Yes, unzipping. I believe it was because, for whatever reason, the
libraries needed for Berkeley spooling were not present in the zip files
after the March release if memory serves. They previously had been.
David
-Original Message-
From: Dave Love,,, [mailto:d.l...@liverpool.ac.uk]
Hello,
I recently tried installing GE2011.11p1 and after configuring it I get a
seg-fault when trying to start the qmaster. If anyone has any insight I
would appreciate the help.
OS: Centos 6.3x86_32
I used/use the following set of commands to install GE2011, you'll note the
.po
Hi,
I am looking for something like "Platform-RTM". To configure cluster and
also to maintain the history on overall cluster & individual nodes. So to
my knowledge "qmon" is just like a admin tool.
Thank you
Chakri
On Sat, 25 Aug 2012, Reuti wrote:
Hi,
Am 25.08.2012 um 02:04 schrieb Dav
Most of our users don't run 32-bit Linux, but we tested it and it
worked for us (earlier RHEL versions, but not CentOS 6.3). Can you run
the qmaster under gdb so that gdb would show the stack trace?
Rayson
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 10:35 AM, Karl Vollmer wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I recently tried in
Morning Dave,
Thank you for the suggestion. I will give a try ? also what are the SGE
builds that you have on this site. Are they the free version of SGE ? I
mean can I try that on a full production cluster with more than 300 nodes
?
Thank you
Chakri
On Sat, 25 Aug 2012, Dave Love wrote:
Rayson
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
[Switching to Thread 0xb51ffb70 (LWP 3441)]
0x0824ce78 in sge_get_message_id_output_implementation ()
(gdb) bt
#0 0x0824ce78 in sge_get_message_id_output_implementation ()
#1 0x0824cf0d in sge_gettext_ ()
#2 0x08239fae in sge_monitor_i
Thanks, so it was indeed an i13n / locate issue (and we don't usually
compile with " -intl", as we only need English messages).
Did you try the binaries without compiling without " -intl"?
Rayson
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 10:56 AM, Karl Vollmer wrote:
> Rayson
>
> Program received signal SIGSEG
Thanks for your answer, I'll deal with the clean shutdown in my application.
However, do you know whether this task failure detection can be disabled ?
It is acceptable for me to have one worker process crashing, but not if it
kills the whole job as a side effect...
2012/8/26 Reuti
> Hi,
>
> Am
Am 27.08.2012 um 18:20 schrieb Julien Nicoulaud:
> Thanks for your answer, I'll deal with the clean shutdown in my application.
>
> However, do you know whether this task failure detection can be disabled ? It
> is acceptable for me to have one worker process crashing, but not if it kills
> the
