:> Yeah, I'm in full agreement with you.
:>
:> I think I was a bit misanderstood: Hammer performance is *much better* than
:> rsnapshot (obviously) but there is no way to easily tell it to keep its
:> snapshot distribution in different intervals for archiving purposes.
:> This is the one thing rsna
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 4:10 PM, Francois Tigeot wrote:
>
> Yeah, I'm in full agreement with you.
>
> I think I was a bit misanderstood: Hammer performance is *much better* than
> rsnapshot (obviously) but there is no way to easily tell it to keep its
> snapshot distribution in different intervals
Hi George,
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 03:40:08PM +0530, Siju George wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 1:15 PM, Francois Tigeot
> wrote:
> > I think sysutils/rsnapshot does what you want. It uses hard links to
> > simulate snapshots on classic filesystems and manages different ranges
> > of snapshots.
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 7:26 AM, Matthew Dillon
wrote:
>
> hammer cleanup only removes snapshots over X days old. It can't
> distinguish between fine-grained and coarse-grained snapshots
> that you explicitly tell hammer to make. You would have to remove
> those yourself (if you want
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 1:15 PM, Francois Tigeot
wrote:
> I think sysutils/rsnapshot does what you want. It uses hard links to
simulate
> snapshots on classic filesystems and manages different ranges of
snapshots.
>
> You can specify how much snapshots you want to keep for each range:
>
> [rsnaps
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 06:56:50PM -0700, Matthew Dillon wrote:
>
> :All I need is to figure out how to remove the 5mins snapshots that
> :gets mirrored on the slave older than two days with out removing the
> :daily snapshots.
> :
> :But I am a bit confused now since I dont see snapshots actually
:All I need is to figure out how to remove the 5mins snapshots that
:gets mirrored on the slave older than two days with out removing the
:daily snapshots.
:
:But I am a bit confused now since I dont see snapshots actually
:removed after a hammer cleanup.
:I will send the details with a new subjec
On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 11:16 PM, Matthew Dillon
wrote:
> So, here's an example. Lets say you have:
>
> /samba_export Your samba export hierarchy
> /hammer Your hammer filesystem
> /hammer/pfs/blah Some PFS in the hammer filesystem
>
> A
I've been thinking about the issue of mounting snapshots and I
have an idea.
In order for a slave snapshot link to work it must reference the
@@: portion of the softlink relative to the
base HAMMER filesystem the PFS was created in.
You can do this by creating a dummy sub
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 2:22 AM, Matthew Dillon
wrote:
>
> :For a MS Windows user it will look like the actual pic below.
> :
> :http://picasaweb.google.com/sgeorge.ml/OpenBSDDesktop#5462824618389365522
> :
> :Clicking on the snapshot Directory they can get the snapshot contents :-)
>
> I am to
10 matches
Mail list logo
