If would to change / add VPN protocol, I would suggest WiredGuard.
OpenVPN is great, but key-based installation is much more difficult /
painful to configure Windows Base Client. / Mobile Client (Android. IOS)
OpenVPN easier deployment is on Access Server , which is paid services (
correct me
2021-06-10 18:46:19,665 ERROR [kvm.storage.LibvirtStorageAdaptor]
(agentRequest-Handler-5:null) (logid:34e88890) Failed to create RBD storage
pool: org.libvirt.LibvirtException: failed to create the RBD IoCTX. Does the
pool 'rbd' exist?: No such file or directory
2021-06-10 18:46:19,666 ERROR
I removed all of my VMs and all volumes. I rebooted all the servers involved
in my cluster and now I see this:
2021-06-10 18:41:38,824 WARN [cloud.agent.Agent] (agentRequest-Handler-2:null)
(logid:4f4da278) Caught:
com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: Failed to create storage
Thanks. I’ll take a look table.
-jeremy
> On Jun 10, 2021, at 6:57 AM, Yordan Kostov wrote:
>
> Hello Jeremy,
>
>Once a shared network with DHCP offering is created the IPs fitting into
> the defined range are created in table called "user_ip_address".
>They are created one by one
Hello Jeremy,
Once a shared network with DHCP offering is created the IPs fitting
into the defined range are created in table called "user_ip_address".
They are created one by one so if range between x.x.x.x.11 and
x.x.x.210 is created this will add 200 entries. So if you want
OpenVPN support will be great. S2S
--
Stênio Firmino Filho
Chefe de Seção Técnica - SCINT - CETiSP
Superintendência de Tecnologia da Informação
Universidade de São Paulo
Av. Prof. Luciano Gualberto, travessa 3, 71
CEP 05.508-010 - São Paulo/SP
On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 8:46 AM Andrija Panic
+1
as it's, these days, a de facto standard for every VPN device/provider -
and there is great support with OpenVPN clients for all client Operating
Systems.
On Thu, 10 Jun 2021 at 11:24, Alex Mattioli
wrote:
> +1 on OpenVPN, and then a framework later on.
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
+1 on OpenVPN, and then a framework later on.
-Original Message-
From: Rohit Yadav
Sent: 10 June 2021 10:25
To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [DISCUSS] Moving to OpenVPN as the remote access VPN provider
All,
We've historically supported openswan
Hey!
I’m personally a strong proponent of Wireguard. A couple years back,
implementing a S2S or remote-access VPN with WG was complicated and it still is
- but there’s definitely more tooling available these days. There are clients
for just about every major platform - desktop and mobile.
In
All,
We've historically supported openswan and nowadays strongswan as the VPN
provider in VR for both site-to-site and remote access modes. After discussing
the situation with a few users and colleagues I learnt that OpenVPN is
generally far easier to use, have clients for most OS and
Hi David,
Thank you for your response and pointers. For now with your suggestion, as a
work around, I was able to skip the test and proceed with just source build by
adding -DskipTests in mvn command in cloud.spec file. It helped.
There are some java version mismatch errors in the source
Hi all,
when adding separate NFS storage (based on a ZFS pool) as primary/secondary
what is the minimum/safest file & folder permission you can get away with, when
used in conjunction with: chown -R root:root /tank?
chmod -R -f 755 /tank, or more restrictive chmod -R -f 644 /tank?
This is
12 matches
Mail list logo
