When I SetHandler cgi-script in .htaccess, I get "Internal server error";
when I SetHandler application/x-httpd-cgi, the script runs fine. What may
the reason be?
Chris
Dear all.
I am trying to install apache http server version 2.2.11 for centos 5.
During the first step, i hit the error of "Error: decision on anonymous
shared memory allocation method failed" and not able to proceed further. I
would like to seek the help and really appreciate if anyone could
Lyle Wincentsen wrote:
Thanks for your help, that solved the problem.
To answer your question as to why I don't want my php scripts to be
in the document root tree, it is a potential security issue. I would
rather not allow anyone to peruse my source code as they may be abl
Thanks for your help, that solved the problem.
To answer your question as to why I don't want my php scripts to be in the
document root tree, it is a potential security issue. I would rather not
allow anyone to peruse my source code as they may be able to find ways to
exploit it more easily.
On
Hi
SPECF
Apache : 2.2.11
Mod jk : mod_jk-1.2.26-httpd-2.0.59.so
JBOSS : 4.2.1 ( 2 nos)
The specific web apps on the JBOSS are
http://: /acme
http://: /acme
The same have been configured in worker1.properties via Load balancer in
Apache/conf directory
The Problem
1) PUBLIC D
Grant Peel wrote:
Then I suppose the next question is, could one use mod_rewrite or some
other tool to parse the content (html cide), (and obliterate it
possibly) before it is even sent to the client?
Not effectively, given the way it encodes itself to avoid detection.
Anything you write will
Look at Wp's "Permalinks" settings. This is how WP masks it's url. It
will generate some code you need to include in your WP .htaccess file.
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 2:19 PM, Marcin 'Rambo' Roguski
wrote:
> Also, I just checked: in WP configuration that's "blog's URL address".
>
>
Also, I just checked: in WP configuration that's "blog's URL address".
-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> Thus http://drew.mykitchentable.net/fatblog is just the URL to my
> WordPress installation. There is nothing being done by Apache.
I believe that's the root of your problems: wordpress uses it's own
URL rewriting scheme bypassing whatever the host system uses.
you should check in wordpress u
On Sun, 24 May 2009 11:31:51 -0400
"Grant Peel" wrote:
> Thanks Nicholas,
>
> "How could your server possibly assist in such a transaction?" Was
> exactly the root question.
>
> Since you've answered it in your previous statement: "An IFrame is
> completely loaded by the browser"
>
> Then I
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 11:31 AM, Grant Peel wrote:
> Thanks Nicholas,
>
> "How could your server possibly assist in such a transaction?" Was exactly
> the root question.
>
> Since you've answered it in your previous statement: "An IFrame is
> completely loaded by the browser"
>
> Then I suppose
Jonas Eckerman wrote:
Drew Tomlinson wrote:
The other is new. What I want is that if I enter the blog via
http://fatblog.freehealthupdates.com/$1, that URL remains in the
address bar of the browser and only the /$1 part would change. As it
stands now, if I enter via that URL, after the firs
Davide Bianchi wrote:
Drew Tomlinson wrote:
The two URLs are:
http://drew.mykitchentable.net/fatblog
http://fatblog.freehealthupdates.com
The first one is not a domain name, but a domain name + a subdir, that
make me think that you already have some sort of rewrite or redirect
rule th
Thanks Nicholas,
"How could your server possibly assist in such a transaction?" Was exactly
the root question.
Since you've answered it in your previous statement: "An IFrame is
completely loaded by the browser"
Then I suppose the next question is, could one use mod_rewrite or some other
Grant Peel wrote:
Can this be done on the server side somehow, or is an iFrame completely
loaded by the browser (i.e. doe the content pas through the server
first, or is it cmpletely pulled by the client?).
An IFrame is completely loaded by the browser, of course. How could your
server possib
Hi all,
I have serveral sites that have had an malicious iFrame injected.
I would like to block the sites that the iFrame poiunts to.
Can this be done on the server side somehow, or is an iFrame completely loaded
by the browser (i.e. doe the content pas through the server first, or is it
cmple
Drew Tomlinson wrote:
The other is new. What I want is that if I enter the blog via
http://fatblog.freehealthupdates.com/$1, that URL remains in the address
bar of the browser and only the /$1 part would change. As it stands
now, if I enter via that URL, after the first click, the address ba
Anthony Catel wrote:
André Warnier a écrit :
Anthony Catel wrote:
...
So if the proxied server never close the connection Apache will have a
ghost connection during "ProxyTimeout value" seconds. It's annoying :p
Not "never close the connection"; rather, if the proxied server never
finishes a
Res wrote:
On Sun, 24 May 2009, Lester Caine wrote:
This is a general anarchy problem with everybody reinterpreting the
'rules' for standardisation of the directory structure to their own
ends. Since the
Not just directory naming, they rename binaries as well *THAT* is my key
objection :)
On Sun, 24 May 2009, Lester Caine wrote:
This is a general anarchy problem with everybody reinterpreting the 'rules'
for standardisation of the directory structure to their own ends. Since the
Not just directory naming, they rename binaries as well *THAT* is my key
objection :)
--
Res
-B
Res wrote:
Sander,
Maybe a vote should be taken to issue notice to them, to cease renaming
key apache components, its bad enough the butchering they do, but
renaming is crossing the line IMHO, as we've just seen why in this
thread, for every one you hear, you know there's many thousands more y
Sander,
Maybe a vote should be taken to issue notice to them, to cease renaming
key apache components, its bad enough the butchering they do, but renaming is
crossing the line IMHO, as we've just seen why in this thread, for every
one you hear, you know there's many thousands more you don't.
One would assume the Apache Debian packager is on this list, perhaps they
would like to comment as to why they do this, but I suspect they will not.
Nothing beats the source install, if you screwup it takes seconds to
revert to previous version and you know you are using just that version.
I
23 matches
Mail list logo
