> I have 2 queues provided by third party provider 1.request queue, 2.reply
> queue
>
> using camel jms i will send request to request queue, so third party provider
> will push respective response to response queue.
Ok.
> I would to make these calls synchronous. so for each request send to
> r
-Request-reply-scenario-with-separate-queues-for-request-and-response-tp5782754.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
req-rep eip and JMS stuff in camel to implement this. A hint or a pointer to
an example could be very helpfull. Thanx in advance.
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/JMS-Request-Reply-temp-queue-howto-tp5757404.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive
emp queues because a singlethreadexecuter is used) to zero allowing
stop() to propagate to ServiceSupport.
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/JMS-Request-Reply-DMLC-shutdown-tp5753465p5753536.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
()
isRunning() gets called resulting in a JmsEndpoint isRunning() returning
true from ServiceSupport.
Is there a way to get out of this shutdown loop?
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/JMS-Request-Reply-DMLC-shutdown-tp5753465p5753529.html
Sent from the Camel - Users
Dear Community,
camel seems to not shutdown the spring DMLC in a JMS Request Reply with
Camel Proxy scenario using:
Karaf 2.3.4
Spring 3.2.8
ActiveMQ 5.9.0
Setup like in tutorial http://camel.apache.org/tutorial-jmsremoting.html
Starting a bundle with temp queues is no problem and works like it
You can use a consumer template to consume from a queue, but if the
queue is shared, then you need a JMSSelector to pickup the message
with the JMSCorrelationID you expect.
You can then use a java bean etc, to send the message, and then use
the consumer template to consume the message.
And then ca
I've got a slightly awkward situation here. I've set up ServiceMix 4.5.3
with Camel 2.10.7, which is acting as a transformer and routing tool, and
has the following flow:
Receive message from CXF SOAP Web Service.
Transform message
Put message onto one of several WebSphere MQ Queues (using the MQ
Ohh! Great!
Why did I not think of that?!
BR Petter
Från: Claus Ibsen [claus.ib...@gmail.com]
Skickat: den 27 november 2013 11:09
Till: users@camel.apache.org
Ämne: Re: JMS request/reply - Exclusive Mode -shared reply queue - with
different request
Use the same endpoint, but set a header to override the destination to send to
See section _Reuse endpoint and send to different destinations
computed at runtime_
http://camel.apache.org/jms
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Petter Nordlander
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Anyone had any luck with sharing a r
Hi,
Anyone had any luck with sharing a reply queue in exclusive mode between
various request queues?
ie. by creating dynamic URI:s with
"jms:queue:?replyTo=REPLY.QUEUE&replyToType=Exclusive"
The URIs are invoked in a single route in a single camel context, but different
requests are routed to
uot;users@camel.apache.org<mailto:users@camel.apache.org>"
mailto:users@camel.apache.org>>
Subject: Re: Bug in JMS Request/Reply with CACHE_NONE and Temporary Queues
Hi
Logged a ticket to add validation to camel-jms to not allow CACHE_NONE
for temp queues
https://issues.apache.org/jira/b
th the session.
>
> On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 9:09 PM, Mike Pilone wrote:
>> I believe I found a bug in the JMS request/reply implementation if the
>> replyToCacheLevelName is set to CACHE_NONE in the JmsConfiguration. The
>> issue is that with CACHE_NONE, the DefaultMessageL
Yes dont use non cache for temporary queues as they are temporary and
only associated with the session.
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 9:09 PM, Mike Pilone wrote:
> I believe I found a bug in the JMS request/reply implementation if the
> replyToCacheLevelName is set to CACHE_NONE
I believe I found a bug in the JMS request/reply implementation if the
replyToCacheLevelName is set to CACHE_NONE in the JmsConfiguration. The
issue is that with CACHE_NONE, the DefaultMessageListenerContainer
superclass AbstractPollingMessageListenerContainer is responsible for
creating and
I have now fixed the leak, the by calling producerTemplate.stop();
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/JMS-request-reply-and-transactions-tp4933166p5732383.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
jms-mq:planRequestQueue
This only lets me drop the message on the requestQueue and does not even
connect to the reply queue. The reply message is just lying there on the
reply queue.
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/JMS-request-reply-and-transact
--
>
>
>
> Only 3 messages Ok being routed before re-creating producer.
> Yes, the route been idle for 20 hours
>
> Thanks
> François
>
>
> De : Claus Ibsen-2 [via Camel] [mailto:[hidden
> email]]
> Envoyé : vendredi 19 avril 2
>
>
>
> Only 3 messages Ok being routed before re-creating producer.
> Yes, the route been idle for 20 hours
>
> Thanks
> François
>
>
> De : Claus Ibsen-2 [via Camel]
> [mailto:ml-node+s465427n5731136...@n5.nabble.com]
> Envoyé : vendredi 19 avril 2013 09:09
] [mailto:ml-node+s465427n5731136...@n5.nabble.com]
Envoyé : vendredi 19 avril 2013 09:09
À : François Pascal
Objet : Re: JMS Request/Reply
Hi
Can you show details of the route with the request/reply?
