Apache 2.0.54-4 on Debian Sid.
I have a setup with the document root with no access, but then I allow
access to individual subdirectories (normally via basic auth).
Say foo is one of those sub-directories and DocRoot is
/var/lib/projects.
So a request for:
GET http://bumby:88/foo/env.cgi/ot
> -Original Message-
> From: Justin Conover [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Oh, the reason I didn't use "virtuals" is we need to be able to
> start/stop specific instances. From my understanding this isn't
> possible in the VirtualHost section, is that incorrect?
You can achieve the effect
> -Original Message-
> From: McLaughlin, Brent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Dienstag, 7. Juni 2005 05:06
> To: users@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Encountering compile problems
> installing version
> 2.0.54 on HP-UX
>
>
> Hello,
> I am attempting to get the lat
Wondering if someone can please assist with the following two
RedirectMatch regex's (My regex skills are zilch!)
RedirectMatch /main.cfm?=page&content&id=946
http://www.domain.com.au/privacy.html
RedirectMatch /main.cfm?page=unsubscribe
http://www.domain.com.au/unsubscribe/index.html
The ".", "?"
Hello,
I am attempting to get the latest version of Apache installed
under HP-UX. I have followed the instructions and all was well until
the make. During the make a compile problem is being reported.
Is anyone else encountering a compile problem in HP-UX environments for
the latest ap
Ivan Barrera A. wrote:
Using some packaged distro (as fedora) is pretty easy
rpm -VVV on each package, and reinstall the affected ones (supossing
that you have some binary replaced)
The eggdrop.. you can wipe it out of the disk
Eben Goodman wrote:
I actually know which user it got through on
Using some packaged distro (as fedora) is pretty easy
rpm -VVV on each package, and reinstall the affected ones (supossing
that you have some binary replaced)
The eggdrop.. you can wipe it out of the disk
Eben Goodman wrote:
> I actually know which user it got through on, it came in through an
>
Eben Goodman wrote:
I actually know which user it got through on, it came in through an
insecure php nuke application. I have since removed the nuke app, but
the damage appears to be done, since this eggdrop crap is still running
on the server. Is there a way to find, and remove the software
Eben Goodman wrote:
I recently had an irc exploit on my server running this eggdrop relay
thing via apache. I was able to find the offending files and remove
them and the eggdrop processes went away for awhile, but now they are
back and try as I might I can't find any files that correspond to
thanks for the help, found the files in /var/tmp... thanks again
Eben
Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
On Mon, 6 Jun 2005, Eben Goodman wrote:
find / -user apache -print
-Dan
I actually know which user it got through on, it came in through an
insecure php nuke application. I have since r
On Mon, 6 Jun 2005, Eben Goodman wrote:
find / -user apache -print
-Dan
I actually know which user it got through on, it came in through an insecure
php nuke application. I have since removed the nuke app, but the damage
appears to be done, since this eggdrop crap is still running on the se
I actually know which user it got through on, it came in through an
insecure php nuke application. I have since removed the nuke app, but
the damage appears to be done, since this eggdrop crap is still running
on the server. Is there a way to find, and remove the software once it
has found it
On Mon, 6 Jun 2005, Eben Goodman wrote:
If you're doing multi-hosting, look into suexec. the fact that it runs
CGI's as the user is kinda secondary to the fact that it shows you WHICH
user uploaded the insecure script.
For PHP scripts, I've had good luck running suPHP (which is not an
offic
Yep.
It is most probably that you were hacked through PHP.
Most common way of "hacking" this way, is abusing sites running
PHP-Nuke, phpBB, and many other sites using "unsafe" programming techniques.
If you look in the mailing archives, you can find lots of answers to
this type of problems.
(consi
I recently had an irc exploit on my server running this eggdrop relay
thing via apache. I was able to find the offending files and remove
them and the eggdrop processes went away for awhile, but now they are
back and try as I might I can't find any files that correspond to this
software. When
Philippe Reynolds wrote:
Greetings all,
I'm currently just starting with Apache so sorry in advance if my
terminology isn't the greatest.
I'm creating dynamic html pages that contain forms and integrated
php. Like in any form it contains a submit button. This first is the
interface where
1. apache 2.0.54 on Sol 8
2. I have the following in a vhost used for client auth proxy
SSLProxyEngine On
SSLVerifyDepth 4
SSLProxyVerify require
SSLProxyCACertificateFile "/usr/local/apache/server2/ssl/CA.pem"
SSLProxyMachineCertificateFile
"/usr/local/apache/server2/ssl/client.
Hi Bill,
>>[I asked this on the user list, and think it should have been asked
>>here...]
> No, it did belong on the users list :)
Ok, thanks! And apologies.
