Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: LO 4 documentation

On Mon, 11 Feb 2013 11:58:45 -0500, Marc Paré wrote Re [libreoffice-users] Re: LO 4 documentation: >Hi Caesar > >Le 2013-02-11 06:54, Tom Davies a écrit : >> Hi :) >> You can get completed chapters in advance from >> https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Documentation/Pu

[libreoffice-users] LO 4 documentation

Does anyone know when the documentation at is scheduled to be updated to v4.x? The LO v4.x templates creation and handling seems to have changed quite a bit from v3.x. Note: I am using the Windows portable version of LO 4 so the I don't have

[libreoffice-users] LO 4 portable problem starting

For those who have installed LibreOffice v4 portable and find that when trying to start it, nothing at all happens; the problem is very likely missing .dll files for the Microsoft Visual C++ 2010 such as MSVCP100.dll and MSVCR100.dll To c

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Cannot Install LO 3.6.5

On Fri, 8 Feb 2013 13:33:32 -0800 (PST), alnuwer wrote Re [libreoffice-users] Re: Cannot Install LO 3.6.5: >Caesar, Thanks for the suggestion. In the meantime, I downloaded 4.0.0, >and it installed flawlessly. So guess my installer is ok. Glad to see that you got it solved. -

Re: [libreoffice-users] Cannot Install LO 3.6.5

On Fri, 8 Feb 2013 10:22:59 -0800 (PST), alnuwer wrote Re [libreoffice-users] Cannot Install LO 3.6.5: >Trying to update to LibreOffice 3.6.5 on my XPpro. After install completes >and I try to open it, I get a Fatal Error message that says something about >Service Manager is not available - Inval

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Re: LibreOffice 4.0

On Tue, 05 Feb 2013 09:57:05 -0500, webmaster-Kracked_P_P wrote Re Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Re: LibreOffice 4.0: >EVERY time >they release a new version, since 2007, they require the user to buy the >new version to be compatible. They there is the big hike in buying >their office suite, si

Re: [libreoffice-users] Recent Documents list

On Tue, 15 Jan 2013 17:33:49 -0500, Dan Lewis wrote Re Re: [libreoffice-users] Recent Documents list: >On 01/14/2013 04:36 PM, Caesar wrote: >> Hello all, >> >> Re: LO 3.6.4 on Windows XP >> >> In both Writer and Calc if one clicks on >>File - Recent

Re: [libreoffice-users] Recent Documents list

On Tue, 15 Jan 2013 23:49:22 +0100, Miros?aw Zalewski wrote Re Re: [libreoffice-users] Recent Documents list: >On 14/01/2013 at 22:36, Caesar wrote: > >> Is there anyway to increase that number to >> greater than ten? > >Yes there is. > >1. Close LibreOffice. >

Re: [libreoffice-users] Recent Documents list

On Mon, 14 Jan 2013 22:15:27 +, Brian Barker wrote Re Re: [libreoffice-users] Recent Documents list: >At 15:36 14/01/2013 -0600, Caesar Noname wrote: >>Re: LO 3.6.4 on Windows XP >> >>In both Writer and Calc if one clicks on >> File - Recent Documents >>the

[libreoffice-users] Recent Documents list

Hello all, Re: LO 3.6.4 on Windows XP In both Writer and Calc if one clicks on File - Recent Documents they are presented with a list of up to ten of the most recently accessed documents. Is there anyway to increase that number to greater than ten? Thanks -- For unsubscribe instructions e-m

Re: [libreoffice-users] Open Office and Libre Office Questions...

On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 14:34:39 +0200, "R.S." wrote Re Re: [libreoffice-users] Open Office and Libre Office Questions...: >Il 19/04/2012 6.03, Jerry Greenberg ha scritto: >> >> Is it possible to have both Libre Office and Open Office installed at the >> same time on the same computer? >> >> Are the

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Top posting

On Sat, 25 Feb 2012 13:04:40 +0100, Stefan Weigel wrote Re Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Top posting: >Hi, > >Am 25.02.2012 12:30, schrieb Caesar: > >> On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 21:24:58 -0500, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak > >> wrote > >>> What I meant was &quo

