Hello,
with cocoon 2.1M1 i used the entry "request:request/@target" to check the
location in my xsl. With the new namespace in cocoon 2.1 i get no result.
When calling the request generator i got in c2.1M1 this result:
http://xml.apache.org/cocoon/requestgenerator/2.0";
target="/cocoon/OCIpreloa
Hello Roman,
the namespace uri has changed from
http://xml.apache.org/cocoon/requestgenerator/2.0 to
http://apache.org/cocoon/request/2.0 because of the move of Cocoon to an
Apache top project. The namespace prefix has no influence on the orking
of the stylesheet, you only must bind your reque
nt: Montag, 22. September 2003 20:23
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: new request namespace?
Hello Roman,
the namespace uri has changed from
http://xml.apache.org/cocoon/requestgenerator/2.0 to
http://apache.org/cocoon/request/2.0 because of the move of Cocoon to an
Apache top project. Th
Hmm, strange. As I sad, the namespace prefix makes no difference.
Important is the binding of the namespace uri to an arbitrary namespace
prefix in the stylesheet. This must also be done if the original XML
uses the default namespace (as you mentioned it was done this way: the
XML had no prefix
This stylesheet works for me:
http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform";
xmlns:request="http://apache.org/cocoon/request/2.0";>
Joerg
Joerg Heinicke wrote:
Hmm, strange. As I sad, the namespace prefix makes no difference.
Important is the binding of the namespace uri t
Hello Joerg,
it is right - your stylesheet works well.
I forgot to mention, that i have another root element "object".
My generated xml looks like:
http://apache.org/cocoon/include/1.0";
xmlns:session="http://apache.org/cocoon/session/1.0";
xmlns:request="http://apache.org/cocoon/request/2.0";>
h
Fleischer Roman wrote:
Hello Joerg,
it is right - your stylesheet works well.
I forgot to mention, that i have another root element "object".
My generated xml looks like:
http://apache.org/cocoon/include/1.0";
xmlns:session="http://apache.org/cocoon/session/1.0";
xmlns:request="http://apache.org/
: Mittwoch, 24. September 2003 15:25
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: new request namespace?
Fleischer Roman wrote:
> Hello Joerg,
>
> it is right - your stylesheet works well.
> I forgot to mention, that i have another root element "object".
> My generated xml looks
