Re: 答复: unable to test Network Throttling.

Hi Star, Thanks for your reply. I'm using XenServer 6.2 and cloudstack 4.3.1. how can i check the band width rate of the VM, is there any command for xenserver host? waiting for your reply. Regards, Rajasekhar. On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 10:56 PM, Star Guo wrote: > > Hi, > > There is a priority: t

答复: unable to test Network Throttling.

Hi, There is a priority: the network rate of compute offering > the network rate of global configuration. If you deploy on kvm host, you can use virsh command to dumpxml of the VM and focus on ... . Best Regards, Star Guo -邮件原件- 发件人: raja sekhar [mailto:rajsekhar@gmail.com] 发送时

unable to test Network Throttling.

Hi all, i have created one compute offering(2 CPU , 4 GB) and given the Network Rate as 1024 Mb/s, a VM is deployed from that compute offering and in global settings i didn't changed any Network Throttling Rate(default 200 Mb/s) and i'm unable to test the network bandwidth rate. please suggest me

Re: Desktop as a service

> On Dec 5, 2014, at 11:08 PM, Tilak Raj Singh wrote: > > Hello Everybody, > > I am new to cloudstack so I dont know if I am going off the topic here. I > wished to know how to setup Virtual Desktop Interface (VDI) using > cloudstack. I browsed the net and found that openstack has the capabilit

Re: Port forwarding (web) - doesnt show real client IP

It sounds like some iptables rules got broken at some point for the static NAT, and since there's still a catch-all SNAT for outbound it gets caught by that and still keeps working, but is broken in a subtle way that goes unnoticed. On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 2:55 PM, Andrija Panic wrote: > And just

Re: Port forwarding (web) - doesnt show real client IP

And just to spice things a little bit, ALL remote connections appears to come from main Public IP of the VPC VR. So we can not block some stuff on firewall onVM (while doing port forwading) because all connections appear to come from main Public IP of the VPC VR. This is terrible design/bug - can

Port forwarding (web) - doesnt show real client IP

Hi, when doing port forwarding on VPC VR - port 80 - when some client access web site - only the main Public IP of the VPC is logged in apache access logs as remote IP. Why is this behaviour - and can this be changed ? My understanding is that this is kind of bug (unless needed for some other rea

Re: Load Balancing in cloudstack

Yeah i guess i am using basic networking...i didnt create any routers or network groups...i just installed cloudstack and entered private and guest ip addresses on the first run...then i created a vm and this defaultguestnetwork was automati ally created On 08-Dec-2014 1:52 PM, "Jayapal Reddy Uradi

[CVE-2014-7807] Apache CloudStack unauthenticated LDAP binds

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 CVE-2014-7807: Apache CloudStack unauthenticated LDAP binds CVSS: 7.5, AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P Vendors: The Apache Software Foundation Citrix, Inc. Versions Afffected: Apache CloudStack 4.3, 4.4 Description: Apache CloudStack may be configured

Re: 4.3.1 API issue with importing LDAP users

Created. CLOUDSTACK-8046. I¹d also like to point out that you may want to add ³LDAP² to the Components menu in JiraŠ -I On 12/6/14, 6:32 AM, "Ian Duffy" wrote: >Hi. > >Haven't looked at the code but it sounds like a casing issue. > >AD is case aware but not case sensitive. I'm unsure of the

XenServer 6.2: Other 64 bit template

Hello all, I have previously set up XenServer cluster under CS and registered FreeBSD under „Other 64 bit“ template. It worked fine in PV mode. Now I have stand-alone XenServer and can’t launch the same set up for FreeBSD manually. Can someone who is using XenServer under

[proposal] Purge Volumes instead of deleting them

Anybody interested ? https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7926 Best -- Andrija Panić

Re: KVM - VM snapshot (round 2)

With KVM - I understand that there are 2 steps in general. 1) libvirts save - which saves memory of running VM to a file 2) qemu-img to snapshot disks... AS for the KVM VM snapshoting - my understanding is that the code is not implemented at all, right ? On 8 December 2014 at 12:11, Vadim Kimlay

