Hi, Soeren:
Thanks a lot for detailed explanations, really appreciated.
I now have enough initial info to ask for extra VLANs from our networking
group. Hopeful I’ll have a setup to get my hands on for some real test.
Have a good weekend.
Yiping
On 8/1/14, 4:14 PM, "Soeren Malchow" wrote:
>
On Aug 1, 2014, at 7:39 AM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
>
> On Jul 31, 2014, at 11:51 PM, Carlos Reátegui wrote:
>
>> Anyone out there using or have experience either/both of these that can
>> comment on pros and cons?
>>
>> Previously I was unsuccessful at getting awsapi working on 4.1 and o
Hi
Security groups can be iptables or ebtables respectively, but you can also
basically open everything in an out, the thing is, as soon as you use security
groups, the guest network becomes the public network, which makes things much
easier for an internal deployment, and I would not worry abo
Path is /opt/xensource/packages/iso/systemvm.iso
cheers!
Dean
On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 3:56 PM, Matthew Midgett
wrote:
> Dean where on XS did you find the .iso
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Dean Kamali
> Reply-to: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subj
Hi, Soeren:
Thanks for quick reply.
I have not tried any setup of advanced networking yet in my lab, due to
lack of available vlan setup in this environment. So I have lots of
questions on the actual steps and choices to be made during various steps.
First, using ³security group² implies using i
Dean where on XS did you find the .iso
-Original Message-
From: Dean Kamali
Reply-to: users@cloudstack.apache.org
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: SSVM Problem - ERROR: Java process not running. Try
restarting the SSVM.
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2014 15:03:34 -0400
Hey everyone,
I
Yiping,
take note of Eric suggestion, that link helped me back when I started
using Cloudstack; advance network setup was very confusing topic for me.
the confusing part is that you do not have to setup vlan on your hypervisor
machines only on your switch; Cloudstack will create vlans on your
hyp
Yiping,
ShapeBlue has a few good articles that lay out the infrastructure.
Zone, Pods, and Clusters:
http://shapeblue.com/citrix/cloudstack-architecture-overview/
Advanced Networking:
http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack/understanding-cloudstacks-physical-networkin
g-architecture/
PS. Thanks Geoff e
Dear Yiping,
If you choose "Advanced" with security groups, then you have only the
"guestnetwork", we do this geustnetwork on a bond and then on a bridge and the
uplinks to the bond are tagged (do not forget to assign a vlan tag during
setup), then you are able to create more tagged networks.
Hi, all:
I am doing planning of a CloudStack deployment using advanced networking. I
have a few questions about configurations:
1. Since this is an internal deployment, most of zones won’t really need
public IP, so how can I tell CS that I don’t need VLAN for public traffic ? Do
I still ne
Hey everyone,
I managed to fix it, I went over the troubleshooting guide once more, and I
found that #9 talked about similar error I was seeing, I had to delete
existing systemvm***.iso on each of my hosts and then then remove the host
from cloudstack and add it again, this will copy systemvm***.i
Hi,
i am running 4.3 right now with KVM and snapshots do work
cheers
soeren
-Original Message-
From: motty cruz [mailto:motty.c...@gmail.com]
Sent: Freitag, 1. August 2014 20:09
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: CS 4.2..1 hypervisor KVM migrate to CS 4.4 hyper-visor XenServer 6.2
Did you try to destroy the SSVM ?
it will get automatically recreated,
also, can you connect on the management server on port 8250 from the SSVM ?
telnet 8250
*Pierre-Luc DION*
Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions Architect
t 855.652.5683
*CloudOps* Votre partenaire infonuagique* | *
On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 6:35 AM, abhisek basu wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I am trying to run CS simulator (master branch latest). This setup is on
> cygwin running on Windows 8.1. Here is the error I am encountering:
>
> $ mvn -Pdeveloper,marvin.setup -Dmarvin.config=setup/dev/advanced.cfg -pl
> :clou
All,
I am figuring out best possible way to migrate from CS 4.2.1 hyper-visor
KVM to CS 4.4 hyper-visor XenServer 6.2
any suggestions? We're having issues with KVM, snapshot don't work, I have
a testing cluster for CS 4.4 with hyper-visor Xen and seem to be a lot
better than KVM
Thanks,
# *cat /etc/cloudstack-release *
Cloudstack Release 4.4.0 Wed Jul 30 15:11:52 UTC 2014
*# mount | column -t ( I don't see secondary storage mounted) *
sysfs on /sys
type sysfs (rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime)
proc
Thanks for the pointer. This issue is now resolved.
I installed ecdsa on cygwin using:
pip install ecdsa
Regards,
Abhisek
> From: santhosh.eduku...@citrix.com
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Running the cloudstack in simulator
> Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2014 05:23:39 +
>
> Bel
and "df" , the SSVM should have the secondary NFS share mounted, if it
doesn't try to mount it manually in /mnt as test.
