Mostly a social issue, but I totally agree.
Also keep in mind when you compare options that Camel is a framework,
not a product and BPEL in this context actually means not the spec, but
a specific box-wrapped interpretation of it sold as a product.
$0.02 + tax
Hadrian
On 09/14/2012 09:55 AM,
rmance for heavy load activities.
Camel is the best solution you go for , even spring DSL configuration you
can do the same.
-Original Message-
From: Henryk Konsek [mailto:hekon...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2012 4:12 PM
To: users@camel.apache.org
Subject: Re: Camel vs BPEL
> To be honest, I see companies paying extraordinary sums to get hold of TIBCO,
> Oracle, WebMethods, etc. consultants. So they end up paying license +
> knowledge. With Camel, they only invest in knowledge.
Yeah, actually you always need to invest in knowledge. Thinking that
company might avoid t
ntext:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Camel-vs-BPEL-tp5719214p5719460.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
processes?
Regards,
Raúl.
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Camel-vs-BPEL-tp5719214p5719459.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
amel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Camel-vs-BPEL-tp5719214p5719439.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
;> -Original Message-
>> From: Henryk Konsek [mailto:hekon...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Friday, September 14, 2012 4:12 PM
>> To: users@camel.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: Camel vs BPEL
>>
>> > Hi, can anyone give some really good convincing stuff that why should
oad activities.
>
> Camel is the best solution you go for , even spring DSL configuration you
> can do the same.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Henryk Konsek [mailto:hekon...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, September 14, 2012 4:12 PM
> To: users@camel.apache.org
> Subject: R
@camel.apache.org
Subject: Re: Camel vs BPEL
> Hi, can anyone give some really good convincing stuff that why should
> we use camel over BPEL?
Call me stupid, but BPEL is too complex for me. :)
If I want to orchestrate two WS endpoints and perform some transformation on
the data, I would l
Something that's gelled from conversations I've had at my workplace is
that there's a perception difference between commercial software and
FOSS. Yes, I was one of those that, in this very thread, said
"Camel's a lot cheaper". But that's at least partly because I for one
use it in personal hobbie
> Hi, can anyone give some really good convincing stuff that why should we use
> camel over BPEL?
Call me stupid, but BPEL is too complex for me. :)
If I want to orchestrate two WS endpoints and perform some
transformation on the data, I would like to express this with a few
lines of DSL.
I'm te
to spend them
wisely in todays tough business.
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Camel-vs-BPEL-tp5719214p5719325.html
> Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Claus Ibsen
-
FuseSource
Email: cib
decisions
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Camel-vs-BPEL-tp5719214p5719325.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
; --
> View this message in context:
> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Camel-vs-BPEL-tp5719214.html
> Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
--
hanks
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Camel-vs-BPEL-tp5719214.html
> Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
--
;orchestrator'. any
> references, materials are good, and especially like to have some input from
> the gurus
>
> many thanks
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Camel-vs-BPEL-tp5719214.html
> Sent from the Camel - Use
; Hi, can anyone give some really good convincing stuff that why should
>> we
>> >> use
>> >> > camel over BPEL? I'm trying to convince somebody here to use camel
>> >> instead
>> >> > of oracle SOA 11g that has BPEL engine as so called
ing stuff that why should
> we
> >> use
> >> > camel over BPEL? I'm trying to convince somebody here to use camel
> >> instead
> >> > of oracle SOA 11g that has BPEL engine as so called 'orchestrator'.
> any
> >> > references, m
as BPEL engine as so called 'orchestrator'. any
>> > references, materials are good, and especially like to have some input
>> from
>> > the gurus
>> >
>> > many thanks
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > View this m
;
> > many thanks
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > View this message in context:
> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Camel-vs-BPEL-tp5719214.html
> > Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
>
> --
> Chris Snow -
> http://uk.linkedin.com/pub/chris-snow-mba-tech-mgmt-cissp/6/0/316
>
> the gurus
>
> many thanks
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Camel-vs-BPEL-tp5719214.html
> Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Chris Snow - http://uk.linkedin.com/pub/chris-snow-mba-tech-mgmt-cissp/6/0/316
have some input from
the gurus
many thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Camel-vs-BPEL-tp5719214.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
22 matches
Mail list logo
