Sebastian wrote:
Since this error is on the aggregate-widget and that one is not actually
on the template, there is no position where the (!) should be next to.
Therefor you need to explitely position it with a separate
see also here:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-dev&m=10817664
Since this error is on the aggregate-widget and that one is not actually
on the template, there is no position where the (!) should be next to.
Therefor you need to explitely position it with a separate
see also here:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-dev&m=108176649831199&w=2
and he
Sebastian wrote:
Dnia Mon, 19 Apr 2004 22:41:50 +0200, Marc Portier
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napisał:
^^^ did I? gosh :-$
Ok. I've looked at C2.1.5. Lot of new stuff. It looks interesting.
Saddly I'm not web developer anymore and don't have so much time
to spend on it
Dnia Mon, 19 Apr 2004 22:41:50 +0200, Marc Portier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
napisał:
see the aggregate-sample with the 'switch' button
(of course that is a somewhat giving you the idea that you _should_ have
multiple templates for one form, but you should at least notice that
both templates mention
Sebastian wrote:
Dnia Mon, 19 Apr 2004 15:18:38 +0200, Marc Portier
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napisał:
thx for spotting, since it is a wiki you should be encouraged to just fix
I did so.
thx.
- multiform is in my head about controlling the flow between forms. As
such the correct separation is: le
Dnia Mon, 19 Apr 2004 15:18:38 +0200, Marc Portier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
napisał:
thx for spotting, since it is a wiki you should be encouraged to just fix
I did so.
- multiform is in my head about controlling the flow between forms. As
such the correct separation is: let cforms describe one form,
Sebastian wrote:
Thanks all for your reply and sorry for the mess I did :)
Marc Portier napisał(a):
[executive summary]
- aggregate works both ways, it is about the form-model, not about
binding nor templating
I though so at the begining, because it seams to be natural for me.
I just encoun
I cannot agree. Sometimes I need to allow user on first page to choose
which page will be next. For example, on first page user can check some
checkboxes and regarding to user choice I would like to show forms
which are availiable for choosed by user options. I don't want him to
waste a time for f
Thanks all for your reply and sorry for the mess I did :)
Marc Portier napisał(a):
> [executive summary]
> - aggregate works both ways, it is about the form-model, not about
> binding nor templating
I though so at the begining, because it seams to be natural for me.
I just encountered a problem
Sebastian,
[executive summary]
- aggregate works both ways, it is about the form-model, not about
binding nor templating
- multiform is in my head about controlling the flow between forms. As
such the correct separation is: let cforms describe one form, let flow
control the decission to go fro
Sebastian dijo:
> Hi there,
>
> I've following problem. I'm using woody with binding to hibernate.
> In my database I've field called NIP (it is polish rate payer
> identification number). It has 4 parts separated by '-'. I've written
> successfuly validation class for this number and everything wo
On 18.04.2004 21:24, Sebastian wrote:
Hi there,
I've following problem. I'm using woody with binding to hibernate.
In my database I've field called NIP (it is polish rate payer
identification number). It has 4 parts separated by '-'. I've written
successfuly validation class for this number and ev
I don't know whether you use flowscript or xsp.
If you use flowscript, you could look at the custom validation demo.
That way you can
validate the data on the form using any logic (javascript) you wish.
If you use xsp you could use, before the map:act type=process an entry like
map:transform sr
Dnia Sun, 18 Apr 2004 21:47:03 +0200, Leon Widdershoven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
napisał:
can't you put a Transformer with an appropriate xsl stylesheet (which
combines the
entries) just after the receiving match in the sitemap?
Leon
Explain our your idea? What is the magic way to store walue in NIP
can't you put a Transformer with an appropriate xsl stylesheet (which
combines the
entries) just after the receiving match in the sitemap?
Leon
Sebastian wrote:
Hi there,
I've following problem. I'm using woody with binding to hibernate.
In my database I've field called NIP (it is polish rate
Hi there,
I've following problem. I'm using woody with binding to hibernate.
In my database I've field called NIP (it is polish rate payer
identification number). It has 4 parts separated by '-'. I've written
successfuly validation class for this number and everything works
fine. Now I would like
16 matches
Mail list logo
