On Aug 14, 2014, at 4:58 PM, Dennis Sosnoski wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> I think I see what's going on here. Your AuthenticationDiacapEndpoint_policy
> which specifies the use of RM and AsymmetricBinding doesn't set anything to
> be signed, instead leaving that to the individual input and output po
Hi Paul,
I think I see what's going on here. Your
AuthenticationDiacapEndpoint_policy which specifies the use of RM and
AsymmetricBinding doesn't set anything to be signed, instead leaving
that to the individual input and output policies (such as
AuthenticationDiacapEndpoint_Activate_Input_po
On 8/13/14 4:32 PM, "Daniel Kulp" wrote:
>The policy has aassertion in it so I would
>have expected the signatures to be encrypted. The CXF request has two
>ncryptedData elements which MAY correspond to the two Signatures that
>the .NET client is sending. No really sure though as I don¹t k
Sure, sounds like a good idea, thanks
Sergey
On 14/08/14 13:37, Daniel Kulp wrote:
Could we change the flag to:
-inheritResourceParams[=first|last]
where it would default to first on 3.x and last on 2.7.x, but the user could
explicitly set it depending on their needs/compatibility requirements
I've got a confirmation CXF does it the same way as Jersey so I think
CXF is compliant.
Thanks, Sergey
On 14/08/14 09:49, Sergey Beryozkin wrote:
Hi
On 14/08/14 08:42, Vassilis Virvilis wrote:
On 08/14/2014 09:34 AM, Vassilis Virvilis wrote:
Hi,
Hope this clears it up. I will take now a rea
Maybe this is a difficult question to answer.
An HTTP 202 response will be returned for a request that has been
determined as a oneway service call. If something goes wrong before
that happens, there will be some HTTP 4xx/5xx error. The semantics of
HTTP 202 may differ depending on what your code
Hi,
I just found on RestyGWT sources and verified with tests that handles
correctly the @QueryParam case but not the @FormParam case. So I believe
this concludes it unless the standard handles differently @QueryParam
from @FormParam.
I will try to raise the issue with RestyGWT
(https://gith
Aki Yoshida-3 wrote
> 2014-08-05 14:35 GMT+02:00 Timo Hosters <
> thosters@
> >:
>> Aki Yoshida-3 wrote
>>> ... and got a fix in their microwave.
>>
>> I'm not a native speaker, thus unsure if that is colloquialism, sarcasm
>> or
>> some sort of saying? It could mean "fixing could be quick if som
On 14/08/14 10:17, franck wrote:
Sergey Beryozkin
You said :
Sergey Beryozkin wrote
apparently it is a default in some cases but proper JSON libraries
should allow for configuring it. I'll deal with it in the next Jettison
release, I'll keep you up-to-date.
Please check if Jackson can do it in
Could we change the flag to:
-inheritResourceParams[=first|last]
where it would default to first on 3.x and last on 2.7.x, but the user could
explicitly set it depending on their needs/compatibility requirements?
Dan
On Aug 14, 2014, at 7:01 AM, Sergey Beryozkin wrote:
> Hi
>
> CXF WADL t
On 08/14/2014 11:37 AM, Sergey Beryozkin wrote:
No problems at all, thanks for the clarifications. It's a bit of a grey
area, and I actually sent a message to the JAX-RS group to clarify. You
may well be right in the end :-). It's just a bit of a sensitive area, a
non-compliance will be addresse
Hi,
On 08/14/2014 11:49 AM, Sergey Beryozkin wrote:
Hi
On 14/08/14 08:42, Vassilis Virvilis wrote:
On 08/14/2014 09:34 AM, Vassilis Virvilis wrote:
Hi,
Hope this clears it up. I will take now a read on the spec and I will
follow up if I spot anything.
I opened up an issue with Resty-GWT
Sergey Beryozkin
You said :
Sergey Beryozkin wrote
> apparently it is a default in some cases but proper JSON libraries
> should allow for configuring it. I'll deal with it in the next Jettison
> release, I'll keep you up-to-date.
>
> Please check if Jackson can do it in meantime
>
> Sergey
I
Hi,
I had a general question about web services. Sorry, it is not related to
CXF, but this is a so good community, maybe someone can help me:).
In case of an async web service call the receiver acknowledges the request
with an HTTP 202 usually. What is the semantics of this acknowledge:
1) We re
Hi
CXF WADL to Java generator supports an option for the parent resource
parameters be added into the current method signature, it is called
"inheritResourceParams". It can help with minimizing the duplication
across the whole WADL document.
Alexey Markevich opened an enhancement request [1]
Can somebody please give me some pointers about logging the XmlStreamWriter
with the Stax WWS4j (see details below).
Thanks, Ed
> -Original Message-
> From: Ed Bras [mailto:z...@debrasjes.com]
> Sent: maandag 11 augustus 2014 21:32
> To: users@cxf.apache.org
> Subject: Issues upgrading to
Hi
On 14/08/14 08:42, Vassilis Virvilis wrote:
On 08/14/2014 09:34 AM, Vassilis Virvilis wrote:
Hi,
Hope this clears it up. I will take now a read on the spec and I will
follow up if I spot anything.
I opened up an issue with Resty-GWT at
https://github.com/resty-gwt/resty-gwt/issues/195
I
Hi Vassilis
On 14/08/14 07:34, Vassilis Virvilis wrote:
Hi,
On 08/13/2014 06:43 PM, Sergey Beryozkin wrote:
On 13/08/14 15:43, Vassilis Virvilis wrote:
This however transmits the entities as one jsonified array with [{x:"a",
y:"b"}, {x:"c", y:"d"}] if you know what I mean. CXF in the other
doe
hello,
I have got problem with wsdl2java and not sure what is wrong.
If there is imports with schemaLocation as URL as following, then cxf
generates two packages with same classes - one with normal name from
namespace and with package name "generated". And then I get compilation
error because of
On 08/14/2014 09:34 AM, Vassilis Virvilis wrote:
Hi,
Hope this clears it up. I will take now a read on the spec and I will
follow up if I spot anything.
I opened up an issue with Resty-GWT at
https://github.com/resty-gwt/resty-gwt/issues/195
I am not an expert but looks like that CXF is pe
20 matches
Mail list logo