And is there many messages being routed or few?
And before the 20h when re-creating the producer.
ançois
>
>
>
>
> De : Claus Ibsen-2 [via Camel]
> [mailto:ml-node+s465427n5730930...@n5.nabble.com]
> Envoyé : lundi 15 avril 2013 18:48
> À : François Pascal
> Objet : Re: JMS Request/Reply
>
> Not sure what happens. Do you stop/start the JMS route / consumer / or
&g
gards
François
De : Claus Ibsen-2 [via Camel] [mailto:ml-node+s465427n5730930...@n5.nabble.com]
Envoyé : lundi 15 avril 2013 18:48
À : François Pascal
Objet : Re: JMS Request/Reply
Not sure what happens. Do you stop/start the JMS route / consumer / or
anything, or do any changes in the application?
@n5.nabble.com]
Envoyé : lundi 15 avril 2013 18:48
À : François Pascal
Objet : Re: JMS Request/Reply
Not sure what happens. Do you stop/start the JMS route / consumer / or
anything, or do any changes in the application?
Also you can try upgrading to a newer Camel version.
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013
queue:T2P.ENROL.R as reply listener:
org.apache.camel.component.jms.reply.ExclusivePersistentQueueMessageListenerContainer@3c4cd18b
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/JMS-Request-Reply-tp5730897p5730933.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
hecker[T2P.ENROL.R]]
> org.apache.camel.support.DefaultTimeoutMap.run(DefaultTimeoutMap.java:157)
> TRACE org.apache.camel.component.jms.reply.CorrelationTimeoutMap - Running
> purge task to see if any entries has been timed out
> [2013-04-15 11:07:55,869] [Camel (Sae) thread #201 -
> JmsReplyManagerTimeoutChecker[T2P.ENROL.R]]
&g
Map - There
are 0 in the timeout map
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/JMS-Request-Reply-tp5730897.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
It makes no difference whether you use "jms" or "activemq" as component
name so long you are using the same component (ActiveMqComponent) in both
cases.
The ActiveMqComponent is based on the JmsComponent and "optimized" for
using ActiveMq. Both components support the same set of options.
Using "ex
vemq vs jms inn general ? Do the options
here no longer apply ?
http://camel.apache.org/jms.html
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/JMS-Request-Reply-not-working-with-temporary-queues-in-2-8-tp5723771p5723866.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
String uri = String.format("%s?exchangePattern=InOut",
> requestQueue);
>
> String uri =
> String.format("%s?exchangePattern=InOut&replyTo=%s&replyToType=Exclusive",
> requestQueue, replyQueue);
>
> String result = (String)template.requestBody(uri,
stBody(uri, data);
I'm using ActievMQ 5.5.1 on Windows 7 64 bit.
Thank you
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/JMS-Request-Reply-not-working-with-temporary-queues-in-2-8-tp5723771.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
ased on the correlation strategy,
> right?
>
> thanks
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/JMS-request-reply-and-aggregate-tp5720961p5721002.html
> Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com
> (http://Nabble.com).
.nabble.com/JMS-request-reply-and-aggregate-tp5720961p5721041.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
and what if i have n responses per 1 reply coming back to the reply queue?
the aggregator should take care of that based on the correlation strategy,
right?
thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/JMS-request-reply-and-aggregate-tp5720961p5721002.html
Sent
go off on a spring integration detour. And I know spring integration has a
> jms outbound gateway that does jms request reply. How do i aggregate the
> responses back and channel through the route?
>
> many thanks
>
Came JMS has built-in request/reply so you just do a
from X
to(Pat
has a
jms outbound gateway that does jms request reply. How do i aggregate the
responses back and channel through the route?
many thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/JMS-request-reply-and-aggregate-tp5720961.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list
ach.
> And read this FAQ about using getIn() or getOut():
> http://camel.apache.org/using-getin-or-getout-methods-on-exchange.html
>
> Best,
> Christian
>
>
> On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 10:24 PM, ravi.4indra wrote:
>
>> Hi ,
>>
>> I need some help with cam
r getOut():
http://camel.apache.org/using-getin-or-getout-methods-on-exchange.html
Best,
Christian
On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 10:24 PM, ravi.4indra wrote:
> Hi ,
>
> I need some help with camel JMS Request reply (InOUT)
>
> I want my aggregation method to generate new exchange from
Hi ,
I need some help with camel JMS Request reply (InOUT)
I want my aggregation method to generate new exchange from replyMessage(it
is the meesage in replyto Queue/response for my request message) and a dummy
bean which returns a object.
