Unfortunately it¹s not. You could remove all the VMs, destroy the network,
Hopefully the shared network VLAN is within your VLAN range for you
Isolated Zone, and you would have the then recreate it.
It¹s more difficult then I think you are probably looking to do.
Better would be to add a second N
Vibranze,
Do you have errors further up in the log that could explain why the
Virtual Router didn¹t start?
Thanks
Matt
On 9/14/14, 11:06 PM, "Vibranze Teh" wrote:
>Dear lists,
>
>I tried to create a VM but it failed to create then I tried to start
>another VM; it failed to start as well.
Amin,
Go in to Global Settings -> storage.max.volume.size and reset it above
1024.
Thanks,
Matt Mullins
Cloud Architect
Americas Cloud Consulting Citrix System, Inc.
+1 (407) 920-1107 Office/Cell Phone
matt.mull...@citrix.com
On 7/4/14, 2:16 AM, "Amin Samir" wrote:
>Hello,
>
>
>Has
John,
I think the problem here is that the VR has a IP allocated on the Shared
network, and that has to be removed before the shared network can be
deleted. Everything has to be off the network before you can remove a
network.
You can delete the VR and make sure there are no other NICs allocate
Dave,
I don't believe we have it anywhere that this is able to resize the root
volume. Where are you seeing this in the documentation?
This feature is only for resizing Data volumes at this time.
Cheers,
Matt
On 9/13/13 4:13 PM, "Dave Cundiff" wrote:
>On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 10:18 PM, Joe B
>>--
>> Yu-Heng (Ryan) Lei, Associate Reasearcher
>> Chunghwa Telecom Laboratories / Cloud Computing Laboratory
>>
>>ryan...@cht.com.tw<https://email.cht.com.tw/owa/redir.aspx?C=-wE1FEC3G0SW
>>YpVkiWo8SsDdf3ZqO9AIuAPTzRnFYCUi-z4YljtI_hyVK
- Multi-list send since this is a community wide announcement
Just a reminder, the community news blog is moving to being published on
Wednesdays starting this week on July 10! This is to make it more timely with
the data that we are working on throughout the week.
Please make sure to have any
Hi Brandon,
My question is what changes would you look at making and what would the
use case be?
As for making them persistent, that is nearly impossible since they are
part of the template and they will get overridden upon reboot.
Thanks,
Matt
On 4/30/13 8:56 AM, "Brandon Arms" wrote:
>Ha
Did you make sure that your CPU can support the number of MHz that you have on
the offering?
On Apr 29, 2013, at 7:48 PM, "Maurice Lawler" wrote:
> Hello:
>
> Where can I change / update where it is suggested the maximum amount of RAM /
> Core the compute offering allows.
>
> I have 16 Core
Here's a full list the Rohit put up, and I've updated some up on the wiki.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Ports+used+by+CloudS
tack
On 4/29/13 5:16 PM, "Kelven Yang" wrote:
>If you are running mysql together with management server in one box, you
>will see mysql's port,
optimization?
>
> Warren
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Mathias Mullins [mailto:mathias.mull...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2013 4:57 PM
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: VM management
>
> If your going to do work on the local OS
les for this?
>
>Warren
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Mathias Mullins [mailto:mathias.mull...@citrix.com]
>Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2013 4:38 PM
>To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
>Subject: Re: VM management
>
>What do you mean by Manging it Warren?
>
>Thanks,
What do you mean by Manging it Warren?
Thanks,
Matt
On 4/24/13 2:12 PM, "Warren Nicholson"
wrote:
>Is it permissible to manage VM's using XenCenter
>
>while Cloud-Management is running?
>
>
>
>Warren
>
>
>
There is, I'll have to work on the SQL statement later today for you.
What's the ID of your network offering that you are using?
Thanks,
Matt
On 4/23/13 9:56 AM, "David Ortiz" wrote:
>Matt,
>That sounds like exactly what I am going for. Is there a way to
>disable dns on a network/virtual
David,
I've done a lot of installs with AD. Your best bet is to just remove the
the DNS function from the virtual router. Leave DHCP in place, don't have
that be taken over by external DHCP as it will cause issues.
Also tweaking the dnsmasq is a short term fix as it will only go away once
the VR
Hi Warren,
Go into your new database and run:
Update vm_instances set state = "stopped" where id = #;
# is the is id # in s-#-VM.
Then you have two choices. 1 you can just start it from there and let it
recreate. Or 2. Destroy it and let the cloud rebuild it.
Hope that helps,
Matt
On Apr 2
I think it should be noted that this feature is currently only available
with the NetScaler load balancer. This is not a CS standalone feature if
that is what you are looking for Wang.
Matt
On 4/18/13 12:49 PM, "Geoff Higginbottom"
wrote:
>Hi Wang,
>
>I guess you might be right, and if so the
the use of professional services, however, would like to have a
>better understanding to help make an educated choice.
>
>Robert
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Mathias Mullins [mailto:mathias.mull...@citrix.com]
>Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2013 10:40 AM
>To: users@clouds
Valery,
Currently that is a root admin function only. I believe there are
enhancements in progress for that to change.
Matt
On 4/18/13 12:33 PM, "Valery Ciareszka" wrote:
>Hi all.
>
>Is it possible for domain admin account/user account to change its name +
>generate api keys in cloudstack ?
Robert,
It sounds like you are talking about more the Citrix CloudPlatform upgrade
path.
>From a CloudStack upgrade path, you would be looking at going from 2.2.14
-> 3.0.2 -> 4.0.1.
Personally I would suggest brining up your CentOS at the same time as
there are going to be a number of patches
Better yet, did you open your iptables for port 8135 and 9090? That's usually
when see those errors.
Thank you,
Matt
On Apr 9, 2013, at 7:54 PM, "Ahmad Emneina" wrote:
> did you change your host parameter in the global config to 0.0.0.0? it
> should be set to the actual ip of the host, hosti
Have we ever thought of having an announce@ like Apache does?
Thanks,
Matt
On 3/26/13 4:15 PM, "Joe Brockmeier" wrote:
>On Fri, Mar 22, 2013, at 04:39 PM, Bryan Whitehead wrote:
>> I would like to see them. I also wouldn't mind a separate list for such
>> things.
>>
>> It is pretty annoying t
22 matches
Mail list logo