>>I'm quite new to Apache, and trying to understand what a graceful restart
>>on Windows actually does. I'm running Apache with mod_jk
Does mod_proxy also honor LimitRequestBody directive?
we can't seem to get 2.0.52 - 2.0.54 on win2k to return a 413 when the limit is
exceeded and the request is reversed proxied to a remote server.
-
The official User-To-Use
At 11:38 AM 6/6/2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>[I asked this on the user list, and think it should have been asked
>here...]
No, it did belong on the users list :)
>I'm quite new to Apache, and trying to understand what a graceful restart
>on Windows actually does. I'm running Apache with mod_j
* Peter Mayer wrote:
> http://httpd.apache.org/docs/mod/mod_actions.html#script
> "Prior to Apache 1.3.10, method can only be one of GET, POST, PUT, or
> DELETE. As of 1.3.10, any arbitrary method name may be used. Method names
> are case-sensitive, so Script PUT and Script put have two entirely
Hello!
I would like to add the SEARCH method to the allowed request methods - with
the SCRIPT directive it should be no problem:
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/mod/mod_actions.html#script
"Prior to Apache 1.3.10, method can only be one of GET, POST, PUT, or
DELETE. As of 1.3.10, any arbitrary m
This is unlikely to be an apache problem. You might check out one
of the php forums and see if there is a difference between firefox and IE
that might explain the problem.
Best o'luck
Gene
Philippe Reynolds wrote:
Greetings all,
I'm currently just starting with Apache so sorry in advance if m
Title: Message
I
don't know if this message got to mailing list, so I'm resending
it...
-Original Message-From: Jorge Dionisio
Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 17:09To:
'users@httpd.apache.org'Subject: mod_auth_pam + winbind
question...
Hi
all.
I have apache 2.0
configured with mod
Title: Message
Hi
all.
I have apache 2.0
configured with mod_auth_pam and winbind plugin to authenticate my users in an
Active Directory but in /var/log/messeges i get: user x granted access to
resource y but apache later returns me an error Access Denied, invalid
credentials, can anybod
Did you adjust all of your timeouts to allow for the upload? That is a lot
to ask of the protocol in my opinion. You should find another way to do
it.
-Original Message-
From: Harish Sundaram [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 10:42 AM
To: Apache Forum
Subject: [EMAIL
Hello,
Apache is not meant to transfer large files. accepting 50Mb through php
is already a large amount... Perhaps you should look into FTP /
distributed file systems ?
(ask yourself the right question, will you really upload 2GB files
everyday and have it served through www ?)
Harish Sun
Have you checked this?
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/mod/core.html#limitrequestbody
Thanx
Aaron N Wagner
Monitoring Systems and Network Tools
CCO-Command Center Operations
804.515.6298
> -Original Message-
> From: Harish Sundaram [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005
Hi,
(B
(BIs there any way by which I can upload (i.e. POST) a file greater than 2GB
(Bsize to my Apache Server? If yes, how? Please suggest some browser which can
(Bachieve the same.
(B
(BI'm using Apache 2.0.53 on HP-UX11i. Browser is MS-IE6.0 and everytime I try
(Bthe same, I get the follo
Already correctly pointed out - this is not an apache question and you
should look at the code.
I would like to add that the code probably has something that disables
the button (maybe a javascript) which is not supported by another
browser but IE and so you get the 'ding' sound.
Of course, Not
On 6/4/05, Patrick Donker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Exactly! People dont have the time to read the docs, but do have time to
> subscribe to and write messages to the list asking for solutions and
> wait for them. Where does that time come from then?
For most people, it is much quicker to ask s
It is highly unlikely to be apache. Look into your code, and perhaps join
a group associated with this.
What is the standard 'ding' sound, and what is the error?
P
-Original Message-
From: Philippe Reynolds [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 11:10 AM
To: users@httpd.
Greetings all,
I'm currently just starting with Apache so sorry in advance if my
terminology isn't the greatest.
I'm creating dynamic html pages that contain forms and integrated php. Like
in any form it contains a submit button. This first is the interface where
people can enter values et
Hi
Ooops - I posted this on [EMAIL PROTECTED] - my apologies!
I am desparate...
My intention is to access SubVersion via Apache's WebDAV feature.
I am trying to compile Apache 2.0.54 with support for BerkeleyDB 4.3.
under Linux.
Compilation and installation of Berkeley DB worked fine and I i
* Andreas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [0634 23:34]:
>
> >Setup a log for mod_jk2.
>
> /usr/local/apache2/logs/error_log:
>
> [Thu Jun 02 01:36:24 2005] [notice] Apache/2.0.54 (Unix) configured --
> resuming normal operations
> [Thu Jun 02 02:19:08 2005] [notice] caught SIGTERM, shutting down
> [Thu Ju
35 matches
Mail list logo