RE: Load Balancing Cloudstack Management Servers

Hi Glenn Assuming you are going to use the same Load Balancers for inbound access to the GUI by your customers, and you are going to put the SSL Cert on the LBs, then you need to load balance 443 which maps to 8080 on the Management Servers. If the same LBs are also handling the traffic from th

Re: Load Balancing Cloudstack Management Servers

shapeblue slides on ports: http://image.slidesharecdn.com/cloudstacknetworking-shapebluetechnicaldeepdive-130705132746-phpapp01/95/cloud-stack-networking-shapeblue-technical-deep-dive-60-638.jpg?cb=1373048954 8250/9090 = loadbalnced internaly only for client access 8080/8096/443 - loadbalanced exte

RE: KVM - VM snapshot (round 2)

CS does not support memory snapshots for XenServer. Disk snapshots are working. Not sure about VmWare, but I guess it should be the same. I thought the reachest feature-set is developed for KVM. But if it does not support memory snapshots - I wonder wich hypervisor does it ? This option at user

Load Balancing Cloudstack Management Servers

Good day, When trying to load balance two Cloudstack Management servers which ports should be exposed so that the management function will still work port 8080/443 port 8250 port 8096 Second question , just a confirmation if using two CS management server , a separate NFS server should be u

KVM - VM snapshot (round 2)

Hi guys, still wondering is there any interest into imlementing the VM snapshoot for KVM ? We desperately need it, so will try to contribute anyway we can (not me obviosuly, not a developer, but my colegues will). Can you give some guidance on this subject - I'm aware of the design documents her

Re: System VMs not starting

Another issue is that the system vm templates should be seeded on secondary not on primary. Looks like you have created the network on Xenserver for each traffic type. Cloudstack is again trying to setup the networks. google the error you will find some leads to debug it. Abhinandan Prateek M

Re: System VMs not starting

Please use: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/SSVM,+templates,+Secondary+storage+troubleshooting to troubleshoot SSVM connectivity... On 8 December 2014 at 11:20, Wikus van der Walt (RedArmour) < wvanderw...@redarmour.co.uk> wrote: > Thanks Abhi, Can you please be more speci

Re: System VMs not starting

Thanks Abhi, Can you please be more specific about what is bad about it? My primary storage NFS is on a separate segment from my Xen management network. In order to reach the storage NFS I create an external network on the Xenserver and assign an IP on that segment (vlan11). Is this not supporte

Re: System VMs not starting

The error is due to bad storage network on your Xenserver, give it another check. -abhi M +919701199011 | abhinandan.prat...@shapeblue.com On 08-Dec-2014, at 3:18 pm, Wikus van der Walt (RedArmour) mailto:wvanderw...@redarmour.co.uk>> wrote: Hi All,

System VMs not starting

Hi All, I have a simple lab setup: 1 x CSMS v4.4.1 and 1 X Xen v6.2. ccsm01 (10.10.0.16) cXen01 (10.10.0.14-mgmt, 10.10.1.14 storage). Xenserver network: nic0: management (vlan 10 access port) nic1: vlan interfaces vlans 2 (public), 11(storage), 12(guest) I followed the guide for Xen server sys

RE: Strange instance boot issue

Hi Allesandro, This is just a hunch, but could it be that Windows only uses its 1st CPU to handle the boot process. If this is the case when you allocate 4vCPU @ 500Mhz it only has 500Mhz of CPU power to process the very intensive boot process, vs having 2000Mhz when you allocate a single vCPU

Re: [DISCUSS] Any issues to be fixed for 4.3.1?

Hi Rohit, Here are a few issues (without resolution). Maybe you can help get a fix in time for 4.3.2 release: Snapshosts errors after upgrade 4.1.1 to 4.3.1: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8013 Failed to create a volume from snapshot: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOU

Re: Load Balancing in cloudstack

Hi Vadim, What you are saying is Internal LB, it is there only in the VPC. Thanks, Jayapal On 08-Dec-2014, at 12:52 PM, Vadim Kimlaychuk wrote: > As far as I know -- network offer with LB is only available for VPC and you > must expicitly select it for specific subnet. For shared network it