Yeah. Started playing around with it a little bit in a test setup and while
adding the host to the cluster by modifying the script worked, it appears
that there's a number of things like binaries and their locations that are
keyed off of the host OS type. Appears that it might be easier to realign
I just stood up a Ubuntu cluster and started adding hosts to it while
decommissioning hosts from the Centos cluster and restarting virtual
machines onto it. The whole point of a cluster is that it is homogeneous
so that things like virtual machine migration can be assured to work.
There's no wa
OR you can modify the existing entries in the table to say "Ubuntu",
this might be easier actually as it doesn't require messing with the
shell script.
Be careful though as upon restart cloudstack-agent might check the OS
again and update the table, so keep an eye on it.
---
Nux
www.nux.ro
If you really know what you are doing and are confident can get yourself
out of a problem, then you can force Cloudstack to register your Ubuntu
new server as CentOS by editing this script on the hv (prior to host
addition):
/usr/share/cloudstack-common/scripts/vm/hypervisor/versions.sh
Once y
...and of course 30 seconds after I hit send on this message, I find the
very obvious line in the documentation about this. I was hoping I could add
these new servers to the same cluster and use maintenance mode to migrate
the KVM workloads over to the new hosts. Unfor, it appears my only
choice is
Hi,
Cloudstack tries to keep that demarcation between OSes so as to maintain
some sort of compatibility where software versions and capabilities are
concerned, for stability's sake.
That said, it can be bypassed in code, but it's best to do it like you
have already shown by using another pod.
I am working to transition the host OS for my Cloudstack 4.11.3 hosts from
CentOS to Ubuntu. I was able successfully bring up a new Ubuntu host with
Cloudstack and wanted to have it be part of an existing cluster, but after
attempting to add the server I'm noting the following warning in the agent
Hi Rohit,
Thank you for your response. It sounds like the path forward is Keycloak.
Would you have a link to a working Keycloak configuration?
Regards,
Antoine
> On Oct 13, 2022, at 4:21 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
>
> Hi Antoine,
>
> I know a lot of folks have used in the past (maybe not 20
Hi Tyler,
Great. Can you create a pull request on github ?
-Wei
On Thu, 13 Oct 2022 at 13:04, Tyler Wilson wrote:
> Hello Wei,
>
> This is in 4.17. I was able to get around it by modifying
> updateKeyPairs() and adding a check for the docker env in
> ConfigurationServerImpl.java since docker
Hello Wei,
This is in 4.17. I was able to get around it by modifying
updateKeyPairs() and adding a check for the docker env in
ConfigurationServerImpl.java since docker runs as the root user, this
will be prematurely returned if its not fixed;
Path p = Paths.get("/.dockerenv");
Bo
Hi Antoine,
I know a lot of folks have used in the past (maybe not 2022) and also used
keycloak. Can you check if ADFS allows the username attribute to be configured?
See
https://rajanikaruturi.blogspot.com/2018/10/configuring-adfs-sso-with-apache.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kTvNbf-KFH0
11 matches
Mail list logo
