Indeed, Xenserver is good and our primary choice. We allready have it up and
running..
Why i ask KVM cluster its cloudstack lacks kubernetes csi driver support for
xenserver.
And we want to use kubernetes. My idea is just make one kvm cluster for
kubernetes users.
Of cource we will check
We once tried to setup PCS cluster with GFS2 In production, and it required a
lot of expertise to manage PCS cluster and our experience was very bad with
that too, after a year we had to move to NFS due to so many issue. FC works
better XenServer, We had almost for 5-6 year with Xenserver And
Hi Ian,
Yes. In this case, the ACS management server doesn’t need any additional
configuration but you’ll have to take care of CPVM and SSVM (optionally) like
Ruben suggested. Also see [1] where you should have a CA signed one instead.
[1] https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/9013
Hi Wido,
I'm currently running Rocky Linux 9 for the HV.
> Why are you setting anything on cloudbr0? There is no need to create cloudbr0
> with VXLAN.
cloudbr0 is just a naming choice on my end. Is it okay for me to use something
like NetworkManager to create the bridge?
So, no need to
Hi Ruben,
Thanks for the info, do you mean running ACME on the reverse proxy? Anything
needing to be configured on the ACS management server?
Thanks
Ian
-Original Message-
From: Ruben Bosch
Sent: 20 May 2024 23:38
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Let's Encrypt
Ian, this is easily achievable by means of an ACME client (Certbot) and
running ACS management behind a reverse proxy. You can write a hook to
upload a certificate to the CPVM as well. (
https://cloudstack.apache.org/api/apidocs-4.16/apis/uploadCustomCertificate.html)
Just be mindful that the CPVM
Take a look here https://github.com/CLDIN/packer-templates/ :)
On Mon, May 20, 2024 at 2:32 PM Francisco Arencibia Quesada <
arencibia.franci...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thank you very much Alex
>
> Regards
>
> *Francisco Arencibia Quesada.*
> *DevOps Engineer*
>
>
> On Mon, 20 May 2024 at 14:30,
Hi Hanis,
See my reply inline.
Op 17/05/2024 om 12:38 schreef Hanis Irfan:
I think this is more about BGP EVPN than CloudStack but would appreciate
anyone that could help. So basically, I’ve tried the Advanced Networking
with VLAN isolation for my POC and now want to migrate to VXLAN.
I
Op 20/05/2024 om 14:45 schreef Alex Mattioli:
Hi Alex,
In this scenario:
I think adding the ability to add network specific peers as mentioned in one of
>your prior replies would still allow the level of control some operators (myself
>included) may desire.
How do you propose network
We're running FC with OCFS2 (OS: Oracle Linux 9) on a demo 2 node cluster.
Works kind of nice, but of course is not the same as ESXi. For now it works
well enough but expanding that to a actual >10 node setup with hundreds of VMs
doesn't feel right.
Am Mon, May 20, 2024 at 03:48:12PM +0300
Welp, that did it, fixed... its in a lab we own so 3 people have access.
thanks
On Monday 20 May 2024 09:18:46 PM (+07:00), Wei ZHOU wrote:
> If you use 4.19.0.1/4.18.2.0/4.18.1.1, URL redirection is disabled by
> default due to security reasons.
>
> Please search global setting by keyword
Hello,
You should be able to upload an ISO via CLI using CloudMonkey and cURL:
1. Via CloudMonkey, call the `getUploadParamsForIso` API in order to
obtain the parameters that will be used for upload.
```
(admin) > get uploadparamsforiso name=
displaytext= format="iso" zoneid=
```
The
If you use 4.19.0.1/4.18.2.0/4.18.1.1, URL redirection is disabled by
default due to security reasons.
Please search global setting by keyword "follow.redirect" and update the
value to true then retry.
-Wei
On Monday, May 20, 2024, Embedded Devel
wrote:
> trying to download debian iso from
If you are 100% FC/NVME then OCFS2 is probably the best (or least bad) option.
I personally always tried to stick to NFS for KVM, it just works.
Reliability wise, I personally consider CEPH to be more reliable (and
supportable) than OCFS2.
Regards
Alex
From: Kristian Liivak
Sent: Monday, May
trying to download debian iso from
https://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/12.5.0/amd64/iso-cd/debian-12.5.0-amd64-netinst.iso
via the register iso button fails with
Failed to download
https://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/12.5.0/amd64/iso-cd/debian-12.5.0-amd64-netinst.iso
due to redirection,
Hello Kristian,
Take this perspective with a grain of salt given our time spent on this was in
a proof-of-concept deployment.
We tested iSCSI connectivity with OCFS2 as the underlying technology to provide
the shared mount point. We found that throughout the course of host reboots,
the
Hi,
Are there any plans to implement Let's Encrypt with CS? More so securing the
Management console and Proxy.
Thanks
Ian
Hi All
Currently, we can see from the documentation that KVM supports Fiber Channel
via shared mountpoints.
Can someone recommend or share their experience with usable solutions for
shared mountpoint technical solutions? It seems there are quite a few options,
such as shared/clustered file
Hi Alex,
In this scenario:
>I think adding the ability to add network specific peers as mentioned in one
>of >your prior replies would still allow the level of control some operators
>(myself >included) may desire.
How do you propose network specific peers to be implemented?
Regards
Alex
Thank you very much Alex
Regards
*Francisco Arencibia Quesada.*
*DevOps Engineer*
On Mon, 20 May 2024 at 14:30, Dietrich, Alex
wrote:
> Hi Francisco,
>
> I have found the existing Linux template guides as still valid for Ubuntu
> 22.04 LTS template creation.
>
> There are some broken links
Hi Francisco,
I have found the existing Linux template guides as still valid for Ubuntu 22.04
LTS template creation.
There are some broken links in the documentation provided by CloudStack, but I
essentially completed it with the following articles:
*
Hi Alex,
This may be a difference in perspective in implementation of BGP at the tenant
level. I see the ability this would provide to seamlessly establishing those
peering relationships with minimal intervention (helping scalability).
I think adding the ability to add network specific peers
Hi Alex,
> I am not convinced that specifying BGP peers at the zone level is a good idea
> given the impacts BGP can have on a given network. I would much rather see
> both peer and AS specification handled at the >network configuration, or
> another more specific level.
I don't see how else
Good morning guys,
Do you have any updated guide to create ubuntu templates for cloudstack?
I'm testing some, but I can't find an updated one for 22.04TLS
Regards
Thanks in advance
--
*Francisco Arencibia Quesada.*
*DevOps Engineer*
Hi Wido,
Thanks for the feedback, comments below:
> I would suggest that the upstream router (Juniper, Frr, etc) should then use
> Dynamic BGP neihbors.
That's the plan.
> I do suggest we add BGP passwords/encryption from the start for safety
> reasons.
That's very likely to be there from
On Mon, May 20, 2024 at 10:47 AM Wei ZHOU wrote:
> What type of zone and network do you use ?
>
I have tried both edge and core/advanced zones with KVM as hypervisor and
OVS switching as the underlying network stack. Now testing with
core-advanced zone. I have configured several traffic types
What type of zone and network do you use ?
Try network with vlan = "vlan://untagged"
On Friday, May 17, 2024, Alex K wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Is it possible to create untagged guest networks in cloudstack and have
> them assigned to different OVS bridges?
>
> I have created several OVS bridges
I understand this is not possible in cloudstack?
On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 3:57 PM Alex K wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Is it possible to create untagged guest networks in cloudstack and have
> them assigned to different OVS bridges?
>
> I have created several OVS bridges at the KVM host and then tried to
28 matches
Mail list logo
