Thank you Paul, its a good proposal.
This is a really piece to get a global solution. I think that it should be
treated like load balancer, where Cloudstack offers a simple, but useful
solution, and Cloudstack allows to integrate dedicated solutions like F5.
In fact, Cloudstack just offers a glob
Hello Daniel,
We have the same environment, and the same problem.
I agree, the volume snapshots are a pain in time needings. Volume snapshot
does a full copy of the volume through the network from primary storage to
the secondary. May be there is a storage configuration that could optimize
this ac
Good!
Thanks for sharing it, nice iniciative!
We have to upgrade the VMware clusters, but vmware is changing daily the
patch policy...
Once done I will try to remember to share too.
Regards.
Atentamente,
Sebastián Gómez
On Sat, Jan 13, 2018 at 5:59 AM, Ivan Kudryavtsev
wrote:
> Hi, coll
,
>
> Paul Angus
>
> paul.an...@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
> @shapeblue
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Sebastian Gomez [mailto:tioc...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 28 December 2017 08:08
> To: users@cloud
Hi all.
I had a similar problem, but usign XenServer 7.2. It was a fresh
installation from scratch. The system vms where created, but them *could'nt
get the local link IP*, so the cloudstack agent never went up.
After that, I found the compatibility matrix, where its specified that the
compatible
got it to
> > work for password, password-reset, sshkey and sshkey-reset. It also
> > support user-data, and provide an easy way to manage a different user
> than root.
> >
> > I think our community documentation need an update on this topic...
> >
> > Cheers,
for password, password-reset, sshkey and sshkey-reset. It also support
> user-data, and provide an easy way to manage a different user than root.
>
> I think our community documentation need an update on this topic...
>
> Cheers,
>
> Le 28 août 2017 5:29 PM, "Sebastian Gomez"
Puppet/Chef/Ansible will not help you to optimize the current task of
migrating your servers from AWS to CS, but will reduce you if you have to
do it again in the future. If you have to re-deploy the servers perhaps you
can think about it. Automatic setup also reduces operative tasks, reduces
human
Looks well!
Atentamente,
Sebastián Gómez
On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 9:05 AM, Boris Stoyanov <
boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> I’ve did upgrade testing from 4.9.2 on the following hypervisors:
>
> VMware 55u3 with management on CentOS7 - successful
> KVM on CentOS7 both hosts and man
I had the same problem like Marc and I could not resolve it on Ubuntu 16.04.
I followed the cloudstack steps to set it up, but the script is not running
well on our environment.
If I execute the script from command line, it works fine. During the boot
process, there is any problem on systemd and D
Absolutely, me too!
It's a good and nice work. I like it.
@eveyone: have a nice holidays!
Regards.
Atentamente,
Sebastián Gómez
On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 7:47 PM, ilya wrote:
> this is awesome - will give this a try!
>
> On 7/25/17 1:59 AM, Ivan Kudryavtsev wrote:
> > Release 1.0.6 Overview
The problem over upload from local and the problem with the console proxy
were not a problem with cloudstack, was a problem of our network
configuration.
As I told before, we have public IPs and private IPs routed into the
backbone network, so used as "public" IPs also, both mixed.
The systemvm si
First of all, what means "instance utilization is 0%", just kernel
processes and maintenance tasks can increase CPU usage during this period.
No utilization means no logins?
I don't know any service/soft that do it, but you can do it yourself:
For example:
You can easily develop a script to be ex
Hi David,
Perhaps could help you:
He have 4.5.2, and recently have migrated the storage hardware, and so we
had to migrate the primary storages to the new ones.
I had to move manually some volumes and VMs with snapshots, and I had to
update manually the cloudstack database to inform the new volum
Hi all,
We are trying to upgrade our PRE environment from 4.5.2 to 4.9.2.0 to check
the behaviour and apply on our production environment.
I have noticed two problems on the new installation, one of them is that I
can't access the VMs console via the console proxy VM (the other will
arrive on ot
/cloudstack-common/vms/systemvm.iso
Destroy the SSVM and wait for the new to be created.
SSH it and check that /var/www/html/upload dir is created.
