ntar&action=start");
>
> So How could I accomplish it ??
>
> Thanks in advance
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Start-and-Stop-ActiveMQ-consuming-tp5791701.html
> Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
ow could I accomplish it ??
Thanks in advance
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Start-and-Stop-ActiveMQ-consuming-tp5791701.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
ued messages if there are some other
messages with "object_id=zzz" header, and just picking up the newer one -
and trashing others).
Thanks in advance,
Best regards.
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Camel-activemq-consuming-duplicate-newer-filtering-tp5
Hi,
I solved it as follows:
1. Each Broker -> One JMSTransactionMager with ConnectionPool.
2. Each Broker -> separated Route
3. Whole construction with SpringTransactionPolicy set in transacted()
4. Routes created & started at runtime
Best,
Stan
On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 5:32 PM, Quinn Stevenso
It sounds like you’re not using any other endpoints that support transactions,
so all you should need is the “transacted=true” URI - I don’t think you’ll need
an external transaction manager.
> On Feb 12, 2016, at 1:09 PM, Stanisław Kuś wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> 1. Each message from each Jms should
Hi,
1. Each message from each Jms should be processed in a separated
transaction and will be passed to a webservice. Additionaly basen on a
certain message part a file will be transfered from one ftp to another.
2. For each message independend from which broker it comes a new
transaction should b
Two questions -
- What are the other transaction endpoints you’ll be using?
- Will messages from both broker1 and broker2 be involved in the same
transaction?
> On Feb 12, 2016, at 1:19 AM, Stanisław Kuś wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> thanks for answering. I have two separate servers running ActiveMQ (
Hi,
thanks for answering. I have two separate servers running ActiveMQ ( my
datasources ) and a single Camel App that should consume from those 2
instances in a transactional way.
What I can do is from( broker1:queue:source,
broker2:queue:source).process( . The problem is what transaction
ma
You can always have two “from” clauses and route the exchange to a direct route
for the common processing.
from( “activemq1://queue1”).to( “direct://process );
from( “activemq2://queue2”).to( “direct://process );
from( “direct://process” )…….
Can you give a little more detail on what you’re try
Hi folks,
I have a short question :
Is it possible to consume from 2 different brokers within a single Route
with transactions.
something like form("activemq1:queue1", "activemq2:queue" )
Do I need to specify a separate transaction manager pro
ActiveMQConnectionFactory instance or is ther
10 matches
Mail list logo