Stop banging on about Linux, it's rubbish :-)
-Original Message-
From: Timothy Jones [mailto:timothy.jo...@syniverse.com]
Sent: 15 May 2013 19:18
To: users@flex.apache.org
Subject: RE: future of flash (yes, that old chestnut again)
It makes perfect sense: otherwise you end up dependent
On 15/05/2013 19:17, Timothy Jones wrote:
marketshare in the same way you measure Mac and Windows. If Flash Player had
been open, plenty of folks would have gladly contributed code (time and effort)
to make it work better, at little or no cost to Adobe.
And those of use who *did* try to
Thanks Alex.
I appreciate your comments - with the 5 year commitment from Adobe, and
FlexJS on the horizon, i can relax (a bit).
I just worry about your employers sometimes. At Max 2011, the message
was use HTML5 for RIAs, and shortly afterwards mobile Flash Player was
dropped. At Max 2013,
) as the next great frontier
is, at best, disingenuous. These are my opinions...your mileage may vary.
M. McConnell
From: Lee Burrows subscripti...@leeburrows.com
To: users@flex.apache.org
Date: 05/15/2013 06:15 AM
Subject:Re: future of flash (yes, that old chestnut again
subscripti...@leeburrows.com
To: users@flex.apache.org
Date:05/15/2013 06:15 AM
Subject: Re: future of flash (yes, that old chestnut again)
Thanks Alex.
I appreciate your comments - with the 5 year commitment from Adobe, and
FlexJS on the horizon, i can relax (a bit).
I just
: future of flash (yes, that old chestnut again)
Thanks Alex.
I appreciate your comments - with the 5 year commitment from Adobe, and
FlexJS on the horizon, i can relax (a bit).
I just worry about your employers sometimes. At Max 2011, the message
was use HTML5 for RIAs, and shortly afterwards
-Original Message-
From: Claude Bernardini [mailto:cbernard...@ultima-com.net]
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2013 7:33 AM
To: users@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: future of flash (yes, that old chestnut again)
Hi,
I totally agree with Mike.
HTML 5 is a poor alternative.
Anyway, if we must deliver
]
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2013 9:11 AM
To: users@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: future of flash (yes, that old chestnut again)
I worry less about the message than I do the motivation behind the push
towards HTML5. It still makes no sense to me from a developer's
perspective, though I've tried
...@lamd.uscourts.gov]
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2013 1:55 PM
To: users@flex.apache.org
Subject: RE: future of flash (yes, that old chestnut again)
@Timothy
'Standards-based is criteria #0 of the open internet. No matter how slick,
non-standards-based technologies are not open, and __that_alone__ makes
On 5/15/2013 2:17 PM, Timothy Jones wrote:
It makes perfect sense: otherwise you end up dependent on one vendor for stuff
that works.
Is that not the case with web development today? Browsers are
horribly inconsistent; and frameworks such as JQuery spent countless
hours making sure the
-Original Message-
From: mike_l_mcconn...@lamd.uscourts.gov
[mailto:mike_l_mcconn...@lamd.uscourts.gov]
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2013 9:11 AM
To: users@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: future of flash (yes, that old chestnut again)
I worry less about the message than I do the motivation behind
[mailto:mike_l_mcconn...@lamd.uscourts.gov]
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2013 9:11 AM
To: users@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: future of flash (yes, that old chestnut again)
I worry less about the message than I do the motivation behind the push
towards HTML5. It still makes no sense to me from
: Wednesday, May 15, 2013 9:11 AM
To: users@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: future of flash (yes, that old chestnut again)
I worry less about the message than I do the motivation behind the push
towards HTML5. It still makes no sense to me from a developer's
perspective, though I've tried
That is my recollection as well. We are about 16 months into that by now.
I can't believe Flash Player will suddenly drop off the face of the planet,
though. Something will replace it or it will simply continue on as it does
today.
M. McConnell
From: Lee Burrows
Flash Player will be around at least as long as IE6 was. (duck!)
tlj
-Original Message-
From: mike_l_mcconn...@lamd.uscourts.gov
[mailto:mike_l_mcconn...@lamd.uscourts.gov]
Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2013 2:25 PM
To: users@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: future of flash (yes, that old
The relevant documents are:
[1] http://www.adobe.com/devnet/flashplatform/whitepapers/roadmap.html
[2] http://www.adobe.com/devnet/flex/whitepapers/roadmap.html
It is [2] that mentions five years.
But realize that, to the best of my knowledge, there is no code that will
cause Flash to stop
Hi Alex,
-- Music to my ears!
Sent from my iPad
On 2013-05-14, at 15:29, Alex Harui aha...@adobe.com wrote:
The relevant documents are:
[1] http://www.adobe.com/devnet/flashplatform/whitepapers/roadmap.html
[2] http://www.adobe.com/devnet/flex/whitepapers/roadmap.html
It is [2] that
Hi Alex,
Below highlighted words produced excitement into me. Is there any
location where I can find the draft or roadmap or anything like that for
this new feature.
Thanks,
Vikram Shityalkar
Raykor http://www.raykor.com || Take look at inEdit
http://www.ineditdemo.com:8080
On
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/Alex%27s+FlexJS+Prototype
On 5/14/13 9:40 PM, Vikram Shityalkar vik...@raykor.com wrote:
Hi Alex,
Below highlighted words produced excitement into me. Is there any
location where I can find the draft or roadmap or anything like that for
19 matches
Mail list logo
