Re: [users@httpd] fedora - apache

2013-04-13 Thread John Iliffe
You might also check that the ENTIRE ifcfg-eth0 configuration is there. I installed RHEL6 and the file was truncated for some reason. Fedora is very similar so could have made the same error. FYI, the entire file should look more or less like this: DEVICE="eth0" BOOTPROTO=none NM_CONTROLLED="

Re: [users@httpd] fedora - apache

2013-04-13 Thread Adam Dosch
I believe since around Fedora 15, all network devices take on a new naming convention based (see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/ConsistentNetworkDeviceNaming). So looking explicitly for ifcfg-eth* in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts would be the case if you're passing kernel boot paramet

Re: [users@httpd] fedora - apache

2013-04-13 Thread Jim Albert
I expect the interfaces would have been detected and configured during the linux install, but check: /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts for files looking like ifcfg-eth* (probably ifcfg-eth0 if only one NIC) as those would be your network interface configurations. On 4/13/2013 9:49 AM, georg wrote

Re: [users@httpd] fedora - apache

2013-04-13 Thread Serge Fonville
> so does that mean there is no Hw on the machine for eth ? If the connector is there, but the OS sees no NIC, it is likely the matter, that the NIC driver is not installed. If you run lspci and filter on ehternet. you might be able to determine the make and model of the NIC. >From thereon you can

Re: [users@httpd] fedora - apache

2013-04-13 Thread georg
Plugg -> socket for plugg for standard eth cable i.e. /georg - Original Message - From: georg To: users@httpd.apache.org Sent: Saturday, April 13, 2013 3:49 PM Subject: Re: [users@httpd] fedora - apache right ifconfig only comes up with local loop i-f, so does that mean

Re: [users@httpd] fedora - apache

2013-04-13 Thread georg
right ifconfig only comes up with local loop i-f, so does that mean there is no Hw on the machine for eth ? (there is a distinct plugg looking IPish :) /georg - Original Message - From: Serge Fonville To: users@httpd.apache.org Sent: Saturday, April 13, 2013 4:10 PM Subject

Re: [users@httpd] fedora - apache

2013-04-13 Thread Serge Fonville
Hi, > Possibly you have a hint for where im stuck just now: Cant find any ethernet > device on the PC im digging into. Perhaps there is no NIC detected. if you run ifconfig and lspci, you should be able to determine if that is the case HTH Kind regards/met vriendelijke groet, Serge Fonville h

Re: [users@httpd] fedora - apache

2013-04-13 Thread georg
Terrific, tnx. Possibly you have a hint for where im stuck just now: Cant find any ethernet device on the PC im digging into. (new to linux/fedora, but shurely there should be some eth ??) tnx again Georg - Original Message - From: "How7" To: Sent: Saturday, April 13, 2013 3:27 P

Re: [users@httpd] fedora - apache

2013-04-13 Thread How7
On 4/13/2013 7:45 AM, georg wrote: I have seen some documentation that indicate that some version (2.2?) of Apache is included in the fedora dist. Does anyone have any information of how to find such a package and whether these are good things or if I should go for downloading other version

[users@httpd] fedora - apache

2013-04-13 Thread georg
Hi, Ive taken to installing fedora version linux on a PC, intend to run as a server down the line I have seen some documentation that indicate that some version (2.2?) of Apache is included in the fedora dist. Does anyone have any information of how to find such a package and whether these are