On Mon, 14 Jun 2004 15:05:20 -0400
"Murphy, Thomas H. (Newport News)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Partly because Cocoon comes with just about everything
> except the kitchen sink (scheduled for Cocoon 2.2?), I'm
> interested in exploring Cocoon as a standalone,
> command-line application, *separa
Murphy, Thomas H. (Newport News) wrote:
Partly because Cocoon comes with just about everything except the kitchen
sink (scheduled for Cocoon 2.2?), I'm interested in exploring Cocoon as a
standalone, command-line application, *separate* from any use of Cocoon as a
webapp.
I realize that Cocoon can
Thanks Upayavira and Simon for writing.
I don't want to take up too much of people's time on this because I imagine
I'm in a very small minority in wanting a command-line-only build option.
Just as Cocoon can work as the center for all kinds of different web apps
and transformations, it could als
Just as Cocoon can work as the center for all kinds of different web apps
and transformations, it could also, I think, work as a transformation hub
for non-web apps. Sure, one could use Xerces/Xalan separately, and FOP
That is my vision as well, and it is how i am (ab)using cocoon at the
moment,
bleh
forget that RMI based cocoon server. The document is about writing an
RMI generator (as the title helpfully says)
But still: would it be difficult at all to write an RMI server that
takes cocoon-style requests and return cocoon-style responses? Could
this be done via the cocoon bean or the
On Tue, 15 Jun 2004 09:50:31 -0400
"Murphy, Thomas H. (Newport News)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Thanks Upayavira and Simon for writing.
>
> I don't want to take up too much of people's time on this
> because I imagine I'm in a very small minority in wanting
> a command-line-only build option.
Thank you Simon and Jorg for your explanations.
I take it that, for now, the build structure of Cocoon is inextricably
linked to its intended use as a web application. I'll redirect my
explorations into the areas you've suggested. (Plus spend some quality time
at the wiki . . . .)
Thanks again,
