t be something that is crucial for many camel users using smpp?
> Are there any possible workarrounds to support smpp TRX with camel? Any
> other components that can serve as the smpp TRX endpoint in some way?
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://camel.46542
p TRX endpoint in some way?
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/camel-smpp-in-trx-mode-tp5724608p5748908.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/camel-smpp-in-trx-mode-tp5724608p5735017.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
In that case the endpoint will hold the session. What I am not sure is what
type of listener does one register with the Producer ? The listener does
require the processor .
-
~Sandeep
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/camel-smpp-in-trx-mode
use of "systemType" paramter ? I don't see any differentiation
in the code based on this parameter . Am I missing something ?
The possible values are "producer" , "consumer"
-
~Sandeep
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n
gt; The possible values are "producer" , "consumer"
>
>
>
> -
> ~Sandeep
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/camel-smpp-in-trx-mode-tp5724608p5734784.html
> Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
What is the use of "systemType" paramter ? I don't see any differentiation
in the code based on this parameter . Am I missing something ?
The possible values are "producer" , "consumer"
-
~Sandeep
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n
I logged a ticket: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-5963
Best,
Christian
On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Pontus Ullgren wrote:
> Agree, log and reject would be the best solution.
>
> // Pontus
>
> On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 12:01 PM, Christian Müller
> wrote:
> > Yes, it's possible t
Agree, log and reject would be the best solution.
// Pontus
On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 12:01 PM, Christian Müller
wrote:
> Yes, it's possible to share the jsmpp session, btw. we have to share it in
> this case (only one TRX connection is allowed).
> We could only log the received message, if no con
Yes, it's possible to share the jsmpp session, btw. we have to share it in
this case (only one TRX connection is allowed).
We could only log the received message, if no consumer route is defined.
But may be this is not suitable for most of our users.
We could also throw an exception at route/contex
Correction I was wrong on the direct endpoint restriction.
I was thinking about the log message that occurs when a exchange is
send to a direct endpoint without a consumer. So perhaps there is no
way to determine if there is a corresponding consuming endpoint at
start.
On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 11:
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 6:47 PM, Christian Müller
wrote:
> The smslib model is a bit different. The smslib camel consumer pull the
> short messages for the SMSC. And only if a consumer is defined (
> from("smslib://...") ).
> In the smpp Camel component, the SMPP library push the short messages (a
On Sunday, 13 January 2013, Christian Müller wrote:
> The smslib model is a bit different. The smslib camel consumer pull the
> short messages for the SMSC. And only if a consumer is defined (
> from("smslib://...") ).
> In the smpp Camel component, the SMPP library push the short messages (and
>
The smslib model is a bit different. The smslib camel consumer pull the
short messages for the SMSC. And only if a consumer is defined (
from("smslib://...") ).
In the smpp Camel component, the SMPP library push the short messages (and
delivery receipt messages) to the client if the client is conne
On 4 January 2013 17:26, Christian Müller wrote:
> I think we don't have another camel component where the endpoint is a
> consumer and producer. I'm not sure how/if it works or if we hit problems
> in other areas (exception handling, ...).
We do this for the camel-smslib component. The endpoint
> > Regards,
> > >
> > > Srinivas
>
>
> From my experience, some SMSC only allow single connection using TRX.
> I can't remember whether i have established TRX connection during my tests,
> but I remember that sometimes my outbound route also receive incoming sms
> if i add additional "to" destination
>
>
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > View this message in context:
> > >
> >
> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/camel-smpp-in-trx-mode-tp5724608p5724731.html
> > > Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
>
>
> --
> Johanes
>
--
ing my tests,
but I remember that sometimes my outbound route also receive incoming sms
if i add additional "to" destination
>
> >
> >
> > --
> > View this message in context:
> >
> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/camel-smpp-in-trx-mode-tp5724608p5724731.html
> > Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
--
Johanes
> View this message in context:
> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/camel-smpp-in-trx-mode-tp5724608p5724731.html
> Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
--
camel.
Regards,
Srinivas
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/camel-smpp-in-trx-mode-tp5724608p5724731.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
in TRX mode.
>
> Regards,
> Srinivas
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/camel-smpp-in-trx-mode-tp5724608.html
> Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
Hi camel users,
Please help on smpp client connected to operator smsc in trx mode.I have
only one smpp connectivity is given operator in TRX mode.
Regards,
Srinivas
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/camel-smpp-in-trx-mode-tp5724608.html
Sent from the Camel
21 matches
Mail list logo
