laf
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-Some-general-questions-tp11765.html
Sent from the Apache Flex Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On 1/17/16, 11:49 AM, "OK" wrote:
>Hi,
>I've started playing around with FlexJS and have some (perhaps stupid)
>questions:
>
>1) Can be pure ActionScript "non UI .swc libraries", that are already used
>with the standard SDK, still used with FlexJS? (I've made some tests with
>PureMVC and it see
use what we call "externs
swcs": a swc of empty API definitions.
I don't understand this, what do you mean with "...skip using the SWF"?
Thanks for help Alex!
Olaf
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-users.246.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-Some-general-
On 1/18/16, 12:03 AM, "OK" wrote:
>>Any library without dependencies on Flash has a chance of working when
>>cross-compiled.
>
>Does it make a difference if the swc is compiled by using the standard
>Compiler or by the FlexJS Compiler?
I guess it depends on what your goals are. FlexJS should
at
org.apache.flex.compiler.clients.MXMLJSC.staticMainNoExit(MXMLJSC.java:235)
at org.apache.flex.compiler.clients.MXMLJSC.main(MXMLJSC.java:178)
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-users.246.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-Some-general-questions-tp11765p11771.html
Sent from the Apache Flex Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On 1/18/16, 8:40 AM, "OK" wrote:
>>But if you want to see the SWCs functionality work without Flash, you
>>actually need to cross-compile the source code for the SWC with the
>>FlexJS/FalconJX compiler.
>
>By doing this with the PureMVC lib I've got a "File not found" error while
>cross compili
be easier if FlexJS provides minimum one fast and modern UI component
set. Yes I know FlexJS depends on Volunteers... ;-)
Thanks,
Olaf
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-Some-general-questions-tp11765p11783.html
Sent from the Apache Flex Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
