[libreoffice-users] Re: Libreoffice headless option

2012-05-31 Thread David Bolen
merter writes: > All these commands are looking for an X server. How can I avoid it? I don't believe it's actually looking for a server, rather it just needs a library related to X11. When run in headless mode, no communication with an X server will take place, but since the LO binary you have

[libreoffice-users] Re: Libreoffice headless option

2012-06-01 Thread merter
Hi, Yes, I installed them manually using the DEB packages. I tried to install those dependencies but it is now silently failing and giving no output whatsoever. I tried to debug it with my poor gdb skills, but gdb log is saying; Program exited with code 0115. No stack. By the way, I have instal

[libreoffice-users] Re: Libreoffice headless option

2012-06-01 Thread David Bolen
merter writes: > I tried to install those dependencies but it is now silently failing and > giving no output whatsoever. I tried to debug it with my poor gdb skills, > but gdb log is saying; > > Program exited with code 0115. > No stack. Presumably the code is intentionally exiting, so to gdb it

[libreoffice-users] Re: Libreoffice headless option

2012-06-01 Thread merter
Hi, Thanks for the replies, they've been really helpful. Yes it is failing with the latest version of Libreoffice and works with the latest version of AOO. I am also not able to install an X server, but I could drill down what's causing the issue. It seems the issue is the package dependency of D

[libreoffice-users] Re: Libreoffice headless option

2012-06-01 Thread David Bolen
merter writes: > The missing package was libobasis3.5-en-us_3.5.3-2_amd64.deb. I re-checked > all these installed packages and none of them has a dependency to that file. > It now seems an obvious file to install but since I trusted the dependency > system, I missed it. I think that's because y

[libreoffice-users] Re: Libreoffice headless option

2012-06-01 Thread merter
Hi, I see. Yes I am installing the deb packages downloaded from TDF. Optimisation was the main reason I was cherry picking the packages, and since Libreoffice comes with separate packages instead of one single package, I thought it is encouraged when needed. Our old system is a 1.5 years old serv

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Libreoffice headless option

2012-06-01 Thread Tom Davies
tuned into gui apps.  Anyway, hopefully the wiki-page might help get strace (or whatnot as the space-station reporter often says) Regards from Tom :)  --- On Fri, 1/6/12, merter wrote: From: merter Subject: [libreoffice-users] Re: Libreoffice headless option To: users

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Libreoffice headless option

2012-06-01 Thread Andrew Douglas Pitonyak
I will repeat what I think that you are saying so that I can better understand In your current trials you are attempting to do something that: 1. Fails with the latest release of LibreOffice (LO). 2. Works in OOo. Do you mean the latest Apache OpenOffice (AOO), or legacy OOo? If this is the

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Libreoffice headless option

2012-06-05 Thread Tom Davies
Hi :) Is it the Debian packagers that need to know about this?  I think they are the ones that choose which other packages are listed as dependencies of packages in their repos? Regards from Tom :)  --- On Fri, 1/6/12, merter wrote: From: merter Subject: [libreoffice-users] Re