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Top posting

On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 21:24:58 -0500, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote Re Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Top posting: >On 02/23/2012 04:18 AM, Caesar wrote: >> On Wed, 22 Feb 2012 23:38:59 -0500, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak >> wrote Re Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Top >> posting: >&

Re: [libreoffice-users] Top posting

On Thu, 23 Feb 2012 08:31:26 -0500, Tanstaafl wrote Re Re: [libreoffice-users] Top posting: >I'm DONE with you Tom... you are now officially and forever PLONKED, >never to have one of your brain-dead, disrespectful emails to grace my >Inbox again. That is exactly the way to deal with it. I ma

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Top posting

On Wed, 22 Feb 2012 23:38:59 -0500, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote Re Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Top posting: > >On 02/22/2012 03:10 PM, T. R. Valentine wrote: >> On 22 February 2012 13:56, Larry Gusaas wrote: >> >> I avoid the aggravation by having posts from Tom Davies automatically >> delete

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Write2epub

On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 05:23:27 -0500, webmaster for Kracked Press Productions wrote Re Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Write2epub: >>> Why not PDF? What is the advantage of epub? >>> >> >> On ebook readers, epub text flows as required with different font >> sizes. PDFs don't. Indeed. I've tried cop

Re: [libreoffice-users] Paragraph format problem

On Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:01:28 +0100, Cor Nouws wrote Re Re: [libreoffice-users] Paragraph format problem: >Caesar wrote (10-02-12 14:31) > >> Just curious: "If length greater than 50%" of what? > >Of available width, I would guess. Well duh, that makes sense. N

Re: [libreoffice-users] Paragraph format problem

On Fri, 10 Feb 2012 04:15:21 +, Brian Barker wrote Re Re: [libreoffice-users] Paragraph format problem: >o Go to Tools | AutoCorrect Options... | Options, and tick "Combine >single line paragraphs if length greater than 50%". Just curious: "If length greater than 50%" of what? -- For uns

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Latest version?

On Fri, 06 Jan 2012 11:05:42 -0500, Fabian Rodriguez wrote Re Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Latest version?: >No, I assumed you meant what you wrote initially. The Op didn't ask the >same question, he most probably sent the same message twice by mistake. Yes, that is exactly what happened. My tha

[libreoffice-users] Latest version?

Can someone tell me if LibreOffice 3.4.4 Final (2011-11-09) is the lates version? I thought I read somewhere that a v3.5 was out there, but I'm not sure. Thanks. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-li

[libreoffice-users] Latest version?

Can someone tell me if LibreOffice 3.4.4 Final (2011-11-09) is the lates version? I thought I read somewhere that a v3.5 was out there, but I'm not sure. Thanks. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-li

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: When will be a Web-Version of OOo/LO available?

On Wed, 14 Dec 2011 10:35:51 -0500, webmaster for Kracked Press Productions wrote Re Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: When will be a Web-Version of OOo/LO available?: >I was part of the movement. I even saw PCs used as dumb terminals for a >time with software like "Kermit" being used since it had th

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: When will be a Web-Version of OOo/LO available?

On Wed, 14 Dec 2011 10:07:38 -0500, webmaster for Kracked Press Productions wrote Re Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: When will be a Web-Version of OOo/LO available?: >Personally, I do not like the idea of cloud based computing, for >security reasons and ownership of files. If the connection to the

Re: [libreoffice-users] unsubscribe

On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 18:56:39 +0300, Stan Goodman wrote Re Re: [libreoffice-users] unsubscribe: >Given that there are lazy people, and also even many more people who >simply don't know the drill and don't know exactly what to scrutinize >to make sure that they're not missing any bets, the ratio

Re: [libreoffice-users] Paypal phishing warning

On Wed, 8 Jun 2011 23:39:31 -0700, MR ZenWiz wrote Re [libreoffice-users] Paypal phishing warning: >Sorry for the cross-post, and off-topic at that, but: Thanks for the warning. -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to users+h...@libreoffice.org In case of problems unsubscribing, write to postma

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Is this list unmoderated?

On Fri, 3 Jun 2011 21:10:39 -0700, Robert Holtzman wrote Re Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Is this list unmoderated?: >On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 11:05:45AM +0200, James Wilde wrote: >> >> Personally I think mailing lists are so last century and nerdy, and that we >> should be using a forum which non