Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS)

2018-01-19 Thread Rohit Yadav
Hi Bobby, I checked the 4.5-4.11 upgrade environment, due to the nature of how static checker with commands.properties work, admins will be required to add/update new API/ACLs in the commands.properties file. Adding the following to commands.properties file and restarting mgmt server fixes th

Re: [DISCUSS] Freezing master for 4.11

2018-01-19 Thread Rohit Yadav
Hi Kristian, I looked at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10141 If the new VM is deployed with a password and/or ssh-key enabled VM template, then VR should get new password and the user/account specific ssh-public key so the mentioned issues don't affect such new VMs. However

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS)

2018-01-19 Thread Boris Stoyanov
Hi Rohit, That doesn’t sound much user friendly what do you think? Can we look for a way to automate this dependency in the upgrade process? Bobby. [email protected]  www.shapeblue.com 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue > On 19 Jan 2018, at 10:50,

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS)

2018-01-19 Thread Rohit Yadav
Hi Bobby, Agree, it's not user-friendly which is why admins should migrate to the dynamic roles feature. But I'm not sure if this is a blocker and if an admin wants to stick to the old static (commands.properties) way, they need to manage changes themselves. We may add something to the release

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS)

2018-01-19 Thread Boris Stoyanov
Thanks Rohit, That said I must agree it’s not a blocker but still it definitely should be part of upgrade guide. Bobby. [email protected]  www.shapeblue.com 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue On 19 Jan 2018, at 11:27, Rohit Yadav mailto:rohit.ya...@

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS)

2018-01-19 Thread Rohit Yadav
All, We don't have any outstanding blocker as of today (please report if I've missed any), for some of the issues I've request for workaround/fixes to be shared that should make into the next RC. Based on your feedback, the voting/testing, and release-related bugfixing is extended till end o

Re: kvm live volume migration

2018-01-19 Thread Rafael Weingärtner
Hey Marc, It is very interesting that you are going to pick this up for KVM. I am working in a related issue for XenServer [1]. If you can confirm that KVM is able to live migrate local volumes to other local storage or shared storage I could make the feature I am working on available to KVM as wel

Re: New L2 nework types are not shared

2018-01-19 Thread Nux!
Hi, Might be worth sending this to dev@ as well, especially now that we are doing testing for 4.11. HTH -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - > From: "Jean-Francois Nadeau" > To: "users" > Sent: Wednesday, 17 January, 2018 21:09:

RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS)

2018-01-19 Thread Paul Angus
OK, just to confirm ‘we’ the community have basically deprecated the use of commands.properties? But for people upgrading from a version before dynamic roles, does the migration script take into account (or need to take into account) the ‘missing’ quotaIsEnabled=15 parameter? paul.an...@sh

Re: kvm live volume migration

2018-01-19 Thread Eric Green
KVM is able to live migrate entire virtual machines complete with local volumes (see 'man virsh') but does require nbd (Network Block Device) to be installed on the destination host to do so. It may need installation of later libvirt / qemu packages from OpenStack repositories on Centos 6, I'm n