can the aggregationStartegy get the message from
> >
>> >
>> >
>> ${property.myBoolean}
>> > > />
>> > > type="java.lang.String" />
>>
contextPath="my.jaxb.soap.annotated.package"
> > encoding="UTF-8" />
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > JMSXAppID=IMSJCUSMQS00
> >javax.jms.IllegalStateException: Method setExceptionListener not
> permitted
> > at
> >org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFacto
>
> >ry.initializeBean(AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.java:1422)
> >
> >--
> >Vi
ner not permitted; nested exception is
>javax.jms.IllegalStateException: Method setExceptionListener not permitted
> at
>org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFacto
>ry.initializeBean(AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.java:1422)
>
>--
>View this mess
at
org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.initializeBean(AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.java:1422)
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Camel-JMS-Request-Reply-with-Websphere-tp5095847p5565080.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
e.com/Camel-JMS-Request-Reply-with-Websphere-tp5095847p5564702.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
ll,
> JMS_IBM_PutTime=00352903,
> JMSPriority=0,
> JMS_IBM_Encoding=785,
> JMS_IBM_Character_Set=IBM037,
> JMS_IBM_PutDate=20120314,
> JMSReplyTo=null,
> JMSCorrelationID=ID:414d51204d51545f44564a3130202020bfb2494f252ba34c,
> JMSMessageID=ID:c3e2d840d4d8e3d14040404040404040c94396fb9f26b
3339/mqErrors.zip mqErrors.zip
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Camel-JMS-Request-Reply-with-Websphere-tp5095847p5563339.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
27.n5.nabble.com/Camel-JMS-Request-Reply-with-Websphere-tp5095847p5112816.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Ibsen
To:
users@camel.apache.org
Date:
23/12/2011 06:40 PM
Subject:
Re: Camel JMS Request/Reply with Websphere
Hi
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 11:46 PM, Mark Borner
wrote:
>
> Hello:
>
> I'm trying to use Camel (v 2.6.0) JMS Request/Reply with Websphere 7
using
> Websphere MQ. I&
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 11:46 PM, Mark Borner wrote:
>
> I'm trying to use Camel (v 2.6.0) JMS Request/Reply with Websphere 7 using
> Websphere MQ. I'm successfully able to put the request message onto the
> queue using the following URI:
>
>
> jms:queue
Hi
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 11:46 PM, Mark Borner wrote:
>
> Hello:
>
> I'm trying to use Camel (v 2.6.0) JMS Request/Reply with Websphere 7 using
> Websphere MQ. I'm successfully able to put the request message onto the
> queue using the following URI:
Hello:
I'm trying to use Camel (v 2.6.0) JMS Request/Reply with Websphere 7 using
Websphere MQ. I'm successfully able to put the request message onto the
queue using the following URI:
jms:queue:inboundQueue?connectionFactory=#connectionFactory&taskExecutor=#taskExecutor&
, 25 Oct 2011 10:48:02 +0200
> Subject: Re: JMS request-reply and transactions
> From: wingtung.le...@gmail.com
> To: users@camel.apache.org
>
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 1:24 AM, Mathieu Lalonde wrote:
>
> > Try removing the from your route.
> > Normally, for I
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 1:24 AM, Mathieu Lalonde wrote:
> Try removing the from your route.
> Normally, for InOut, you should not send the response back explicitly.
> Camel takes care of that for you. :)
>
This solved my problem, thanks Mathieu!
I assume that the fixed echo route, detects the
Hi Tung,
Try removing the from your route.
Normally, for InOut, you should not send the response back explicitly. Camel
takes care of that for you. :)
Good luck.
Mathieu
> Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 18:21:02 +0200
> Subject: JMS request-rep
Hello,
I want to setup 2 separate routes in my camel context to create a
synchronous spring bean method, which triggers a JMS based request-reply
service.
The front (synchronous) bean is invoked via a simple Spring web MVC
controller, and dumps the response back to the browser. The second route,
changed between 2.4 and 2.5
> but
> > I really don't see anything that would have changed the response
> publishing
> > dynamic. The EndpointMessageListener and CamelJmsTemplate seem to be
> > largely the same. Even if those changed I don't see how t
e seem to be
> largely the same. Even if those changed I don't see how the underlying
> Spring CachingConnectionFactory would be exhibiting different behavior
> between Camel versions.
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/camel-2-5-JMS-Re
ageListener and CamelJmsTemplate seem to be
largely the same. Even if those changed I don't see how the underlying
Spring CachingConnectionFactory would be exhibiting different behavior
between Camel versions.
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/
't in the correlation map.
> > If I remove the shutdownRequestor bean from the route then as expected it
> > happily continues requesting/receiving responses forever.
> >
> > Perhaps the whole way I was going about implementing a "run once" route
> i
orever.
>
> Perhaps the whole way I was going about implementing a "run once" route is
> wrong to begin with. Is there a suitable way to do this that will work with
> the new 2.5.0 async request/reply?
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://camel.465427.n
ly?
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/issue-stopping-a-jms-request-reply-route-after-upgrading-to-2-5-0-tp3300620p3300620.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
You message still not going to the mailing list.
What version of Camel are you using?
And make sure that you send back a reply on QueueC. And use DEBUG logging to
see whats happening.
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/JMS-request-reply-in-middle-of-route
62 matches
Mail list logo