*Pierre-Luc DION*
Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions Architect
t 855.652.5683
*CloudOps* Votre partenaire infonuagique* | *Cloud Solutions Experts
420 rue Guy *|
Could you log on to the SSVM and paste the contents of
/etc/cloudstack-release?
Erik
On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 6:04 PM, Dean Kamali wrote:
> Same error after redeployment
>
> # rpm -qa |grep cloudstack
> cloudstack-awsapi-4.4.0-NONOSS_3.el6.x86_64
> cloudstack-management-4.4.0-NONOSS_3.el6.x86_6
Same error after redeployment
# rpm -qa |grep cloudstack
cloudstack-awsapi-4.4.0-NONOSS_3.el6.x86_64
cloudstack-management-4.4.0-NONOSS_3.el6.x86_64
cloudstack-common-4.4.0-NONOSS_3.el6.x86_64
cloudstack-usage-4.4.0-NONOSS_3.el6.x86_64
# cat Cloudstack.repo
[apache-cloudstack]
name=Apache CloudSt
That's weird.
Could you try to destroy the ssvm and see if it happens after redeploy?
Also, could you get the output of:
rpm -qa | grep cloudstack
on your mgmt server?
Erik
On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 5:09 PM, Dean Kamali wrote:
> I have used the ones in http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/rhel/4.4/ ar
I have used the ones in http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/rhel/4.4/ are these
the right ones?
I'm only using xenserver with NFS link, no VMware or netapp in this setup.
On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 10:59 AM, Erik Weber wrote:
> It means you have a cloudstack-agent built with non-oss.
>
>
> Is this ins
It means you have a cloudstack-agent built with non-oss.
Is this installed with rpms from apt-get.eu or somewhere else?
Erik
On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 4:51 PM, Dean Kamali wrote:
> Hey Erik, thanks for the link, however I'm getting the following when
> checking /var/log/cloud.log on SSVM
>
> E
Hey Erik, thanks for the link, however I'm getting the following when
checking /var/log/cloud.log on SSVM
ERROR [cloud.agent.AgentShell] (main:null) Unable to start agent: Resource
class not found: com.cloud.storage.resource.PremiumSecondaryStorageResource
due to: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException
Template copied to
http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.4/systemvm64template-4.4.0-6-xen.vhd.bz2
Regards,
Rayees
-Original Message-
From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2014 11:26 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org; Rayees Namathponnan
Subject
On Jul 31, 2014, at 11:51 PM, Carlos Reátegui wrote:
> Anyone out there using or have experience either/both of these that can
> comment on pros and cons?
>
> Previously I was unsuccessful at getting awsapi working on 4.1 and only just
> today found out about ec2stack. I was going to give it
Dear all,
any idea how to change the host.cpu.model after the initial setup ?
We experienced that changing it after the initial installation breaks the
downloads on the secondary storage VM as well as live migration, for me that
indicates that the internal communication is not ok.
Any thoughts
Have you done the usual ssvm troubleshooting?
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/SSVM,+templates,+Secondary+storage+troubleshooting
Erik
On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 3:48 PM, Dean Kamali wrote:
> Hey everyone,
>
> I have installed SSVM template
>
> http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/
Hey everyone,
I have installed SSVM template
http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/systemvm/4.4/systemvm64template-4.4.0-6-xen.vhd.bz2
on another fresh install ( downloaded fresh packages and using clean
database).
SSVM boot fine, after connecting to secondary storage VM.
root@s-2-VM:~# /usr/bin/java -v
Hi Osamu,
The way LXC works is different than the usual VMs on hosts. For LXC containers
to run, it will need a rootfs and the container will share the same kernel as
the host.
While I’ve not yet tried running rootfs as ISO when creating/running user
instances but you can create rootfs templat
registering the template with requireshvm=false or executing the below query
worked for me
update vm_template set hvm=0 where id=‘TEMPLATE_ID’;
I don’t know what the flag does or why it doesn’t work with lxc.
~Rajani
On 01-Aug-2014, at 11:09 am, Osamu Ikehara wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am stack
Hi,
after that error, I can only destroy the virtual machine, I cannot
restart it via web interface.
I had looked inside the log files any trace of the error but have not
found anything.
These are the files I see, which of these I should see in the next test?
root@r-29-VM:~# ls -ltr /var/log/
Ugo,
Login to the VR and tail the messages log then attempt to start the VM, you
should see various messages re DHCP updating etc in the VR. If you don't see
the VR update try restarting the network Iain the 'cleanup' option, this will
create a new VR.
Regards
Geoff Higginbottom
CTO / Cloud
Hi Geoff,
I tried restarting r-29-VM but the problem is still blocking creation of
new VM in that isolated network.
Creating a new VM in another isolated network, it works. Where can I
look at to find the problem?
Il 31/07/2014 21:53, Geoff Higginbottom ha scritto:
Ugo,
Looks like CS is
34 matches
Mail list logo
