Hi
I'm not sure about camel-firebase component. I updated camel-wmq to
3.15.x individually and most of the components, but I didn't test all
components.
Regards
JB
On Thu, Jun 9, 2022 at 10:54 AM Vyacheslav Boyko wrote:
>
> I've found this component on github
>
> htt
I've found this component on github
https://github.com/camel-extra/camel-extra/tree/master/components/camel-firebase/src/main/java/org/apache/camel/component/firebase
Will it work with Camel 3.15-3.17?
--
Vyacheslav Boyko
mailto:mail4...@gmail.com
to no-operation (NOP) logger implementation
>
> It seems to be missing the bundle felix.gogo.commands to work properly.
>
> https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.apache.felix/org.apache.felix.gogo.command
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 12:43 PM, pontus.ullgren [via Camel] <
&
lt;
ml-node+s465427n5796597...@n5.nabble.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Trying to blow some life into the camel-extra project and get a 2.18.x
> release out.
> However the karaf integration tests keep failing on Jenkins[1] without any
> clear indication on whats wrong. When I run locally t
Hello,
Trying to blow some life into the camel-extra project and get a 2.18.x
release out.
However the karaf integration tests keep failing on Jenkins[1] without any
clear indication on whats wrong. When I run locally the same maven build
passes with success.
A PR [2] or any other help would be
nt multiple targets - so to pick one
> > destination for the code move makes sense. However its not clear that we
> > have to keep camel-extra at SF - or why we couldn’t just move it to
> GitHub
> > ourselves ?
> >
> >
> > > On 4 Sep 2015, at 15:54, Pon
wnik Pontus Ullgren
> >> napisał:
> >>
> >>> Have not seen any other updates on the comdev mailing list no.
> >>>
> >>> Perhaps we should reach out to Daniel Gruno (that seems to be in charge
> >> of
> >>> the move) to g
n to SF - its
> understandable they wouldn’t want multiple targets - so to pick one
> destination for the code move makes sense. However its not clear that we
> have to keep camel-extra at SF - or why we couldn’t just move it to GitHub
> ourselves ?
>
>
> > On 4 Sep 2015, at 15:54, Pont
The way I read it is comdev are doing a mass migration to SF - its
understandable they wouldn’t want multiple targets - so to pick one destination
for the code move makes sense. However its not clear that we have to keep
camel-extra at SF - or why we couldn’t just move it to GitHub ourselves
gt; >>>> I think the question right now is the progress of the SF migration.
> >>>>
> >>>> // Pontus
> >>>>
> >>>> On Fri, 4 Sep 2015 at 09:18 Henryk Konsek wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Hi,
&g
ess of the SF migration.
>>>>
>>>> // Pontus
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, 4 Sep 2015 at 09:18 Henryk Konsek wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>>> As far as I know the Apache Extras projects are being moved to the...
>>>
lgren
napisał:
Have not seen any other updates on the comdev mailing list no.
Perhaps we should reach out to Daniel Gruno (that seems to be in charge
of
the move) to get a status update for camel-extra.
// Pontus
On Wed, 2 Sep 2015 at 23:57 Raul Kripalani wrote:
Hey guys,
Do we have an
gt; czw., 3.09.2015 o 20:38 użytkownik Pontus Ullgren
>>> napisał:
>>>
>>> Have not seen any other updates on the comdev mailing list no.
>>>>
>>>> Perhaps we should reach out to Daniel Gruno (that seems to be in charge
>>>>
>>
e
of
the move) to get a status update for camel-extra.
// Pontus
On Wed, 2 Sep 2015 at 23:57 Raul Kripalani wrote:
Hey guys,
Do we have an update on the ASF front about the Apache Extras
migration?
Users are asking for new releases of camel-extras components...
I quickly went through the C
k Pontus Ullgren
> napisał:
>
> > Have not seen any other updates on the comdev mailing list no.
> >
> > Perhaps we should reach out to Daniel Gruno (that seems to be in charge
> of
> > the move) to get a status update for camel-extra.
> >
> > // Pontus
>
the comdev mailing list no.
>
> Perhaps we should reach out to Daniel Gruno (that seems to be in charge of
> the move) to get a status update for camel-extra.
>
> // Pontus
>
> On Wed, 2 Sep 2015 at 23:57 Raul Kripalani wrote:
>
> > Hey guys,
> >
> > Do we hav
Have not seen any other updates on the comdev mailing list no.
