You might also check that the ENTIRE ifcfg-eth0 configuration is there. I installed RHEL6 and the file was truncated for some reason. Fedora is very similar so could have made the same error.
FYI, the entire file should look more or less like this: DEVICE="eth0" BOOTPROTO=none NM_CONTROLLED="yes" ONBOOT=yes TYPE="Ethernet" UUID="be94de20-47e0-441a-ab6b-454a17ae89ed" HWADDR=50:46:5D:06:BA:DB IPADDR=192.168.1.18 PREFIX=24 DNS1=192.168.1.1 DEFROUTE=yes IPV4_FAILURE_FATAL=yes IPV6INIT=no NAME="System eth0" NETMASK=255.255.255.0 GATEWAY=192.168.1.1 Regards, John ======================================= On Saturday 13 April 2013 10:48:25 Adam Dosch wrote: > I believe since around Fedora 15, all network devices take on a new > naming convention based (see > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/ConsistentNetworkDeviceNaming). > So looking explicitly for ifcfg-eth* in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts > would be the case if you're passing kernel boot parameter > 'biosdevname=0'. > > 'lspci' had already been mentioned, and I'd also look in > /sys/class/net/ -> see what devices were found and it will map back > to it's PCI bus location. > > Case in point, if all that came back on 'ifconfig -a' was loopback, > then you don't have the module loaded to support that NIC device, it's > not bootstrapped to be an 'onboot' device, module is blacklisted > (doubtful, but check /etc/modprobe.d), or something else I'm entirely > overthinking or not grasping this morning. > > -A > > On Sat, 13 Apr 2013 10:29:37 -0400, Jim Albert wrote: > > I expect the interfaces would have been detected and configured > > during the linux install, but check: > > /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts > > for files looking like ifcfg-eth* (probably ifcfg-eth0 if only one > > NIC) as those would be your network interface configurations. > > > > On 4/13/2013 9:49 AM, georg wrote: > >> right ifconfig only comes up with local loop i-f, > >> so does that mean there is no Hw on the machine for eth ? (there is > >> a > >> distinct plugg looking IPish :) > >> /georg > >> > >> ----- Original Message ----- > >> *From:* Serge Fonville <mailto:serge.fonvi...@gmail.com> > >> *To:* users@httpd.apache.org <mailto:users@httpd.apache.org> > >> *Sent:* Saturday, April 13, 2013 4:10 PM > >> *Subject:* Re: [users@httpd] fedora - apache > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> >Possibly you have a hint for where im stuck just now: Cant > >> > >> find any > >> > >> ethernet > device on the PC im digging into. > >> Perhaps there is no NIC detected. > >> if you run ifconfig and lspci, you should be able to determine > >> > >> if > >> > >> that is the case > >> > >> HTH > >> > >> Kind regards/met vriendelijke groet, > >> > >> Serge Fonville > >> > >> http://www.sergefonville.nl > >> > >> Convince Microsoft! > >> They need to add TRUNCATE PARTITION in SQL Server > >> > >> https://connect.microsoft.com/SQLServer/feedback/details/417926/trunc > >> ate-partition-of-partitioned-table > >> > >> 2013/4/13 georg <georg.chamb...@telia.com > >> <mailto:georg.chamb...@telia.com>> > >> > >> Terrific, tnx. > >> > >> Possibly you have a hint for where im stuck just now: Cant > >> > >> find > >> > >> any ethernet device on the PC im digging into. > >> (new to linux/fedora, but shurely there should be some eth > >> > >> ??) > >> > >> tnx again > >> Georg > >> > >> ----- Original Message ----- From: "How7" > >> > >> <how0...@freeshell.org > >> > >> <mailto:how0...@freeshell.org>> > >> To: <users@httpd.apache.org <mailto:users@httpd.apache.org>> > >> Sent: Saturday, April 13, 2013 3:27 PM > >> Subject: Re: [users@httpd] fedora - apache > >> > >> On 4/13/2013 7:45 AM, georg wrote: > >> I have seen some documentation that indicate that > >> > >> some > >> > >> version (2.2?) of Apache is > >> included in the fedora dist. > >> Does anyone have any information of how to find such > >> > >> a > >> > >> package and whether these > >> are good things or if I should go for downloading > >> > >> other > >> > >> version > >> > >> In a terminal on my Fedora 16 I do this to see what > >> > >> version > >> > >> I have installed: > >> ~> rpm -q httpd > >> httpd-2.2.21-1.fc16.x86_64 > >> > >> 2.2 is fine for me but I just use it to test my work > >> > >> locally. > >> > >> I would use the yum package manager to see what upgrades > >> > >> are > >> > >> available. Maybe: > >> ~> yum check-update httpd > >> > >> View the yum manual page for more information on package > >> management and updating: > >> ~> man yum > >> > >> If you wanted a newer version than is available at the > >> fedora upgrade repos yum looks at you could build from > >> > >> source. > >> > >> > >> > >> ------------------------------__------------------------------__----- > >> ---- > >> > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: > >> users-unsubscribe@httpd.__apache.org > >> > >> <mailto:users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org> > >> > >> For additional commands, e-mail: > >> users-h...@httpd.apache.org > >> > >> <mailto:users-h...@httpd.apache.org> > >> > >> ------------------------------__------------------------------__----- > >> ---- > >> > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.__apache.org > >> <mailto:users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org> > >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org > >> <mailto:users-h...@httpd.apache.org> > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org
