On Jun 15, 2007, at 8:54 PM, Totte wrote:
Hi,
As I understand, one can't use several ssl certificates on one IP.
However,
can I use the same certificate for different virtual hosts?
I have the domain zzz.com and I want use ssl for say abc.zzz.com and
def.zzz.com and using only one server (on
On 6/15/07, Totte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
As I understand, one can't use several ssl certificates on one IP. However,
can I use the same certificate for different virtual hosts?
I have the domain zzz.com and I want use ssl for say abc.zzz.com and
def.zzz.com and using only one server (one
I think they would complain that they are not certifying the correct
domain (all but one) and some browsers may not accept that.
I think your choices are rather limited when it comes to https.
On Jun 15, 2007, at 9:54 PM, Totte wrote:
Hi,
As I understand, one can't use several ssl certifica
Hi,
As I understand, one can't use several ssl certificates on one IP. However,
can I use the same certificate for different virtual hosts?
I have the domain zzz.com and I want use ssl for say abc.zzz.com and
def.zzz.com and using only one server (one IP as I understand). Is that
possible?
than
On Jun 15, 2007, at 1:17 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Bill Hernandez wrote:
PROPPATCH
MKCOL COPY MOVE LOCK UNLOCK>
Require user robert tommy
Require group sales maintenance
There is no such thing, actually, as two Limit sections per context.
So one is
Bill Hernandez wrote:
>> > MKCOL COPY MOVE LOCK UNLOCK>
>> Require user robert tommy
>>
>>
>> Require group sales maintenance
>>
There is no such thing, actually, as two Limit sections per context.
So one is being ignored. Limit[Except] is not a first class co
On Jun 15, 2007, at 11:19 AM, Bill Hernandez wrote:
HERE's what used to work with the LDAP users and groups
Order allow,deny
Allow from all
AuthName "private"
AuthType Basic
MKCOL COPY MOVE LOCK UNLOCK>
Require user robert tommy
Hi guys,
I'm trying to rewrite outgoing url as follows:
incoming to apache ---> http://myhost.com//folder
rewriten to> http://myhost.com/folder
then forwarded to load balancer mod_jk > /folder/* loadbalancer
(geronimo servers)
the o
Boyle Owen wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Jay Chandler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 15, 2007 3:22 AM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 404 on UserDir
Trying to get UserDir working on Apache2.2 under FreeBSD.
Error log shows:
File does not exist: /
I had tagged this on to my previous message, but decided it was
better to break it off on its own, since it is a different issue
altogether :
When I first installed OS X Server a couple of years ago I added some
users and groups to the LDAP directory, and through the OS X Server
GUI I was
> > On 6/13/07, Aaron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > No multiple IPs on the outside. I would just do a 1 to 1 nat if that
> > > were the case.
> On Wed, 2007-06-13 at 09:14 -0400, Joshua Slive wrote:
> > You're screwed then. You can't do IP-based virtual hosting with only a
> > single public IP
> On 6/15/07, Mark Watts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On 6/15/07, Boyle Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > I'd try it and see - I think the worst that can happen is that you
> > > > see no effect; ie, things don't get any better, they're unlikely to
> > > > get worse.
> > >
> > > I'm just
On Jun 15, 2007, at 8:23 AM, Joshua Slive wrote:
The virtual host contains :
Order allow,deny
[Thu Jun 14 20:52:37 2007] [error] [client 34.139.17.xx] client
denied by server configuration: /etc/apache/htdocs/private
You'll need an "Allow from all" since the default access state
On 6/15/07, Krist van Besien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/15/07, Joshua Slive <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 6/15/07, Krist van Besien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > mod_cache for apache 2.0 is marked "experimental". How reliable is it?
>
> As others have mentioned, mod_disk_ca
On 6/15/07, Joshua Slive <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/15/07, Krist van Besien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> mod_cache for apache 2.0 is marked "experimental". How reliable is it?
As others have mentioned, mod_disk_cache mostly works.
But you are much better off using 2.2 where it i
On 6/15/07, Mark Watts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 6/15/07, Boyle Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'd try it and see - I think the worst that can happen is that you see
> > no effect; ie, things don't get any better, they're unlikely to get
> > worse.
>
> I'm just worried about what an "
On 6/15/07, Charles Michener <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am running Apache 2.2 on Windows XP and I am seeing several of the
following errors in the error log. What do they mean (in layman English)
and what should I do (if anything) - I don't see any unusual loading problem
- each transaction is
I am running Apache 2.2 on Windows XP and I am seeing several of the following
errors in the error log. What do they mean (in layman English) and what should
I do (if anything) - I don't see any unusual loading problem - each transaction
is occurring within 0.5 seconds.
[Sun Jun 10 11:06:50 20
On 6/15/07, Krist van Besien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
mod_cache for apache 2.0 is marked "experimental". How reliable is it?
As others have mentioned, mod_disk_cache mostly works.
But you are much better off using 2.2 where it is no longer
experimental and has received many fixes.
J
On 6/15/07, Bill Hernandez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
When I try to access this directory https://www.example.com/private/
Instead of getting the login dialog, I get the Forbidden error message :
Forbidden
You don't have permission to access /private/ on this server.
The virtual host contains
> Hello,
>
> mod_cache for apache 2.0 is marked "experimental". How reliable is it?
> Would it be a bad idea to use it in production?
> We have a problem that I think I might be able to solve with
> mod_cache. If this a bad idea I might need another solution.
>
> Krist
I had enabled mod_cache(di
When I try to access this directory https://www.example.com/private/
Instead of getting the login dialog, I get the Forbidden error message :
Forbidden
You don't have permission to access /private/ on this server.
The virtual host contains :
Order allow,deny
AuthName "private"
I'm running into a configuration problem with fcgid (I think it's fcgid) and
there just doesn't seem to be the documentation out there that works.
I keep running into a problem where I only generate 5 fcgid process and then I
get errors that the server is too busy to respond. There are only th
> On 6/15/07, Boyle Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'd try it and see - I think the worst that can happen is that you see
> > no effect; ie, things don't get any better, they're unlikely to get
> > worse.
>
> I'm just worried about what an "experimental" module might do to my
> webserver's st
On 6/15/07, Boyle Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'd try it and see - I think the worst that can happen is that you see
no effect; ie, things don't get any better, they're unlikely to get
worse.
I'm just worried about what an "experimental" module might do to my
webserver's stability (which h
> -Original Message-
> From: Krist van Besien [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, June 15, 2007 10:49 AM
> To: users@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Caching.
>
> Hello,
>
> mod_cache for apache 2.0 is marked "experimental". How reliable is it?
> Would it be a bad idea
Hello,
mod_cache for apache 2.0 is marked "experimental". How reliable is it?
Would it be a bad idea to use it in production?
We have a problem that I think I might be able to solve with
mod_cache. If this a bad idea I might need another solution.
Krist
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bremgarten b. Bern,
> -Original Message-
> From: Jay Chandler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, June 15, 2007 3:22 AM
> To: users@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 404 on UserDir
>
> Trying to get UserDir working on Apache2.2 under FreeBSD.
>
> Error log shows:
> File does not exist: /w
28 matches
Mail list logo
