I wrote a repeater nested in another repeater. But
it seems not sostraightforward to write the template for them.
Every time there is error -Widget
with id "secondlayer" does not exist in the container "" , would anybody give me
some idea why???
and also, in the sample,
Hello!
I think in concerns of MVC, the solution Ralph mentioned seems to be the
best. You have a clear seperation between prsentation, controller and
business logic.
The system would look like this:
Presentation: Plain XHTML or whatever output format you like
Controller Actions
Modell:
Mike Dickson wrote:
mode name=request-param type=request/ means that there is a param
named request?
No - it means that the value should be obtained from an input module
called request-param but only if the table-set indicated to use
the modes labled request. IOW, request is just an arbitrary
I have a question about jx:forEach.
I would like to consistently use either Jexl or JXPath. In my case, I have
chosen JXPath.
I have a jx:forEach construct as follows:
jx:forEach select=#{pageComponents}
ci:include src=skins/#{skinName}/#{.}.xml/
/jx:forEach
The problem is that I am
Christian,
as long, as flowscript is ustilised to do nothing more than direct the
flow of pages, the sitemap should still retain its powerful features...
Peter
On 1 May 2004, at 11:21, Christian Rosenberger wrote:
Hello!
I think in concerns of MVC, the solution Ralph mentioned seems to be
the
I didn't mean to imply that there is no place for flowscript. There
certainly is. As I said, we are using it.
The controller in Cocoon is not the Actions; it used to be the entire
sitemap. Now it is the sitemap + flowscript. The problem is that it is easy
to have flowscript become part of the
This relates to the recent poll on Woody/CForms versions:
We are working on a Cocoon application that currently runs
under Cocoon 2.1.2.
Upgrading Cocoon is somewhat effort-expensive/risky for us,
because several other parties are using the same Cocoon test
server as we are. (Although we could
Ralph,
is there any particular reason why you don't instantiate business
objects from within flowscript, or is purely preference that you don't?
Peter
On 1 May 2004, at 15:09, Ralph Goers wrote:
I didn't mean to imply that there is no place for flowscript. There
certainly is. As I said, we are
You have to draw a line in the sand somewhere. Instantiating the objects
might not be so bad, but the next thing you know you'll be calling methods
on those business objects because its easy and then you'll really start to
pollute the controller with the model.
Ralph
-Original Message-
Il giorno 01/mag/04, alle 18:20, Ralph Goers ha scritto:
You have to draw a line in the sand somewhere. Instantiating the
objects
might not be so bad, but the next thing you know you'll be calling
methods
on those business objects because its easy and then you'll really
start to
pollute the
Doing it in the actions is where it should be done. That is the bridge
provided by the sitemap between controller and model. An action can only
provide information to the sitemap - it is not the controller.
Ralph
-Original Message-
From: Ugo Cei [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday,
Sorry if this is a FAQ, but I am in my first steps into cocoon and cforms
and all (almost) is new to me.
I have this XML data
root
hab tipo=QD quant=2/
hab tipo=QS quant=3/
precos
elem hab=QD val=30 unit=Euro/
elem hab=QS val=25 unit=Euro/
/precos
/root
That I wanto to bind with something
John L. Webber wrote:
Anna,
There's a very detailed article on the Cocoon Wiki:
http://wiki.cocoondev.org/Wiki.jsp?page=ConfiguringTheLogs
Anna Bikkina wrote:
Hi,
I want to log some details to a user defined log file(specified in
web.xml).
How can I do that from my xsp,java and xsp files
On 01.05.2004 20:45, Isidro Vila Verde wrote:
Sorry if this is a FAQ, but I am in my first steps into cocoon and cforms
and all (almost) is new to me.
No, it is not a FAQ, I read it the first time.
I have this XML data
root
hab tipo=QD quant=2/
hab tipo=QS quant=3/
precos
elem hab=QD val=30
On 01.05.2004 18:09, Lars Huttar wrote:
This relates to the recent poll on Woody/CForms versions:
We are working on a Cocoon application that currently runs
under Cocoon 2.1.2.
Upgrading Cocoon is somewhat effort-expensive/risky for us,
because several other parties are using the same Cocoon test
hi ,
you guys might also be interested to know that the
Government of the People's Republic of China is also
using Cocoon. They do have a lot of web sites
there.For instance the Ministry of Commerce
http://english.mofcom.gov.cn.
try google using this query cocoon
site:mofcom.gov.cn/
Are they really using version 1.8.3-dev ?
Andreas
- Original Message -
From: manuel moura [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, May 02, 2004 4:01 AM
Subject: using Cocoon: chinese government agencies
hi ,
you guys might also be interested to know that the
17 matches
Mail list logo