Check also that you can upload from local.
Regards.
Atentamente,
Sebastián Gómez
On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 8:33 AM, Sebastian Gomez wrote
Hello all!
(I work with Marc)
Thanks Ilya:
About the Template upload from local-->
- I installed the lastest tomcat 6 stable release, but the problem was not
solved.
- I fixed the problem creating the /var/www/html/public dir at the SSVM and
it worked.
But this change will be lost when the SSV
If I have understood correctly:
Tag each primary storage (p.e. SSD and NLSAS), then create a different
service offering for each storage tag (when you create a Service offering -
cpu, mem, etc.- you can set the related storage tag, use SSD for one and
NLSAS for the other).
When you create the MV,
We have problems like that with cloudstack and vmware when the nic driver
was e1000 instead vmxnet3.
We changed the nic driver to vmxnet3 (on the template) and the problem was
solved (for the new virtual machines).
Regards.
Atentamente,
Sebastián Gómez
On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 10:23 AM, Ciobanu
Hello Iva, good work!
Atentamente,
Sebastián Gómez
On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 6:26 AM, Rashmi Dixit
wrote:
> Congratulations! This looks really good. Plus it's on the latest (&
> greatest) stack.
>
> Good stuff!
>
> Rashmi
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Ivan Kudryavtsev [mailto:kudryavts
... Again, my mistake, I suppose.
Any way, thank you for your support and your time.
Atentamente,
Sebastián Gómez
On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Sebastian Gomez wrote:
> Great news!
> Thanks again Paul, great job!
>
>
>
> Atentamente,
> Sebastián Gómez
>
> On
3 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
> @shapeblue
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-
> From: Sebastian Gomez [mailto:tioc...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 17 January 2017 07:56
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Support for vSphere 9
>
> Hi Paul,
&
eblue.com
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
> @shapeblue
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Sebastian Gomez [mailto:tioc...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 17 January 2017 06:48
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Support for vSphere 9
>
rify what you're trying to accomplish?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Andrew
>
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 1:15 AM, Sebastian Gomez
> wrote:
>
> > Hi all!
> >
> > I have been looking for any reference into the ACS documentation, news,
> > etc. about the support for
Hi all!
I have been looking for any reference into the ACS documentation, news,
etc. about the support for vSphere 9, but I have not found anything.
I am sure that this question has been made here before, so excuse me in
advance for ask again:
Is there any official plan for Cloudstack to suppor
Not just about any of your questions, but one advice:
If you are talking about using AWS S3 as backend storage, is highly
recommendable that you consider the storage network traffic cost. I have
faced some cases, where the prize of the network traffic of out-coming data
(from AWS to Internet) is g
We use EMC VBA wich make an incremental for-ever backup at storage level.
It has an appliance that allows to restore the full VM or file level.
We have VMware as hypervisor, I don't know if there is support for
xenserver.
El 18/4/2016 16:03, "kotipalli venkatesh"
escribió:
we are using NFS as a s
ing to solve it.. Thank a lot!
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > El vie., 29 ene. 2016 a las 9:44, Sebastian Gomez ()
> > escribió:
> >
> >> Thank you Lucian, I will try it and let you know if worked for me.
> >>
> >>
> >>
&
It worked for me!
Oh my God, I spent lot of time trying to solve it.. Thank a lot!
El vie., 29 ene. 2016 a las 9:44, Sebastian Gomez ()
escribió:
> Thank you Lucian, I will try it and let you know if worked for me.
>
>
>
> El vie., 29 ene. 2016 a las 2:25, Nux! () escri
gy!
>
> Nux!
> www.nux.ro
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Sebastian Gomez"
> > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Sent: Thursday, 28 January, 2016 12:51:08
> > Subject: cloudstack-agent 4.5 problem with cloudbr bridges
>
> > Hi all,
>
Hi all,
I have been working with cloudstack and vmware for more than 3 years, and
now I would like to test it with KVM, but I have problems with the bridges
names.
Summarizing, when I add the KVM host on cloudstack, the cloudstack agent
creates a new bridge a part of the cloudbr0 and cloudbr1 and
31 matches
Mail list logo
