Hello Mohhamad,
I think your words would be more valuable if you add some facts to
this discussions. It is really hard to understand how deep have you been
involved into different cloud platforms evaluation and what these platforms
were. It seems you haven't tried more than just "demo
People,
I want to make a new 4.4 release after not delivering the quality I
would like for 4.4.0 and 4.4.1. I want to call on all to test the head
of the 44 branch before I do. Both two prior releases have known
issues within one week after release. In my opinion it would be great
if we can preven
Cheers, will do. Till when do we have to do this?
Lucian
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
> From: "Daan Hoogland"
> To: "dev" , [email protected]
> Sent: Monday, 17 November, 2014 08:56:22
> Subject: [ACS44] release 4
Hi Dan,
would you mind provide 4.4.2 RPMs somewhere so we can test the upgrade from
4.4.1 ?
best
On 17 November 2014 09:56, Daan Hoogland wrote:
> People,
>
> I want to make a new 4.4 release after not delivering the quality I
> would like for 4.4.0 and 4.4.1. I want to call on all to test the
Andrija, you may find the latest snapshot rpms here:
http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/4.4/job/cloudstack-4.4-package-rpm/
--
Erik
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 10:13 AM, Andrija Panic
wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> would you mind provide 4.4.2 RPMs somewhere so we can test the upgrade from
> 4.4.1 ?
>
> be
Hi Justyn,
This appears similar to the following bug I raised a few weeks ago:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7775
Will it be possible for a dev to take a look at this?
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 6:36 PM, Justyn Shull wrote:
> Small update: I was able to get past this error by
Dear Team,
As of understanding this conversation for a long time, I request to stop
further communication in this thread, it would be waste of time for all of us
to engage further in this.
I see Mr.Mohhamad Mahdi Raja is neither open nor active in this thread. It
would take a year for us to ex
Thanks !
On 17 November 2014 10:20, Erik Weber wrote:
> Andrija, you may find the latest snapshot rpms here:
> http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/4.4/job/cloudstack-4.4-package-rpm/
>
> --
> Erik
>
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 10:13 AM, Andrija Panic
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Dan,
> >
> > would you mind
On Nov 15, 2014, at 8:00 PM, Mohammad Mahdi Raja wrote:
> Thanks for your answers,
>
> I installed different version on different infrastructure during the time. It
> is somehow much more unstable that other competitors. Many non-documented
> issues and many unpredictable problems. I know tha
I think, till we o longer find bugs that bug us. Not sure, but as far
as I know there is no bug in it now. I just don't want to go into a 72
hour vote period now untill I get some support for the release.
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 10:01 AM, Nux! wrote:
> Cheers, will do. Till when do we have to do
Created improvement ticket - to consider implementing Volume purging, just
like with VMs...so they are not deleted immediatey - so there is time to
recover the volume...
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7926
On 12 November 2014 14:48, Logan Barfield wrote:
> I've noticed this
One thing I agree for sure, the thread title is right, that discussion
is starting to be a waste of time :) (although very entertaining)
FG
On 2014-11-17 4:36 AM, sebgoa wrote:
On Nov 15, 2014, at 8:00 PM, Mohammad Mahdi Raja wrote:
Thanks for your answers,
I installed different version on
I agree with him, it wastes time, but at the same time you are gaining
knowledge.
If the documentation was done, he would not have faced this many problems.
Single node setup:
You never told why on restart/shutdown, you loose your secondary
storage(NFS). - May be we need to disable swap. Still I
>From my perspective there are two issues being raised in this thread.
1. The original poster didn't actually ask a question, and despite requests
for more information, nothing which would allow us to help was
forthcoming. We can't fix that which we don't know to be broken, and as
we're all learn
Hi
I also disagree completely with this thread having also checked out and
installed Cloudstack competitors I found cloudstack probably the easiest
and stablest to get running. I come from a programming not infrastructure
backdrop and as pointed out previously implementing a private cloud is not
Hi, All,
I found I could not register my ISO image to the cloudstack( through URL
of http://releases.ubuntu.com/14.04.1/ubuntu-14.04.1-server-amd64.iso). The
SSVM is running and health check show no problems on it. But it just could
not see the outside network, although SSVM is on the same networ
Gents - my point of view on the cloudstack and the work arround it is the
folowing:
- Pretty lacking documentation
- Working on new fancy features - instead of making current features work
at all...
- Few examples:
-- new vxlan isolation method was introduced some release ago - default
MTU of 14
+1 on documentation.
Previous version was simply wrong and could have never been tested.
Bug report had been open for a year at that point.
I have not tried the latest version.
Are all of the documentation bugs fixed and tested?
Ron
On 17/11/2014 3:07 PM, Andrija Panic wrote:
Gents - my point
Hi..
I was wondering if I can assign same virtual machine to multiple users so
that they can access it from there UI.
For example:-
I have a machine i-2-3-vm running centos and two users user1 and user2
Now I want that when user1 or user2 logs into cloudstack they both can see
this i-2-3-vm on the
Hi Ian,
I thought the above error was raised because of limited resources allocated
for the XenServer so I increased those by Memory 5 GB and CPUs 8. But I
still get the same error:
Following is the error I noticed in
/var/log/cloudstack/management/management-server.log file:
014-11-18 01:59:14,
Hi Ian,
I just tried to create an instance with Tiny compute offering and Tiny disk
offering and it worked. However I could not ssh into the instance. May be
ssh was not configured when I imported the Ubuntu 12.04 ISO into CloudStack.
I have few concerns, under System Capacity I can see the follo
Hi..
I am using cloudstack 4.4.1 on a single machine
As I can see in global settings there is no value assigned to
consoleproxy.url.domain. The field is empty. Do I have to assign any value
in there?
I reinstalled cloudstack from start again. Now I can access the machines
using the console button
Hi Tilak
This is exactly the use case for the Projects feature. As long as the accounts
your two users belong to are in the same domain you can create a project and
add them both to it. Any VMS created belong to the project and you can add and
remove users at will.
Regards
Geoff Higginbotto
Thanks Geoff I will surely try this feature and get back incase I face any
problems
Regards
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 12:59 PM, Geoff Higginbottom <
[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Tilak
>
> This is exactly the use case for the Projects feature. As long as the
> accounts your two us
24 matches
Mail list logo