Perhaps we should reach out to Daniel Gruno (that seems to be in charge of
the move) to get a status update for camel-extra.
// Pontus
On Wed, 2 Sep 2015 at 23:57 Raul Kripalani wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> Do we have an upda
3A%22org.apache-extras.camel-extra%22%20AND%20a%3A%22camel-jcifs%22
>
> Regards
> Rino
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Camel-extra-jcifs-for-camel-2-15-x-tp5771125.html
> Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
been discussed on the dev list[1][2] and the Apache
> > > community
> > > > development mailing list [2].
> > > >
> > > > Unfortuantly there does not seem to be any conclusion on this
> > discussion
> > > > yet.
> > > >
> > &g
.nabble.com/Camel-extra-jcifs-for-camel-2-15-x-tp5771125.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
gt;
> > >
> > > Yes this has been discussed on the dev list[1][2] and the Apache
> > community
> > > development mailing list [2].
> > >
> > > Unfortuantly there does not seem to be any conclusion on this
> discussion
> > > yet.
>
gt; >
> > Unfortuantly there does not seem to be any conclusion on this discussion
> > yet.
> >
> > // Pontus
> >
> > [1]
> >
> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Moving-camel-extra-to-github-tt5764066.html
> > [2]
> >
> http://camel.4654
on the dev list[1][2] and the Apache community
> development mailing list [2].
>
> Unfortuantly there does not seem to be any conclusion on this discussion
> yet.
>
> // Pontus
>
> [1]
> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Moving-camel-extra-to-github-tt5764066.html
> [2]
Yes this has been discussed on the dev list[1][2] and the Apache community
development mailing list [2].
Unfortuantly there does not seem to be any conclusion on this discussion
yet.
// Pontus
[1]
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Moving-camel-extra-to-github-tt5764066.html
[2]
http://camel
Now that the Google code site is about to switch to read only
(https://code.google.com/a/apache-extras.org/p/camel-extra/) I wondered
what is going to happen to the Camel Extras stuff?
Tim
Hi Bejjanki,
Have you included camel-hibernate jar file in your classpath ?
Regards,
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 10:29 PM, Bejjanki, Yuvanaga <
yuvanaga.bejja...@broadridge.com> wrote:
> Hi, iam getting below error.
>
> Failed to resolve endpoint:
> hibernate://com.broadridge.workflow.model.CaseM
Hi, iam getting below error.
Failed to resolve endpoint:
hibernate://com.broadridge.workflow.model.CaseMaster?delay=10s
due to: No component found with scheme: hibernate
Dependency specified is 'camel-hibernate:2.13.1'
This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the addres
Thanks for the invitation!
My original question was intended to get some feedback about the transfer of
existing Camel-Extra components [1] since I could not find any direct license
dependency to a non ASF 2.0 compliant version.
Camel-Extra is an affiliated project of ASF camel, hosting several
hecking regarding licenses of Camel-Extra components and
> figured, that we are currently not using any direct dependencies of any non
> ASF compliant licenses within the following components:
>
> camel-couchbase
> Couchbase itself remains under a proprietary and enterprise license, t
Hi,
I’ve done some checking regarding licenses of Camel-Extra components and
figured, that we are currently not using any direct dependencies of any non ASF
compliant licenses within the following components:
camel-couchbase
Couchbase itself remains under a proprietary and enterprise license
got it, thanks much!
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/camel-extra-tp3423991p3424079.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
ers or a bigger
issue that needs to be resolved (in which case I can follow up on that).
In the meantime this is the url for the code repository:
http://svn.codespot.com/a/apache-extras.org/camel-extra/
You can find the code there the 2.6.0 release tagged (yes, updated for 2.6.0)
and the binary distr
i'm having trouble accessing the camel-extra project. the project home is
there, but if i click on the source tab i get an error. if i try to access
the repository (release or snapshot) from the MavenRepo wiki page, i also
get an error.
i am using camel-hibernate from camel-extra, and am h
g.apache.camel.impl.DefaultCamelContext.getComponent(DefaultCamelContext.java:285)
> ... 40 more
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Download-camel-extra-Hibernate-component-tp3309301p3309312.html
> Sent from the Camel - Users mailin
t.java:285)
... 40 more
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Download-camel-extra-Hibernate-component-tp3309301p3309312.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
uild it?
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Download-camel-extra-Hibernate-component-tp3309301p3309301.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
36 matches
Mail list logo
