013-11-25 Thread Neeraj Mahajan
I am using JBoss Fuse 6 for deploying my integration application which is composed of multiple bundles. For communication among the routes which are in the separate bundles I am using "nmr" component. When I am calling the NMR endpoint from one of my transacted route ,the called route through NMR

Message headers getting lost while using NMR

2013-11-18 Thread Neeraj Mahajan
My Integration application is divided into two camel contexts. I am using NMR to have integration between these two camel contexts. The flow is as follows and I am using *INOnly* Message Exchange Pattern 1 CamelContext1-Route -> NMR -> CamelContext2-Route 2 CamelContext2-Route set some *new header

Issue with using multiple transaction managers of different types on two different routes in same camel-context.xml

2013-02-22 Thread Neeraj Mahajan
I have one camel route which is listening on an Activmq consumer endpoint and calls another direct route which do some persistence work. In the first route i have injected transaction policy which is using JMS transaction manager and in the second route I have intected other transaction policy whi

Re: Aggregator not propagating exception back in camel version 1.6.2

2012-08-20 Thread Neeraj Mahajan
Thanks Claus Now I think i have to use some thing else intead of aggregator as i cant upgrate the version. Thanks for your valuable support and time. Neeraj Mahajan -- View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Aggregator-not-propagating-exception-back-in-camel-version-1

Re: Aggregator not propagating exception back in camel version 1.6.2

2012-08-20 Thread Neeraj Mahajan
Neeraj Mahajan -- View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Aggregator-not-propagating-exception-back-in-camel-version-1-6-2-tp5717629p5717689.html Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Aggregator not propagating exception back in camel version 1.6.2

2012-08-19 Thread Neeraj Mahajan
Once aggregated result(exchange) is commited, the control does not come back to the aggregation strategy. And also I dont want to handle the exception, I need it to be progagated back from the aggregator component. Thanks Neeraj Mahajan -- View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5

Re: Aggregator not propagating exception back in camel version 1.6.2

2012-08-19 Thread Neeraj Mahajan
Thanks again So is there any way in camel 1.6.2, by which we can tell the aggregator not to handle the exception. Neeraj Mahajan -- View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Aggregator-not-propagating-exception-back-in-camel-version-1-6-2-tp5717629p5717683.html Sent

Re: Aggregator not propagating exception back in camel version 1.6.2

2012-08-19 Thread Neeraj Mahajan
issue. Thanks Neeraj Mahajan -- View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Aggregator-not-propagating-exception-back-in-camel-version-1-6-2-tp5717629p5717676.html Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Aggregator not propagating exception back in camel version 1.6.2

2012-08-17 Thread Neeraj Mahajan
I am calling a route from Aggregator using direct component once aggregation is complete. When the called direct route throws any Exception I expect that aggregator *should not handle* that exception, but the problem I am facing is that the exception is being getting handled by the aggregator wh