Re: Jetty included w/ Cocoon

2003-12-23 Thread Litrik De Roy
is there any reason why I should not use the Jetty included w/ Cocoon in a production setting? At the office, we have been using the Jetty included in Cocoon for quite some time now as our production server. It is not exactly a high-volume site, but Jetty handles the load perfectly. It is very stable

Re: Jetty included w/ Cocoon

2003-12-23 Thread Tony Collen
. Someone must know is there any reason why I should not use the Jetty included w/ Cocoon in a production setting? At the office, we have been using the Jetty included in Cocoon for quite some time now as our production server. It is not exactly a high-volume site, but Jetty handles the load

Re: Jetty included w/ Cocoon

2003-12-23 Thread beyaRecords - The home Urban music
me the impression that this Jetty is somehow stripped down, or otherwise not production-ready. Someone must know is there any reason why I should not use the Jetty included w/ Cocoon in a production setting? At the office, we have been using the Jetty included in Cocoon for quite some time

Re: Jetty included w/ Cocoon

2003-12-23 Thread Upayavira
-ready. Someone must know is there any reason why I should not use the Jetty included w/ Cocoon in a production setting? At the office, we have been using the Jetty included in Cocoon for quite some time now as our production server. It is not exactly a high-volume site, but Jetty handles

Re: Jetty included w/ Cocoon

2003-12-23 Thread Litrik De Roy
Upayavira wrote: beyaRecords - The home Urban music wrote: So chaps, is jetty a better proposition than tomcat? In my installation, Tomcat failed regularly (every day or two). Jetty fails only when the processor can't cope (bad design of my Cocoon app). We have seen similar behavior when using

Re: Jetty included w/ Cocoon

2003-12-23 Thread beyaRecords - The home Urban music
cheers, i will now investigate jetty and see what it is like. i have tomcat setup with apache so that tomcat can be accessed minus :8080 so 12.0.0.1/examples leads me to the tomcat stuff my apache workes2.properties file reads as: [uri:127.0.0.1:8003] info=Example virtual host. Make sure

Re: Jetty included w/ Cocoon

2003-12-23 Thread Upayavira
Don't understand what technique you're using to connect Apache/Tomcat. Are you using AJP13? If so, you can just shut down Tomcat and start up Jetty (making sure it's listening for AJP). Regards, Upayavira beyaRecords - The home Urban music wrote: cheers, i will now investigate jetty and see

Re: Jetty included w/ Cocoon

2003-12-23 Thread beyaRecords - The home Urban music
yep, I am using ajp13. i presume cocoon folder and cocoon.war would sit in the root of jetty as per tomcat? Uzo On 23 Dec 2003, at 21:14, Upayavira wrote: Don't understand what technique you're using to connect Apache/Tomcat. Are you using AJP13? If so, you can just shut down Tomcat and start

Jetty included w/ Cocoon

2003-12-22 Thread Mark Lundquist
should not use the Jetty included w/ Cocoon in a production setting? Thanks a lot, Mark Lundquist - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Jetty included w/ Cocoon

2003-12-22 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
Le Mardi, 23 déc 2003, à 00:41 Europe/Zurich, Mark Lundquist a écrit : Right now, for development, I'm running Cocoon 2.1.2 inside the Jetty that comes included w/ the Cocoon distro. Somewhere, I read something that gave me the impression that this Jetty is somehow stripped down, or