Re: Cloudstack GPU

Hi, I believe we have got the RTX 8000 arriving, and I was planning on testing with the Nvidia vGPU manager. Ed On Mon, 26 Jul 2021 at 15:41, Alex Mattioli wrote: > Hi Edward, > Which model of GPUs are you using? Going for passthrough? > Thanks > Alex > > > > > -Original Message- >

RE: Cloudstack GPU

Thanks Rohit, Those are the articles I'm basing my ideas on as well, looks like the only available alternative is passthrough, with it's limitations. Am wondering if anyone out there is actually running this in production. Cheers, Alex -Original Message- From: Rohit Yadav Sent:

RE: Cloudstack GPU

Hi Edward, Which model of GPUs are you using? Going for passthrough? Thanks Alex -Original Message- From: Edward St Pierre Sent: 26 July 2021 16:29 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Cloudstack GPU Hi, I am looking into implementing vGPU with KVM after reading this

RE: [!!Mass Mail]Re: Scale Running VM.

Hi all! I have same question. I can scale only CPU but not RAM. In Global Settings: enable.dynamic.scale.vm - true scale.retry - 2 In template: Dynamically Scalable - Yes XCP tools is installed. -Original Message- From: Harikrishna Patnala [mailto:harikrishna.patn...@shapeblue.com]

Re: Cloudstack GPU

Hi, I am looking into implementing vGPU with KVM after reading this article: https://lab.piszki.pl/cloudstack-kvm-and-running-vm-with-vgpu/ And checking out specific notes here: https://docs.nvidia.com/grid/latest/grid-vgpu-release-notes-generic-linux-kvm/index.html Ed On Mon, 26 Jul 2021 at

Re: Cloudstack GPU

Hi Alex, I've heard/seen some users using GPUs with XenServer for graphical rendering and I remember somebody discussing about GPU in KVM which is possible by using the extraconfig feature while deploying VM (the only limitation is on KVM you cannot share one GPU across VMs; however if your

Re: [DISCUSS] VMware network rate for network and VMs

Hi Vivek, Thank you for your response. I understand the scenarios you have explained but the issue I face right now is that portgroup for user VMs is not updated when network offering (with network rate difference) for that network is changed from ACS. I tried to show that here,

Re: [DISCUSS] VMware network rate for network and VMs

Hello Abhishek, Everything is useful and it completely depends on your requirements..! * Is having VM-level (using compute offering and global setting for VMs) useful? Having a higher network rate for VMs and a lower network rate for VRs(network) will make it useless. Ans - Yes definitely

Re: implement an authentication challenge method (such as Recaptcha) in the CloudStack UI

Hi Ahmed, We have a feature to restrict no. of user logins before the user is locked/disabled via the global setting incorrect.login.attempts.allowed. If you've comfortable with frontend programming, you can extend the VueJS based UI to implement/add the recaptcha solution (send a PR too!).

[DISCUSS] VMware network rate for network and VMs

Hi all, I've been working on fixing/refactoring VMware portgroup reconfigure on network offering change, https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/5181 While working on it I found different portgroups on the same VLAN can be used based on the different network rates used in the network offering

Re: Limit Host Resource.

Thank You Vivek will test it out. On 2021/07/26 06:17:07, Vivek Kumar wrote: > Hello Abhishek, > > You can achieve n+1 redundancy by putting limits on cluster level, Below are > the few settings which you can set on cluster level and global level as well. > So let’s say you have 4 host,

Re: Memory and CPU Failure

Thank You Vivek. On 2021/07/26 06:23:16, Vivek Kumar wrote: > Hello Abhishek, > > When you enable HA on your compute offering, CS will try to restart the VMs > on other available hosts as part of HA if any host goes down due to any > unplanned issue. You will also need to enable HA on your

Re: cloudstack-sysvmadm access to 8096

Hi Wei, Thanks for this. I still have it. I initially upgraded from 4.15 to 4.15.1 but it failed as I didn't have the template. I downgraded back to 4.15 and first noticed then. I had the 404 screen (as shown in your bug thread). I re upgraded back to 4.15.1 but still have it. Not the 404

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] New life to Terraform Provider CloudStack with Apache CloudStack project

That's great to know and thanks for all the efforts Rohit. For release management, I would like to volunteer myself for the RM. I'll create the first milestone and propose myself as RM on the mailing list. Regards, Harikrishna From: Rohit Yadav Sent: Monday,

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] New life to Terraform Provider CloudStack with Apache CloudStack project

All, The IP clearance process has finally passed (https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/5159) and codebase have been imported: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-go As an immediate next step, we need: * Minimal changes/fixes

Re: Memory and CPU Failure

Hello Abhishek, When you enable HA on your compute offering, CS will try to restart the VMs on other available hosts as part of HA if any host goes down due to any unplanned issue. You will also need to enable HA on your hypervisor side as well. This will only work if your host goes down (

Re: Limit Host Resource.

Hello Abhishek, You can achieve n+1 redundancy by putting limits on cluster level, Below are the few settings which you can set on cluster level and global level as well. So let’s say you have 4 host, then you can set limit on 70% for maintaining the n+1 redundancy.