Re: Business Logic in Cocoon Applications?

2004-05-04 Thread Derek Hohls
-Original Message- From: Derek Hohls [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: May 3, 2004 21:31 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Business Logic in Cocoon Applications? There have been a number of threads on the mailing list (April 2004) on the issue of where to locate the Business Logic; with Cocoon Flow

Vote: to unify, or not to unify (Was RE: Business Logic in Cocoon Applications?)

2004-05-04 Thread David Leangen
[I don't want to barge in on things here or step on anybody's toes. My intention is only to get some direction so I can help contribute to the Cocoon documentation. Although I am a relative newbie any my Cocoon skills are 1/1000th of the vets lingering around on this list, I think that's exactly

Vote: to unify, or not to unify (Was RE: Business Logic in Cocoon Applications?)

2004-05-04 Thread Derek Hohls
My Vote is for A; with a comment text that says: - if there are any best approaches that are case-specific these must be clearly pointed out to the users ... ... bear in mind that even though some users may be Cocoon newbies they may be experienced developers in other frameworks and want to know

Re: Vote: to unify, or not to unify (Was RE: Business Logic in Cocoon Applications?)

2004-05-04 Thread Ugo Cei
David Leangen wrote: [ ] A. I think that we should show users the best way to get up and running with Cocoon. [X ] B. I think that we should show users all the options possible and let them decide the best approach. [ ] C. Yeah, whatever. Either way is good for me.

Re: Vote: to unify, or not to unify (Was RE: Business Logic in Cocoon Applications?)

2004-05-04 Thread gounis
However, we still need to reach consensus on what such a unified approach(es) should be. I would like to take a poll (probably the first of many): *** [ ] A. I think that we should show users the best way to get

Re: Vote: to unify, or not to unify (Was RE: Business Logic in Cocoon Applications?)

2004-05-04 Thread Tim Larson
David Leangen wrote: [X ] A. I think that we should show users the best way to get up and running with Cocoon. [X ] B. I think that we should show users all the options possible and let them decide the best approach. [ ] C. Yeah, whatever. Either way is good for me.

Re: Vote: to unify, or not to unify (Was RE: Business Logic in Cocoon Applications?)

2004-05-04 Thread Nacho Jimenez
Tim Larson wrote: David Leangen wrote: [X ] A. I think that we should show users the best way to get up and running with Cocoon. [X ] B. I think that we should show users all the options possible and let them decide the best approach. [ ] C. Yeah, whatever. Either way is good

RE: Vote: to unify, or not to unify (Was RE: Business Logic in Cocoon Applications?)

2004-05-04 Thread Joel McConaughy
[XX] A. I think that we should show users the best way to get up and running with Cocoon. [ ] B. I think that we should show users all the options possible and let them decide the best approach. [ ] C. Yeah, whatever. Either way is good for me. Peace, man!

Business Logic in Cocoon Applications?

2004-05-03 Thread Derek Hohls
There have been a number of threads on the mailing list (April 2004) on the issue of where to locate the Business Logic; with Cocoon Flow, for example, coming under criticism (and defence) for its potential to act (correctly or incorrectly?!) in this respect. It would be very helpful to set up a

RE: Business Logic in Cocoon Applications?

2004-05-03 Thread David Leangen
. :-) Dave -Original Message- From: Derek Hohls [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: May 3, 2004 21:31 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Business Logic in Cocoon Applications? There have been a number of threads on the mailing list (April 2004) on the issue of where to locate

Re: Business Logic in Cocoon Applications?

2004-05-03 Thread Nacho Jimenez
in a Wiki with pleasure. :-) Dave -Original Message- From: Derek Hohls [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: May 3, 2004 21:31 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Business Logic in Cocoon Applications? There have been a number of threads on the mailing list (April 2004) on the issue of where