Hi Noel
So are you trigering these events and running the macros to populate a form
from two separate tables?
Alex
On Sunday 06 Apr 2014 00:13:31 Marion & Noel Lodge wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sorry I've been slow to respond to all your posts. It has taken me a while
> to sort out what I think is happ
On Sat, 5 Apr 2014 14:20:24 -0700 (PDT)
CVAlkan wrote:
> Thanks for all the comments -
>
> By the way, are you the same Jim Seymour who used to have a column
> in PC-Mag (I think that was it - along with Dvorak and others)?
Somebody *just* asked me that question, here, a couple weeks ago.
No.
I have to correct myself...
On Sat, 5 Apr 2014 17:14:12 -0400
Jim Seymour wrote:
[snip]
> No, they didn't. Early Apple PCs ran the MOS Technologies (later:
> Mostek) 6502. CP/M never ran on anything but the Intel 8080 and
> Zilog Z80. (And only on the latter because it was a superset of the
>
On Sat, 05 Apr 2014 23:04:42 +0200
Jean-Louis Oneto wrote:
> The
> DRI CP/M80 then CP/M86 were nothing but vaporware,
I think you must have CP/M and CP/M-86 conflated with something
else. CP/M-80 was anything *but* "vapourware." In the mid-70's to
early 80's, 8080- and Z-80 systems ran on not
Thanks for all the comments -
By the way, are you the same Jim Seymour who used to have a column in PC-Mag
(I think that was it - along with Dvorak and others)?
Frank
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Microsoft-Revisits-the-80s-With-MS-DOS-Word-for-Windows-
On Sat, 05 Apr 2014 16:43:46 -0400
Kracked_P_P---webmaster wrote:
[snip]
> I hated CP/M
[snip]
It was nearly indistinguishable from DOS, or DOS was nearly
indistinguishable from it, depending upon ones perspective.
> The other rooms had old Apple [before Macs] and they had
> CP/M OS options, .
The first floppies where 8", single sided, single density and were lade for
punch card substitute: the 80kB capacity was then equivalent to a rack of 1000
80 columns punched cards. That was in the early 1970's. Before that, there was
14" amovible HDD, with a capacity of 2.5 MB, made by several m
On 04/05/2014 03:05 PM, Jim Seymour wrote:
On Sat, 05 Apr 2014 13:57:48 -0400
James Knott wrote:
Kracked_P_P---webmaster wrote:
On 04/04/2014 05:56 PM, CVAlkan wrote:
Not sure if my recollections are correct, but I don't believe
either DOS (before 2.x) or the DOS version of Word were written
At 04:00 06/04/2014 +1000, Philip Rhoades wrote:
I want to create a chart from a table that has just a low and a high
value for each category - so each end of the bar, for each category,
corresponds to the low or the high value for that category - this
does not look possible as far as I can see
On Sat, 05 Apr 2014 13:57:48 -0400
James Knott wrote:
> Kracked_P_P---webmaster wrote:
> > On 04/04/2014 05:56 PM, CVAlkan wrote:
> >> Not sure if my recollections are correct, but I don't believe
> >> either DOS (before 2.x) or the DOS version of Word were written
> >> by Microsoft. I seem to
>
People,
I want to create a chart from a table that has just a low and a high
value for each category - so each end of the bar, for each category,
corresponds to the low or the high value for that category - this does
not look possible as far as I can see?
Thanks,
Phil.
--
Philip Rhoades
GP
Kracked_P_P---webmaster wrote:
> On 04/04/2014 05:56 PM, CVAlkan wrote:
>> Not sure if my recollections are correct, but I don't believe either DOS
>> (before 2.x) or the DOS version of Word were written by Microsoft. I
>> seem to
>> recall that both were purchased and re-branded.
DOS was bought f
Dunno if you're talking to me or to the OP, anyway, here goes :)
Le 04/04/2014 18:01, CVAlkan a écrit :
> Just a thought:
>
> In the Tools|Options dialog, there is a section under LibreOffice|General
> titled "Document Status."
>
> Under that is a check box labelled: "Allow to save document even
On 04/04/2014 05:56 PM, CVAlkan wrote:
Not sure if my recollections are correct, but I don't believe either DOS
(before 2.x) or the DOS version of Word were written by Microsoft. I seem to
recall that both were purchased and re-branded.
Word for MS-DOS was typical of the approach Microsoft would
On 04/05/2014 09:13 AM, Marion & Noel Lodge wrote:
Hi,
Sorry I've been slow to respond to all your posts. It has taken me a while
to sort out what I think is happening.
Many of us are very busy and totally understand when it takes time to
respond!
Fernand, thanks for your code suggestion
Hi,
Sorry I've been slow to respond to all your posts. It has taken me a while
to sort out what I think is happening.
Fernand, thanks for your code suggestion. I pasted it into the start of my
macros and the Wait() statement worked perfectly. Then I incorporated it
into my Init macro and disco
Hi :)
Try Gnumeric;
http://www.gnumeric.org/download.html
It's a dedicated spreadsheet program with a tiny footprint that uses
minimal resources, so it's faster, lighter and more robust than Excel
or Calc. Many people find Gnumeric to be better than Calc or Excel
for serious or hefty spreadsheets
17 matches
Mail list logo
